A Dynamical Systems Approach to the Theory of Circumbinary Orbits in the Circular Restricted Problem

To better understand the orbital dynamics of exoplanets around close binary stars, i.e., circumbinary planets (CBPs), we applied techniques from dynamical systems theory to a physically motivated set of solutions in the Circular Restricted Three-Body Problem (CR3BP). We applied Floquet theory to characterize the linear dynamical behavior—static, oscillatory, or exponential—surrounding planar circumbinary periodic trajectories (limit cycles). We computed prograde and retrograde limit cycles and analyzed their geometries, stability bifurcations, and dynamical structures. Orbit and stability calculations are exact computations in the CR3BP and reproducible through the open-source Python package pyraa. The periodic trajectories (doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7532982) produce a set of noncrossing, dynamically cool circumbinary orbits conducive to planetesimal growth. For mass ratios μ ∈ [0.01, 0.50], we found recurring features in the prograde families. These features include (1) an innermost near-circular trajectory, inside which solutions have resonant geometries, (2) an innermost stable trajectory (a c ≈ 1.61 − 1.85 a bin) characterized by a tangent bifurcating limit cycle, and (3) a region of dynamical instability (a ≈ 2.1 a bin; Δa ≈ 0.1 a bin), the exclusion zone, bounded by a pair of critically stable trajectories bifurcating limit cycles. The exterior boundary of the exclusion zone is consistent with prior determinations of a c around a circular binary. We validate our analytic results with N-body simulations and apply them to the Pluto–Charon system. The absence of detected CBPs in the inner stable region, between the prograde exclusion zone and a c , suggests that the exclusion zone may inhibit the inward migration of CBPs.

[1]  S. Lubow Forced eccentricity in circumbinary discs , 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[2]  K. Howell,et al.  Four-body cislunar quasi-periodic orbits and their application to ballistic lunar transfer design , 2022, Advances in Space Research.

[3]  Gongjie Li,et al.  Low Spin-Axis Variations of Circumbinary Planets , 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[4]  S. Kenyon,et al.  A Pluto–Charon Sonata IV. Improved Constraints on the Dynamical Behavior and Masses of the Small Satellites , 2022, The Astronomical Journal.

[5]  R. Nelson,et al.  Dusty circumbinary discs: inner cavity structures and stopping locations of migrating planets , 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[6]  G. Chauvin,et al.  A wide-orbit giant planet in the high-mass b Centauri binary system , 2021, Nature.

[7]  K. Howell,et al.  Leveraging quasi-periodic orbits for trajectory design in cislunar space , 2021 .

[8]  J. Crepp,et al.  California Legacy Survey. II. Occurrence of Giant Planets beyond the Ice Line , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[9]  Joseph E. Rodriguez,et al.  TIC 172900988: A Transiting Circumbinary Planet Detected in One Sector of TESS Data , 2021, The Astronomical Journal.

[10]  S. Kenyon,et al.  A Pluto–Charon Concerto. II. Formation of a Circumbinary Disk of Debris after the Giant Impact , 2021, The Astronomical Journal.

[11]  S. Kenyon,et al.  A Pluto–Charon Concerto: An Impact on Charon as the Origin of the Small Satellites , 2020, The Astronomical Journal.

[12]  Jaime Fern'andez del R'io,et al.  Array programming with NumPy , 2020, Nature.

[13]  M. Lee,et al.  A Numerical Method for Determining the Elements of Circumbinary Orbits and Its Application to Circumbinary Planets and the Satellites of Pluto-Charon , 2020, The Astronomical Journal.

[14]  M. Gupta Finding Order in Chaos: Resonant Orbits and Poincaré Sections , 2020 .

[15]  Rebecca G. Martin,et al.  Polar planets around highly eccentric binaries are the most stable , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[16]  Joel Nothman,et al.  SciPy 1.0-Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python , 2019, ArXiv.

[17]  S. Lubow,et al.  Orbital dynamics of circumbinary planets , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[18]  K. Kratter,et al.  Instabilities in multiplanet circumbinary systems , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[19]  S. Kenyon,et al.  A Pluto–Charon Sonata: The Dynamical Architecture of the Circumbinary Satellite System , 2018, The Astronomical Journal.

