Model Selection for Exposure-Mediator Interaction.

In mediation analysis, the exposure often influences the mediating effect, i.e., there is an interaction between exposure and mediator on the dependent variable. When the mediator is high-dimensional, it is necessary to identify non-zero mediators (M) and exposure-by-mediator (X-by-M) interactions. Although several high-dimensional mediation methods can naturally handle X-by-M interactions, research is scarce in preserving the underlying hierarchical structure between the main effects and the interactions. To fill the knowledge gap, we develop the XMInt procedure to select M and X-by-M interactions in the high-dimensional mediators setting while preserving the hierarchical structure. Our proposed method employs a sequential regularization-based forward-selection approach to identify the mediators and their hierarchically preserved interaction with exposure. Our numerical experiments showed promising selection results. Further, we applied our method to ADNI morphological data and examined the role of cortical thickness and subcortical volumes on the effect of amyloid-beta accumulation on cognitive performance, which could be helpful in understanding the brain compensation mechanism.

[1]  Haixiang Zhang,et al.  Mediation analysis for survival data with high-dimensional mediators , 2021, Bioinform..

[2]  Daniel J Schaid,et al.  Penalized models for analysis of multiple mediators , 2020, Genetic epidemiology.

[3]  Yang Wang,et al.  High-dimensional mediation analysis in survival models , 2020, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  J. Posner,et al.  The association between antidepressant treatment and brain connectivity in two double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials: a treatment mechanism study. , 2019, The lancet. Psychiatry.

[5]  Huilin Li,et al.  Estimating and testing the microbial causal mediation effect with high-dimensional and compositional microbiome data , 2019, bioRxiv.

[6]  Daniel L. Oberski,et al.  Exploratory Mediation Analysis with Many Potential Mediators , 2018, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal.

[7]  Martin A. Lindquist,et al.  Sparse principal component based high-dimensional mediation analysis , 2018, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[8]  Linda Valeri,et al.  Decomposition of the Total Effect in the Presence of Multiple Mediators and Interactions. , 2018, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  Po-Hsien Huang,et al.  Selecting Path Models in SEM: A Comparison of Model Selection Criteria , 2017 .

[10]  Sarfaraz Serang,et al.  Exploratory Mediation Analysis via Regularization , 2017, Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal.

[11]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Estimating and testing high-dimensional mediation effects in epigenetic studies , 2016, Bioinform..

[12]  J. Trojanowski,et al.  METHOD COMPARISON OF AB(1-42) MEASURED IN HUMAN CEREBROSPINAL FLUID SAMPLES BY LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY-TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY, THE INNO-BIA ALZBIO3 ASSAY, AND THE ELECSYS® B-AMYLOID(1-42) ASSAY , 2016, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[13]  K. Blennow,et al.  Technical performance of a novel, fully automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for the quantitation of β-amyloid (1–42) in human cerebrospinal fluid , 2016, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[14]  Xi Luo,et al.  Pathway Lasso: Estimate and Select Sparse Mediation Pathways with High Dimensional Mediators , 2016, 1603.07749.

[15]  Yang Feng,et al.  Model Selection for High-Dimensional Quadratic Regression via Regularization , 2014, 1501.00049.

[16]  Ning Hao,et al.  A Note on High-Dimensional Linear Regression With Interactions , 2014, 1412.7138.

[17]  S. Vansteelandt,et al.  Causal Mediation Analysis with Multiple Mediators , 2014, Biometrics.

[18]  T. VanderWeele A unification of mediation and interaction: a 4-way decomposition. , 2014, Epidemiology.

[19]  Cindee M. Madison,et al.  Cortical thickness mediates the effect of β-amyloid on episodic memory , 2014, Neurology.

[20]  T J VanderWeele,et al.  Mediation Analysis with Multiple Mediators , 2014, Epidemiologic methods.

[21]  Surajit Ray,et al.  BIC and Alternative Bayesian Information Criteria in the Selection of Structural Equation Models , 2014, Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal.

[22]  K. Imai,et al.  Identification and Sensitivity Analysis for Multiple Causal Mechanisms: Revisiting Evidence from Framing Experiments , 2013, Political Analysis.

[23]  Philip S. Insel,et al.  Development and assessment of a composite score for memory in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) , 2012, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[24]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  A LASSO FOR HIERARCHICAL INTERACTIONS. , 2012, Annals of statistics.

[25]  T. VanderWeele Controlled Direct and Mediated Effects: Definition, Identification and Bounds , 2010, Scandinavian journal of statistics, theory and applications.

[26]  Ji Zhu,et al.  Variable Selection With the Strong Heredity Constraint and Its Oracle Property , 2010 .

[27]  L. Keele,et al.  Identification, Inference and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects , 2010, 1011.1079.

[28]  H. Zou,et al.  Structured variable selection and estimation , 2009, 1011.0610.

[29]  P. Zhao,et al.  The composite absolute penalties family for grouped and hierarchical variable selection , 2009, 0909.0411.

[30]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[31]  M. Sobel Identification of Causal Parameters in Randomized Studies With Mediating Variables , 2008 .

[32]  D. Mackinnon Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis , 2008 .

[33]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[34]  A. Dale,et al.  Whole Brain Segmentation Automated Labeling of Neuroanatomical Structures in the Human Brain , 2002, Neuron.

[35]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Direct and Indirect Effects , 2001, UAI.

[36]  J. Robins,et al.  Identifiability and Exchangeability for Direct and Indirect Effects , 1992, Epidemiology.

[37]  P. Holland CAUSAL INFERENCE, PATH ANALYSIS AND RECURSIVE STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS MODELS , 1988 .

[38]  D. Haughton On the Choice of a Model to Fit Data from an Exponential Family , 1988 .

[39]  Jing Hao Figure , 1972, Analysing Scientific Discourse From a Systemic Functional Linguistic Perspective.

[40]  Lujun Zhang,et al.  Regularized multiple mediation analysis , 2021, Statistics and Its Interface.

[41]  J. Böhnke Explanation in causal inference: Methods for mediation and interaction. , 2016, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[42]  S. Vansteelandt Tyler VanderWeele * and Stijn Vansteelandt Mediation Analysis with Multiple Mediators , 2013 .

[43]  P. F. Juckem Hydrogeologic Characteristics of the St. Croix River Basin, Minnesota and Wisconsin: Implications for the Susceptibility of Ground Water to Potential Contamination , 2007 .

[44]  Dominique Haughton,et al.  Information and other criteria in structural equation model selection , 1997 .

[45]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[46]  J. Nelder A Reformulation of Linear Models , 1977 .

[47]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Least angle regression , 2004, math/0406456.