Nanometer‐Scale Mapping of Elastic Modules in Biogenic Composites: The Nacre of Mollusk Shells

In this study, a newly developed nanoscale modulus mapping is applied in order to visualize the 2D-distribution of mechanical characteristics in the aragonitic nacre layer of Perna canaliculus (green mussel) shells. Modulus maps provide lateral resolution of about 10 nm. They allow the aragonitic mineral (CaCO 3 ) tablets and the interfaces between them to be clearly resolved, which are filled by an organic substance (mainly beta-chitin). The experimental data are compared with finite element simulations that also take into account the tip radius of curvature and the thickness of organic layers, as measured by means of scanning electron microscopy with backscattered electrons. Based on this comparison, the Young modulus of beta-chitin is extracted. The obtained number, E β = 40 GPa, is higher than previously evaluated. The collected maps reveal that the elastic modules in the nacre layer change gradually across the ceramic/organic interfaces within a spatial range four times wider than the thickness of the organic layers. This is possibly due to inhomogeneous distribution of organic macromolecules within ceramic tablets. According to the data, the concentration of macromolecules gradually increases when approaching the organic/ceramic interfaces. A behavior of this type is unique to biogenic materials and distinguishes them from synthetic composite materials. Finally, three possible mechanisms that attempt to explain why gradual changes of elastic modules significantly enhance the overall resistance to fracture of the nacre layer are briefly discussed. The experimental findings support the idea that individual ceramic tablets, comprising the nacre, are built of the compositionally and functionally graded ceramic material. This sheds additional light on the origin ofthe superior mechanical properties of biogenic composites.

[1]  F. Barthelat,et al.  On the mechanics of mother-of-pearl: a key feature in the material hierarchical structure , 2007 .

[2]  D. Shilo,et al.  Modulus mapping of nanoscale closure variants in Ni–Mn–Ga , 2008 .

[3]  James C. Weaver,et al.  Micromechanical properties of biological silica in skeletons of deep-sea sponges , 2006 .

[4]  S. Weiner,et al.  Design strategies in mineralized biological materials , 1997 .

[5]  Horacio Dante Espinosa,et al.  Mechanical properties of nacre constituents and their impact on mechanical performance , 2006 .

[6]  Doron Shilo,et al.  High sensitivity nanoscale mapping of elastic moduli , 2006 .

[7]  K. Katti,et al.  Dynamic nanomechanical response of nacre , 2006 .

[8]  A K Soh,et al.  Structural and mechanical properties of the organic matrix layers of nacre. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[9]  E. Zolotoyabko,et al.  Biomineralization of calcium carbonate: structural aspects , 2007 .

[10]  P. Fratzl,et al.  Hindered Crack Propagation in Materials with Periodically Varying Young's Modulus—Lessons from Biological Materials , 2007 .

[11]  J. Quintana,et al.  Anisotropic lattice distortions in biogenic aragonite , 2004, Nature materials.

[12]  Peter Fratzl,et al.  Bone fracture: When the cracks begin to show. , 2008, Nature materials.

[13]  Zhigang Suo,et al.  Model for the robust mechanical behavior of nacre , 2001 .

[14]  K. Katti,et al.  Why is nacre so tough and strong , 2006 .

[15]  Robert M. Panas,et al.  Nanoscale Morphology and Indentation of Individual Nacre Tablets from the Gastropod Mollusc Trochus Niloticus , 2005 .

[16]  M. Boyce,et al.  Nanoscale anisotropic plastic deformation in single crystal aragonite. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[17]  J. Vincent,et al.  Design and mechanical properties of insect cuticle. , 2004, Arthropod structure & development.

[18]  M. Fritz,et al.  Correlation of the orientation of stacked aragonite platelets in nacre and their connection via mineral bridges. , 2009, Ultramicroscopy.

[19]  K. Katti,et al.  Modeling microarchitecture and mechanical behavior of nacre using 3D finite element techniques Part I Elastic properties , 2001 .

[20]  F. Meldrum.  Calcium carbonate in biomineralisation and biomimetic chemistry , 2003 .

[21]  Richard Weinkamer,et al.  Nature’s hierarchical materials , 2007 .

[22]  Xiaodong Li,et al.  Unveiling the formation mechanism of pseudo-single-crystal aragonite platelets in nacre. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[23]  Horacio Dante Espinosa,et al.  An elasto-viscoplastic interface model for investigating the constitutive behavior of nacre , 2007 .

[24]  Steve Weiner,et al.  THE MATERIAL BONE: Structure-Mechanical Function Relations , 1998 .

[25]  E. Zolotoyabko,et al.  Nacre in Mollusk Shells as a Multilayered Structure with Strain Gradient , 2009 .

[26]  Kathryn J. Wahl,et al.  Quantitative imaging of nanoscale mechanical properties using hybrid nanoindentation and force modulation , 2001 .

[27]  K. Nakamae,et al.  Elastic modulus of the crystalline regions of chitin and chitosan , 1999 .

[28]  S. Suresh,et al.  Graded Materials for Resistance to Contact Deformation and Damage , 2001, Science.

[29]  S. Sinha,et al.  Scratch and indentation tests on seashells , 2009 .

[30]  Marina Silveira,et al.  Studies on molluscan shells: contributions from microscopic and analytical methods. , 2009, Micron.

[31]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Materials become insensitive to flaws at nanoscale: Lessons from nature , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  A. P. Jackson,et al.  The mechanical design of nacre , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[33]  D. Shilo,et al.  Investigation of interface properties by nanoscale elastic modulus mapping. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[34]  Mario Viani,et al.  Molecular mechanistic origin of the toughness of natural adhesives, fibres and composites , 1999, Nature.

[35]  P. L. Lee,et al.  On the structure of aragonite. , 2005, Acta crystallographica. Section B, Structural science.

[36]  W. Nix.  Elastic and plastic properties of thin films on substrates : nanoindentation techniques , 1997 .

[37]  Yuh J. Chao,et al.  Nanoscale Structural and Mechanical Characterization of a Natural Nanocomposite Material: The Shell of Red Abalone , 2004 .

[38]  Chien-Chih Chen,et al.  Elasticity of single-crystal aragonite by Brillouin spectroscopy , 2005 .

[39]  John D. Currey,et al.  Mechanical properties of mother of pearl in tension , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[40]  Benjamin Marie,et al.  Molluscan shell proteins: primary structure, origin, and evolution. , 2008, Current topics in developmental biology.

[41]  R. Ballarini,et al.  Structural basis for the fracture toughness of the shell of the conch Strombus gigas , 2000, Nature.

[42]  S. Weiner,et al.  Spiers Memorial Lecture. Lessons from biomineralization: comparing the growth strategies of mollusc shell prismatic and nacreous layers in Atrina rigida. , 2003, Faraday discussions.

[43]  Zhiyong Tang,et al.  Nanostructured artificial nacre , 2003, Nature materials.