Complex tactile waveform discrimination.

Complex vibrotactile waveforms consisting of two superimposed sinusoids at varying phases were presented to the fingertip, and observers made "same-different" judgments. It was found that the low-frequency (10Hz+30Hz) waveforms were discriminable from one another while discrimination of the high-frequency (100Hz+300Hz) vibrations was poor. High-frequency adaptation did not impair discrimination of the low-frequency waveforms, suggesting that the RA channel mediated discrimination. Low-frequency adaptation impaired discrimination of the high-frequency stimuli, suggesting that the RA channel likewise mediated the modest level of performance observed in the absence of an adapting stimulus. The results indicate that this channel encodes complex waveforms temporally. A simple model for low-frequency waveform discrimination is proposed. The results obtained with the high-frequency complex waveforms are compatible with the hypothesis that the PC channel integrates stimulus energy over time.

[1]  Robert D. Sorkin,et al.  Extension of the Theory of Signal Detectability to Matching Procedures in Psychoacoustics , 1962 .

[2]  A. Freeman,et al.  Cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey: temporal discharge patterns evoked by vibration, and a receptor model , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  The optimum decision rules in thesame-different paradigm , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  S J Bolanowski,et al.  The effects of masking on vibrotactile temporal summation in the detection of sinusoidal and noise signals. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  C J Vierck,et al.  A critical band filter in touch , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  M. Hollins,et al.  Evidence for the duplex theory of tactile texture perception , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  George A. Gescheider,et al.  Vibrotactile Frequency Characteristics as Determined by Adaptation and Masking Procedures , 1979 .

[9]  A. Freeman,et al.  A model accounting for effects of vibratory amplitude on responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  F. Looft.  Response of monkey glabrous skin mechanoreceptors to random-noise sequences: I. Temporal response characteristics. , 1994, Somatosensory & motor research.

[11]  Verrillo Rt,et al.  Effect of prior stimulation on vibrotactile thresholds. , 1977 .

[12]  K. Johnson,et al.  Neural coding of tactile texture: comparison of spatial and temporal mechanisms for roughness perception , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  F. Looft,et al.  Response of monkey glabrous skin mechanoreceptors to random noise sequences: II. Dynamic stimulus state analysis. , 1996, Somatosensory & motor research.

[14]  K. Horch,et al.  Coding of vibrotactile stimulus frequency by Pacinian corpuscle afferents. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  G A Gescheider.  Evidence in support of the duplex theory of mechanoreception. , 1976, Sensory processes.

[16]  Warren D. Smith.  Clarification of sensitivity measure A , 1995 .

[17]  C. Connor,et al.  Tactile roughness: neural codes that account for psychophysical magnitude estimates , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  S. Bolanowski,et al.  Four channels mediate the mechanical aspects of touch. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  J. Hyvärinen,et al.  Cortical neuronal mechanisms in flutter-vibration studied in unanesthetized monkeys. Neuronal periodicity and frequency discrimination. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  George A. Gescheider,et al.  Enhancement and summation in the perception of two successive vibrotactile stimuli , 1975 .

[21]  M. Hollins,et al.  Vibrotactile adaptation enhances amplitude discrimination. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  B L Whitsel,et al.  Time course and action spectrum of vibrotactile adaptation. , 1990, Somatosensory & motor research.

[23]  F. Looft,et al.  Response of monkey glabrous skin mechanoreceptors to random noise sequences: III. Spectral analysis. , 1996, Somatosensory & motor research.

[24]  M. Hollins,et al.  Vibrotactile adaptation on the face , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  L E Marks,et al.  Summation of vibrotactile intensity: an analog to auditory critical bands? , 1979, Sensory processes.

[26]  G A Gescheider,et al.  Effects of vibrotactile adaptation on the perception of stimuli of varied intensity. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  G A Gescheider,et al.  Effects of sensory adaptation on the form of the psychophysical magnitude function for cutaneous vibration. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  J Bell,et al.  A mechanoreceptor model for rapidly and slowly adapting afferents subjected to periodic vibratory stimuli. , 1995, Mathematical biosciences.