Design Optimization of Composite Deployable Bridge Systems Using Hybrid Meta-heuristic Methods for Rapid Post-disaster Mobility

Recent decades have witnessed an increase in the transportation infrastructure damage caused by natural disasters such as earthquakes, high winds, floods, as well as man-made disasters. Such damages result in a disruption to the transportation infrastructure network; hence, limit the post-disaster relief operations. This led to the exigency of developing and using effective deployable bridge systems for rapid post-disaster mobility while minimizing the weight to capacity ratio. Recent researches for assessments of mobile bridging requirements concluded that current deployable metallic bridge systems are prone to their service life, unable to meet the increase in vehicle design loads, and any trials for the structures’ strengthening will sacrifice the ease of mobility. Therefore, this research focuses on developing a lightweight deployable bridge system using composite laminates for lightweight bridging in the aftermath of natural disaster. The research investigates the structural design optimization for composite laminate deployable bridge systems, as well as the design, development and testing of composite sandwich core sections that act as the compression bearing element in a deployable bridge treadway structure. The thesis is organized into two parts. The first part includes a new improved particle swarm meta-heuristic approach capable of effectively optimizing deployable bridge systems. The developed approach is extended to modify the technique for discrete design of composite laminates and maximum strength design of composite sandwich core sections. The second part focuses on developing, experimentally testing and numerically investigating the performance of different sandwich core configurations that will be used as the compression bearing element in a deployable fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) bridge girder. The first part investigated different optimization algorithms used for structural optimization. The uncertainty in the effectiveness of the available methods to handle complex structural models emphasized the need to develop an enhanced version of Particle Swarm Optimizer (PSO) without performing multiple operations using different techniques. The new technique implements a better emulation for the attraction and repulsion behavior of the swarm. The new algorithm is called Controlled Diversity Particle Swarm Optimizer (CD-PSO). The algorithm improved the performance of the classical PSO in terms of solution stability, quality, convergence rate and computational time. The CD-PSO is then hybridized with the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) to redirect the swarm search for probing feasible solutions in hyperspace using only the design parameters of strong influence on the objective function. This is triggered when the algorithm fails to obtain good solutions using CD-PSO. The performance of CD-PSO is tested on benchmark structures and compared to others in the literature. Consequently, both techniques, CD-, and hybrid CD-PSO are examined for the minimum weight design of large-scale deployable bridge structure. Furthermore, a discrete version of the algorithm is created to handle the discrete nature of the composite laminate sandwich core design. The second part focuses on achieving an effective composite deployable bridge system, this is realized through maximizing shear strength, compression strength, and stiffness designs of light-weight composite sandwich cores of the treadway bridge’s compression deck. Different composite sandwich cores are investigated and their progressive failure is numerically evaluated. The performance of the sandwich cores is experimentally tested in terms of flatwise compressive strength, edgewise compressive strength and shear strength capacities. Further, the cores’ compression strength and shear strength capacities are numerically simulated and the results are validated with the experimental work. Based on the numerical and experimental tests findings, the sandwich cores plate properties are quantified for future implementation in optimized scaled deployable bridge treadway.

[1]  Christopher F. Foss,et al.  Jane's military vehicles and logistics , 1993 .

[2]  G. Kovács,et al.  Humanitarian logistics in disaster relief operations , 2007 .

[3]  P. N. Suganthan,et al.  Differential Evolution: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[4]  Yuhui Shi,et al.  Particle swarm optimization: developments, applications and resources , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No.01TH8546).

[5]  Ashley P. Thrall,et al.  Portable and Rapidly Deployable Bridges: Historical Perspective and Recent Technology Developments , 2013 .

[6]  P. Fourie,et al.  The particle swarm optimization algorithm in size and shape optimization , 2002 .

[7]  Miklós Hetényi,et al.  Beams on Elastic Foundation: Theory with Applications in the Fields of Civil and Mechanical Engineering , 1946 .

[8]  Sung-Hyun Jang,et al.  Structural Optimization Based on Static Design Criteria of a Long Span Mobile Bridge Using Genetic Algorithm , 2011 .

[9]  Masatoshi Nakazawa,et al.  Development of a Prototype Deployable Bridge Based on Origami Skill , 2011 .

[10]  Edward J Repetski Assessment of Bridging Requirements and Current Bridging Capabilities for use of Legacy Heavy Forces Inside the Contemporary Operational Environment , 2012 .

[11]  Russell C. Eberhart,et al.  A new optimizer using particle swarm theory , 1995, MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science.

