Patient-specific dose estimation for pediatric abdomen-pelvis CT

The purpose of this study is to develop a method for estimating patient-specific dose from abdomen-pelvis CT examinations and to investigate dose variation across patients in the same weight group. Our study consisted of seven pediatric patients in the same weight/protocol group, for whom full-body computer models were previously created based on the patients' CT data obtained for clinical indications. Organ and effective dose of these patients from an abdomen-pelvis scan protocol (LightSpeed VCT scanner, 120-kVp, 85-90 mA, 0.4-s gantry rotation period, 1.375-pitch, 40-mm beam collimation, and small body scan field-of-view) was calculated using a Monte Carlo program previously developed and validated for the same CT system. The seven patients had effective dose of 2.4-2.8 mSv, corresponding to normalized effective dose of 6.6-8.3 mSv/100mAs (coefficient of variation: 7.6%). Dose variations across the patients were small for large organs in the scan coverage (mean: 6.6%; range: 4.9%-9.2%), larger for small organs in the scan coverage (mean: 10.3%; range: 1.4%-15.6%), and the largest for organs partially or completely outside the scan coverage (mean: 14.8%; range: 5.7%-27.7%). Normalized effective dose correlated strongly with body weight (correlation coefficient: r = -0.94). Normalized dose to the kidney and the adrenal gland correlated strongly with mid-liver equivalent diameter (kidney: r = -0.97; adrenal glands: r = -0.98). Normalized dose to the small intestine correlated strongly with mid-intestine equivalent diameter (r = -0.97). These strong correlations suggest that patient-specific dose may be estimated for any other child in the same size group who undergoes the abdomen-pelvis scan.

[1]  Ying Zhang,et al.  Fundamentals of Biostatistics , 2007 .

[2]  J. Baró,et al.  PENELOPE: An algorithm for Monte Carlo simulation of the penetration and energy loss of electrons and positrons in matter , 1995 .

[3]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Patient-specific dose estimation for pediatric chest CT. , 2008, Medical physics.

[4]  Willi A. Kalender,et al.  Validation of a Monte Carlo tool for patient-specific dose simulations in multi-slice computed tomography , 2008, European Radiology.

[5]  D J Brenner,et al.  Effective dose: a flawed concept that could and should be replaced. , 2008, The British journal of radiology.

[6]  J. Valentin.  Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: reference values , 2002, Annals of the ICRP.

[7]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[8]  B.M.W. Tsui,et al.  Extension of the 4D NCAT phantom to dynamic X-ray CT simulation , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[9]  J J DeMarco,et al.  Estimating radiation doses from multidetector CT using Monte Carlo simulations: effects of different size voxelized patient models on magnitudes of organ and effective dose , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Experimental benchmarking of a Monte Carlo dose simulation code for pediatric CT , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[11]  Donald P. Frush,et al.  The ‘Image Gently’ campaign: increasing CT radiation dose awareness through a national education and awareness program , 2008, Pediatric Radiology.

[12]  F. Spiers,et al.  Photoelectron enhancement of the absorbed dose from X rays to human bone marrow: experimental and theoretical studies. , 1985, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  Jacob Geleijns,et al.  Overranging in multisection CT: quantification and relative contribution to dose--comparison of four 16-section CT scanners. , 2007, Radiology.