An exploratory study of information technology evaluation and benefits management practices of SMEs in the construction industry

While the number of articles on IT evaluation and benefits management has been substantial, limited attention has been given to these topics in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), particularly the construction industry. This paper presents findings from a questionnaire survey that sought to examine the approaches used by 126 construction organisations to evaluate and justify their IT investments, as well as the benefits and costs that they have experienced due to IT implementation. The analysis of their responses identified three key findings. Firstly, different organisation types significantly differ in the amount they invest in IT and their firm size (in terms of turnover and number of employees) does not influence investment levels in IT. Secondly, the evaluation process adopted by construction SMEs is used as for both control and learning. Thirdly, a major barrier to justifying IT investments was attributed to having no strategic vision. While organisations experienced no significant differences in the tactical and operational benefits incurred after the adoption of IT, differences were found with respect to the strategic benefits. If construction SMEs are to leverage the benefits of IT, then this should form an integral part of their business strategy. Considering this, recommendations for IT evaluation for construction SMEs that are also pertinent for SMEs operating in other industry sectors, are presented.

[1]  D. Remenyi,et al.  Effective Measurement and Management of It Costs and Benefits: Key Issues , 1995 .

[2]  Kit Grindley,et al.  Managing IT at board level , 1995 .

[3]  Andrew Baldwin,et al.  A Framework for Measuring IT Innovation Benefits , 2000, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[4]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value , 1996, MIS Q..

[5]  Jaak Jurison,et al.  Productivity , 2002, Encyclopedia of Information Systems.

[6]  Raymond Y. C. Tse,et al.  An empirical analysis of the barriers to implementing e‐commerce in small‐medium sized construction contractors in the state of Victoria, Australia , 2001 .

[7]  B. Hochstrasser Justifying IT investments , 1994 .

[8]  Geoff Hogbin,et al.  Investing in Information Technology; Managing the Decision-Making Process , 1994 .

[9]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  The Application of Information Technology by Australian Contractors: Toward Process Re-Engineering , 1996 .

[10]  Zahir Irani,et al.  The Propagation of Technology Management Taxonomies for Evaluating Investments in Information Systems , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Wl Currie,et al.  The art of justifying new technology to top management , 1989 .

[12]  Peter Weill,et al.  Managing Investment in Information Technology: Mini Case Examples and Implications , 1989, MIS Q..

[13]  D. Fink,et al.  Guidelines for the Successful Adoption of Information Technology in Small and Medium Enterprises , 1998 .

[14]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  An e‐commerce system for construction material procurement , 2001 .

[15]  Theophanis C. Stratopoulos,et al.  Does successful investment in information technology solve the productivity paradox? , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[16]  Tom Renkema Boekbespreking Farbey, B.; Land, F.; Targett, D.: how to assess your IT investment, a study of methods and practice (Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, 1993) , 1994 .

[17]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Capital budgeting in information systems development , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[18]  Cs Yap,et al.  Information systems success factors in small business , 1992 .

[19]  Kevin J. Stiroh,et al.  Investing in Information Technology: Productivity Payoffs for U.S. Industries , 2005 .

[20]  Michael Sherwood-Smith,et al.  Achieving Maximum Value from Information Systems: A Process Approach , 1997 .

[21]  Z. Irani,et al.  Learning to Reduce Rework in Projects: Analysis of Firm's Organizational Learning and Quality Practices , 2003 .

[22]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  Selection of packaged software in small businesses , 1994 .

[23]  Kaj Grønbæk,et al.  CSCW challenges: cooperative design in engineering projects , 1993, CACM.

[24]  Andrew N. Baldwin,et al.  A Framework for Measuring the Benefits of IT Innovation , 2000 .

[25]  Roger Flanagan,et al.  Measuring the costs and benefits of information technology in construction , 2000 .

[26]  Tony Elliman,et al.  Electronic commerce to support construction design and supply‐chain management: a research note , 2000 .

[27]  Chris Sauer,et al.  Steps to the future : fresh thinking on the management of IT-based organizational transformation , 1997 .

[28]  M. H. Small,et al.  Investment justification of advanced manufacturing technology: An empirical analysis , 1995 .

[29]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Investing in information systems: evaluation and management , 1995 .

[30]  Ali R. Montazemi,et al.  Factors Affecting Information Satisfaction in the Context of the Small Business Environment , 1988, MIS Q..

[31]  B. Hochstrasser,et al.  Controlling It Investment: Strategy and Management , 1992 .

[32]  BrynjolfssonErik The productivity paradox of information technology , 1993 .

[33]  D. Remenyi Achieving maximum value from information systems , 1997 .

[34]  Joan A. Ballantine,et al.  How to assess your IT investment: A study of methods and practice: B Farbey, F Land and D Targett Butterworth-Heinemann (1993) 158 pp £19.99 ISBN 0 7506 0654 1 , 1995, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Linda Duxbury The corporation of the 1990s: Information technology and organizational transformation , 1993 .

[36]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The productivity paradox of information technology , 1993, CACM.

[37]  Arun Rai,et al.  Technology investment and business performance , 1997, CACM.

[38]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Transforming failure into success through organisational learning: an analysis of a manufacturing information system , 2001, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[39]  John Thorp,et al.  The Information Paradox: Realizing the Business Benefits of Information Technology , 1999 .

[40]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Information systems evaluation: navigating through the problem domain , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[41]  Egon Berghout,et al.  Methodologies for investment evaluation: a review and assessment , 2001 .

[42]  P. David The Dynamo and the Computer: An Historical Perspective on the Modern Productivity Paradox , 1990 .

[43]  L AltyJ Information Technology and the Construction Industry:Another Tower of Babel ? , 1993 .

[44]  Jurgen Ringbeck,et al.  Do It Smart: Seven Rules for Superior Information Technology Performance , 1999 .

[45]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Evaluating Information Technology investments: research findings and reappraisal , 1992, Inf. Syst. J..

[46]  Cynthia S. McCahon,et al.  Strategic information systems and competitiveness: Are firms ready for an IST-driven competitive challenge? , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[47]  Y. Braunstein,et al.  Information management , 1996 .

[48]  Chad Lin,et al.  IS/IT Benefits Realisation and Management in Large Australian Organisations , 2000 .

[49]  Martin Betts Strategic management of IT in construction , 1999 .

[50]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending , 1996 .

[51]  Philip Powell,et al.  Firm Size and the Evaluation of Information Systems: Issues and Evidence , 1996, European Conference on Information Systems.

[52]  Georgios I. Doukidis,et al.  Trends in information technology in small businesses , 1994 .