[12]  X. Renwei,et al.  Structural optimization based on second-order approximations of functions and dual theory , 1987 .

[13]  Slawomir Koziel,et al.  Computational Optimization, Methods and Algorithms , 2016, Computational Optimization, Methods and Algorithms.

[14]  Yue Shi,et al.  A modified particle swarm optimizer , 1998, 1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98TH8360).

[15]  A. Kaveh,et al.  A new meta-heuristic method: Ray Optimization , 2012 .

[17]  Branko Glisic,et al.  A novel deployable tied arch bridge , 2014 .

[18]  Gareth R Thomas,et al.  A Rapidly Deployable Bridge System , 2013 .

[20]  A. Kaveh,et al.  Chaotic swarming of particles: A new method for size optimization of truss structures , 2014, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[21]  Julio F. Davalos,et al.  Modeling and characterization of fiber-reinforced plastic honeycomb sandwich panels for highway bridge applications , 2001 .

[22]  W. A. Thornton,et al.  A new optimality criterion method for large scale structures , 1978 .

[23]  Sami H. Rizkalla,et al.  FILAMENT-WOUND GLASS FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER BRIDGE DECK MODULES , 2003 .

[24]  Tanmoy Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Optimisation of Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Web Core Bridge Deck—A Hybrid Approach , 2015 .

[25]  P. S. Huang,et al.  STUDIES ON NEW FORMS OF PORTABLE BRIDGES FOR DISASTER RELIEF , 2013 .

[26]  E. M. Reis,et al.  Innovative 3-d Frp Sandwich Panels for Bridge Decks , 2003 .

[27]  Jan Holnicki-Szulc,et al.  An experimental study on the design method of a real-sized Mobile Bridge for a moving vehicle , 2014 .

[28]  L. Schmit,et al.  Approximation concepts for efficient structural synthesis , 1976 .

[29]  Jacques Riget,et al.  A Diversity-Guided Particle Swarm Optimizer - the ARPSO , 2002 .

[30]  Narasimhan Sundararajan,et al.  Self regulating particle swarm optimization algorithm , 2015, Inf. Sci..

[31]  A. Kaveh,et al.  Size optimization of space trusses using Big Bang-Big Crunch algorithm , 2009 .

[32]  Abdul-Hamid Zureick,et al.  Lightweight composite truss section decking , 2001 .

[33]  M Reyes Sierra,et al.  Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimizers: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art , 2006 .

[34]  J. B. Kosmatka,et al.  Light-Weight Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composite Deck Panels for Extreme Applications , 2008 .

[35]  Michael S. Eldred,et al.  OVERVIEW OF MODERN DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS METHODS FOR COMPUTATIONAL SIMULATIONS , 2003 .

[36]  Siamak Talatahari,et al.  Hybrid Algorithm of Harmony Search, Particle Swarm and Ant Colony for Structural Design Optimization , 2009 .

[37]  Dervis Karaboga,et al.  AN IDEA BASED ON HONEY BEE SWARM FOR NUMERICAL OPTIMIZATION , 2005 .

[38]  Edward J. Haug,et al.  Applied optimal design: Mechanical and structural systems , 1979 .

[39]  O. Weck,et al.  A COMPARISON OF PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION AND THE GENETIC ALGORITHM , 2005 .

[40]  R. Shapiro,et al.  From Logistics to Supply Chain Management , 2000 .

[41]  J. Neter,et al.  Applied Linear Regression Models , 1983 .

[42]  L. Schmit,et al.  Some Approximation Concepts for Structural Synthesis , 1974 .

[43]  Thomas Keller,et al.  GFRP-Balsa Sandwich Bridge Deck: Concept, Design, and Experimental Validation , 2014 .

[44]  V. B. Venkayya,et al.  Optimization of Structures Based on the Study of Energy Distribution , 1968 .

[45]  John R. Koza,et al.  Genetic programming - on the programming of computers by means of natural selection , 1993, Complex adaptive systems.

[46]  Z. Hashin Failure Criteria for Unidirectional Fiber Composites , 1980 .

[47]  Anastasios P. Vassilopoulos,et al.  FRP-Balsa Composite Sandwich Bridge Deck with Complex Core Assembly , 2013 .

[48]  K. Dejong,et al.  An analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic adaptive systems , 1975 .

[49]  Shahram Pezeshk,et al.  Optimized Design of Two-Dimensional Structures Using a Genetic Algorithm , 1998 .

[50]  Thomas Keller,et al.  Quasi-static and fatigue performance of a cellular FRP bridge deck adhesively bonded to steel girders , 2005 .

