Single fractures under normal stress: The relation between fracture specific stiffness and fluid flow

Abstract Fracture specific stiffness and fluid flow through a single fracture under normal stress are implicitly related through the geometry of the void space and contact area that comprise the fracture. Data from thirteen different rock samples, each containing a single fracture, show that relationships between fracture specific stiffness and fluid flow through a fracture fall into two general classes of behavior. Fractures either fall on a loosely-defined universal curve relating fluid flow to fracture specific stiffness, or else the flow is weakly dependent on fracture specific stiffness. The second relationship shows that flow decreases slowly with increasing fracture specific stiffness. The first relationship shows that flow decreases rapidly for increases in fracture specific stiffness. To understand this behavior, computer simulations on simulated single fractures were performed to calculate fluid flow, fracture displacement, and fracture specific stiffness as a function of normal stress. Simulated fractures with spatially correlated and uncorrelated aperture distributions were studied. Fractures with spatially uncorrelated aperture distributions tend to exhibit a weak dependence of fluid flow on fracture specific stiffness because these fractures tend to have multiple connected paths across the sample which can support flow with uniformly distributed contact area. Thus an increment in stress will increase the stiffness of the fracture without greatly reducing the amount of fluid flow. On the other hand, fractures with spatially correlated aperture distributions tend to belong to the universal relationship because correlated fractures tend to have only one or two dominant flow paths and the contact area is limited to a few regions resulting in a compliant fracture. Thus an increment in stress on a spatially correlated fracture will result in an increase in stiffness and rapid decrease in fluid flow. These spatial correlations in fracture void geometry can be differentiated in the laboratory based on the observed fracture specific stiffness–fluid flow relationship for a single fracture under normal loading.

[1]  Gudmundur S. Bodvarsson,et al.  Lubrication theory analysis of the permeability of rough-walled fractures , 1991 .

[2]  Neville G. W. Cook,et al.  Natural joints in rock: Mechanical, hydraulic and seismic behaviour and properties under normal stress , 1992 .

[3]  S. Gentier,et al.  Laboratory testing of the voids of a fracture , 1989 .

[4]  W. Durham.  Laboratory observations of the hydraulic behavior of a permeable fracture from 3800 m depth in the KTB pilot hole , 1997 .

[5]  A. Keller.  High resolution cat imaging of fractures in consolidated materials , 1997 .

[6]  Stephen R. Brown,et al.  closure of rock joints , 1986 .

[7]  P. A. Witherspoon,et al.  Hydraulic And Mechanical Properties of Natural Fractures In Low Permeability Rock , 1987 .

[8]  J. Berryman,et al.  Two-point correlation functions to characterize microgeometry and estimate permeabilities of synthetic and natural sandstones , 1993 .

[9]  D. Tabor,et al.  An utrasonic study of the area of contact between stationary and sliding surfaces , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[10]  Pyrak-Nolte,et al.  Elastic interface waves propagating in a fracture. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[11]  L. Greengard.  The Rapid Evaluation of Potential Fields in Particle Systems , 1988 .

[12]  H. Einstein,et al.  Laboratory Experiments On Geometric And Hydromechanical Characteristics of Three Different Fractures In Granodiorite , 1995 .

[13]  Carlo D. Montemagno,et al.  Fracture network versus single fractures: Measurement of fracture geometry with X-ray tomography , 1999 .

[14]  Eva Hakami.  Water flow in single rock joints , 1988 .

[15]  Chin-Fu Tsang,et al.  Channel model of flow through fractured media , 1987 .

[16]  G. Swan,et al.  Determination of stiffness and other joint properties from roughness measurements , 1983 .

[17]  Stephen R. Brown,et al.  Correlation between the surfaces of natural rock joints , 1986 .

[18]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  Theory of elasticity , 1975 .

[19]  Nolte,et al.  Stratified continuum percolation: Scaling geometry of hierarchical cascades. , 1991, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[20]  David D. Nolte,et al.  Fluid percolation through single fractures , 1988 .

[21]  David D. Nolte,et al.  The Fractal Geometry of Flow Paths in Natural Fractures in Rock and the Approach to Percolation , 1989 .

[22]  N. Barton,et al.  Strength, deformation and conductivity coupling of rock joints , 1985 .

[23]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[24]  J. Gale,et al.  Comparison of coupled fracture deformation and fluid flow models with direct measurements of fracture pore structure and stress-flow properties , 1987 .

[25]  J. Gale,et al.  WATER FLOW IN A NATURAL ROCK FRACTURE AS A FUNCTION OF STRESS AND SAMPLE SIZE , 1985 .

[26]  Y. Tsang,et al.  The Effect of Tortuosity on Fluid Flow Through a Single Fracture , 1984 .

[27]  A. Unger,et al.  NUMERICAL STUDY OF THE HYDROMECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF TWO ROUGH FRACTURE SURFACES IN CONTACT , 1993 .

[28]  Larry R. Myer,et al.  FRACTURE STIFFNESS AND APERTURE AS A FUNCTION OF APPLIED STRESS AND CONTACT GEOMETRY , 1987 .

[29]  Richard E. Goodman,et al.  Methods of Geological Engineering in Discontinuous Rocks , 1975 .

[30]  Stephen R. Brown,et al.  Closure of random elastic surfaces in contact , 1985 .

[31]  Carlo D. Montemagno,et al.  Volumetric imaging of aperture distributions in connected fracture networks , 1997 .

[32]  Paul A. Johnson,et al.  Nonlinear Mesoscopic Elasticity: Evidence for a New Class of Materials , 1999 .

[33]  J.C.S. Long,et al.  Hydromechanical coupling between stress, stiffness, and hydraulic conductivity of rock joints and fractures , 1990 .

[34]  N. Barton,et al.  FUNDAMENTALS OF ROCK JOINT DEFORMATION , 1983 .

[35]  Terry Engelder,et al.  The permeability of whole and jointed Barre Granite , 1979 .

[36]  Laura J. Pyrak-Nolte,et al.  The seismic response of fractures and the interrelations among fracture properties , 1996 .

[37]  Stephen R. Brown,et al.  Fluid flow through rock joints: The effect of surface roughness , 1987 .

[38]  A. Gangi,et al.  Variation of whole and fractured porous rock permeability with confining pressure , 1978 .

[39]  N. Barton,et al.  Aperture measurements and flow experiments using transparent replicas of rock joints , 1991 .

[40]  N. Cook,et al.  Transmission of seismic waves across single natural fractures , 1990 .

[41]  L. R. Myer,et al.  Fractures: Finite-size scaling and multifractals , 1992 .

[42]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  Theory of Elasticity (3rd ed.) , 1970 .

[43]  Gemei Yang,et al.  Network modelling of flow in natural fractures , 1989 .

[44]  James G. Berryman,et al.  Relationship between specific surface area and spatial correlation functions for anisotropic porous media , 1987 .

[45]  J. S. Y. Wang,et al.  Validity of cubic law for fluid flow in a deformable rock fracture. Technical information report No. 23 , 1979 .