[20]  W. Kley,et al.  Migration of planets in circumbinary discs , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[21]  David P. Fleming,et al.  Exo-Milankovitch Cycles. II. Climates of G-dwarf Planets in Dynamically Hot Systems , 2018, The Astronomical Journal.

[22]  M. Lee,et al.  On the Early In Situ Formation of Pluto’s Small Satellites , 2018, 1803.02005.

[23]  N. Kaib,et al.  Stability Limits of Circumbinary Planets: Is There a Pile-up in the Kepler CBPs? , 2018, 1802.08868.

[24]  Daniel J. Scheeres,et al.  Fully Numerical Methods for Continuing Families of Quasi-Periodic Invariant Tori in Astrodynamics , 2018 .

[25]  J. Farihi,et al.  A circumbinary debris disk in a polluted white dwarf system , 2016, Nature Astronomy.

[26]  Natasha Bosanac,et al.  Leveraging natural dynamical structures to explore multi-body systems , 2016 .

[27]  Siu Kwan Lam,et al.  Numba: a LLVM-based Python JIT compiler , 2015, LLVM '15.

[28]  K. Walsh,et al.  FORMATION AND EVOLUTION OF PLUTO’S SMALL SATELLITES , 2015, 1505.01208.

[29]  K. Howell,et al.  Stability of orbits near large mass ratio binary systems , 2015 .

[30]  M. Showalter,et al.  The orbits and masses of satellites of Pluto , 2015 .

[31]  Joshua N. Winn,et al.  The Occurrence and Architecture of Exoplanetary Systems , 2014, 1410.4199.

[32]  S. Peale,et al.  On the origin of Pluto’s small satellites by resonant transport , 2014, 1407.1059.

[33]  F. Faedi,et al.  On the abundance of circumbinary planets , 2014, 1404.5617.

[34]  H. Rein,et al.  REBOUND: An open-source multi-purpose N-body code for collisional dynamics , 2011, 1110.4876.

[35]  K. Blundell,et al.  The dynamics and stability of circumbinary orbits , 2011, 1108.4144.

[36]  R. Canup,et al.  ON A GIANT IMPACT ORIGIN OF CHARON, NIX, AND HYDRA , 2011 .

[37]  Thomas A. Pavlak Mission design applications in the Earth-Moon system: Transfer trajectories and stationkeeping , 2010 .

[38]  Cody R. Short,et al.  Lagrangian coherent structures in the Circular Restricted Three-Body Problem , 2010 .

[39]  Russel J. White,et al.  A SURVEY OF STELLAR FAMILIES: MULTIPLICITY OF SOLAR-TYPE STARS , 2009, 1007.0414.

[40]  R. Canup,et al.  Forced Resonant Migration of Pluto's Outer Satellites by Charon , 2006, Science.

[41]  S. Peale,et al.  On the orbits and masses of the satellites of the Pluto–Charon system , 2006, astro-ph/0603214.

[42]  H. Weaver,et al.  Discovery of two new satellites of Pluto , 2006, Nature.

[43]  R. Canup,et al.  A Giant Impact Origin of Pluto-Charon , 2005, Science.

[44]  J. Lissauer,et al.  Symplectic Integrator Algorithms for Modeling Planetary Accretion in Binary Star Systems , 2002 .

[45]  M. Holman,et al.  Long-Term Stability of Planets in Binary Systems , 1996, astro-ph/9809315.

[46]  L. Hiday Optimal transfers between libration-point orbits in the elliptic restricted three-body problem , 1992 .

[47]  L. Perko Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems , 1991 .

[48]  R. Broucke,et al.  Stability of periodic orbits in the elliptic restricted three-body problem. , 1969 .

[49]  V. Szebehely,et al.  Theory of Orbits: The Restricted Problem of Three Bodies , 1967 .

[50]  A. Roy,et al.  On the Occurrence of Commensurable Mean Motions in the Solar System: The Mirror Theorem , 1955 .

[51]  Monroe H. Martin The restricted problem of three bodies , 1942 .

[52]  E. Stromgren Periodic Orbits in the Restricted Problem of Three Bodies in Their Relation to Hill's Work on the Motion of the Moon , 1938 .

[53]  Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques,et al.  Annales scientifiques de ľÉcole Normale Supérieure , 1893 .

[54]  G. Floquet,et al.  Sur les équations différentielles linéaires à coefficients périodiques , 1883 .