[51]  V. Venkayya Design of optimum structures , 1971 .

[52]  A. Kaveh,et al.  Enhanced colliding bodies optimization for design problems with continuous and discrete variables , 2014, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[53]  K. Lee,et al.  A new structural optimization method based on the harmony search algorithm , 2004 .

[54]  Kamran Behdinan,et al.  Particle swarm approach for structural design optimization , 2007 .

[55]  M. A. Erki,et al.  Development of FRP Short-Span Deployable Bridge—Experimental Results , 2006 .

[56]  Na Li,et al.  A Diversity Guided Particles Swarm Optimization , 2012 .

[57]  R. A. Gellatly,et al.  Optimal Structural Design. , 1971 .

[58]  Charles V. Camp DESIGN OF SPACE TRUSSES USING BIG BANG–BIG CRUNCH OPTIMIZATION , 2007 .

[59]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  12 – Introduction to Optimum Design with MATLAB , 2004 .

[60]  Alex Bykat Using a Genetic Algorithm to Triangulate , 1999, IIA/SOCO.

[61]  M Winney ON ACTIVE SERVICE , 1994 .

[62]  Ali Kaveh,et al.  Advances in Metaheuristic Algorithms for Optimal Design of Structures , 2014 .

[63]  Feng Liu,et al.  A heuristic particle swarm optimization method for truss structures with discrete variables , 2009 .

[64]  K. Chandrashekhara,et al.  Testing and Evaluation of Polyurethane-Based GFRP Sandwich Bridge Deck Panels with Polyurethane Foam Core , 2016 .

[65]  Donald E. Grierson,et al.  Comparison among five evolutionary-based optimization algorithms , 2005, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[66]  Harun Uğuz,et al.  A novel particle swarm optimization algorithm with Levy flight , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[67]  Ioan Nistor,et al.  Performance of Structures in Indonesia during the December 2004 Great Sumatra Earthquake and Indian Ocean Tsunami , 2006 .

[68]  John J. Lesko,et al.  Laboratory and Field Performance of Cellular Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composite Bridge Deck Systems , 2005 .

[69]  Guan-Chun Luh,et al.  Optimal design of truss-structures using particle swarm optimization , 2011 .

[70]  J. B. Kosmatka,et al.  Experimental Dynamic Response of a Short-Span Composite Bridge to Military Vehicles , 2011 .

[71]  Qilin Zhao,et al.  Flexural properties of a lightweight hybrid FRP-aluminum modular space truss bridge system , 2014 .

[72]  Frieder Seible,et al.  ADVANCED COMPOSITES FOR BRIDGE INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL , 1995 .

[73]  Anthony V. Fiacco,et al.  Nonlinear programming;: Sequential unconstrained minimization techniques , 1968 .

[74]  Azah Mohamed,et al.  A Survey of the State of the Art in Particle Swarm Optimization , 2012 .

[75]  Charles V. Camp,et al.  Design of Space Trusses Using Ant Colony Optimization , 2004 .

[76]  Zihong Liu Testing and Analysis of a Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Bridge Deck , 2007 .

[77]  Magnus Burman,et al.  On design of joints between composite profiles for bridge deck applications , 2001 .

[78]  Franklin A. Graybill,et al.  Introduction to The theory , 1974 .

[79]  Marc J. Robinson Simulation of the vacuum assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM) process and the development of light-weight composite bridging , 2008 .

[80]  Paulo Rizzi,et al.  Optimization of multi-constrained structures based on optimality criteria , 1976 .

[81]  Albert A. Groenwold,et al.  Sizing design of truss structures using particle swarms , 2003 .

[82]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 2003, Springer Series in Statistics.

[83]  M. W. Dobbs,et al.  Application of optimality criteria to automated structural design , 1976 .

[84]  G. N. Labeas FINITE ELEMENT MODELING OF DAMAGE ACCUMULATION IN BOLTED COMPOSITE JOINTS UNDER INCREMENTAL TENSILE LOADING , 2000 .

[85]  Mohamed Yusof Alias,et al.  Dynamic Analysis of Sandwiched Composite Foldable Structure under Heavy Vehicle Load , 2011 .

[86]  J. B. Kosmatka,et al.  Development of a Short-Span Fiber-Reinforced Composite Bridge for Emergency Response and Military Applications , 2008 .

[87]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[88]  Guan-Chun Luh,et al.  Optimal design of truss structures using ant algorithm , 2008 .

[89]  Millie Pant,et al.  A Simple Diversity Guided Particle Swarm Optimization , 2007, 2007 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.