Customer relationship management systems: implementation risks and relationship dynamics

Addresses variables in the implementation of software applications for aspects of customer relationship management (CRM) systems in medium‐sized organisations. The objective is to identify those variables that present the greatest risks to effective and successful implementation in the light of the operating relationships between the main “actors” in multi‐channel CRM implementation projects. Bases theoretical development on two central themes. The first theme is that any implementation has risks that need to be managed and the second is that the dynamics of the relationships of the main actors are more complex where a system is acquired from external developers than with an internally developed system. Explores these assumptions using qualitative linear case studies, where success or failure has not been established at the start. Derives a model which represents a typical relationship dynamic for a CRM implementation. By establishing the nature of the risks involved within the context of a monitored relationship dynamic offers a framework for guidance in the implementation process.

[1]  David Bawden,et al.  User-centred and user-sensitive, implementation of, and training for, information systems: A case study , 1997 .

[2]  John M. Ward,et al.  Reconciling the IT/business relationship: a troubled marriage in need of guidance , 1996, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[3]  T. Davenport Saving IT's Soul: Human-Centered Information Management. , 1994 .

[4]  Andrea Taylor-Cummings,et al.  Bridging the user-IS gap: a study of major information systems projects , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..

[5]  A. L. M. Cavaye,et al.  The sponsor-adopter gap-differences between promoters and potential users of information systems that link organizations , 1995 .

[6]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  Executive information systems: emergence, development, impact , 1992 .

[7]  J. A. Cannon Why IT Applications Succeed or Fail , 1994 .

[8]  June M. Verner,et al.  Case study: The effect of IS maturity on information systems strategic planning , 1998, Inf. Manag..

[9]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Information System Implementation: Bridging the Gap Between Design and Utilization , 1988 .

[10]  Guy Fitzgerald,et al.  Evaluating information systems projects: a multidimensional approach , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..

[11]  Joan A. Ballantine,et al.  Financial appraisal and the IS/IT investment decision making process , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..

[12]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Client/Server System Success: Exploring the Human Side , 1997 .

[13]  Henri Barki,et al.  Measuring User Participation, User Involvement, and User Attitude , 1994, MIS Q..

[14]  Steven Hornik,et al.  Passive resistance misuse: overt support and covert recalcitrance in IS implementation , 1996 .

[15]  Craig Barrow Implementing an Executive Information System: Seven Steps for Success , 1990 .

[16]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  The adoption and design methodologies of component-based enterprise systems , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[17]  J. Peppard IS/IT management in the global enterprise : a framework for strategic alignment , 1998 .

[18]  Robert P. Marble,et al.  Operationalising the implementation puzzle: an argument for eclecticism in research and in practice , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Mark Lycett,et al.  Evaluating business information systems fit: from concept to practical application , 1999 .

[20]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Beyond the interface: Ease of use and task/technology fit , 1998, Inf. Manag..