Implementing Innovatory Transport Measures: What Local Authorities in the UK Say About Their Problems and Requirements

There is a growing emphasis on the need to secure an integrated transport system that both serves the needs of the economy and that contributes to a wider sustainability agenda which includes prudent use of natural resources and equitable access to jobs and facilities. Although the UK government has not set specific targets for emission reduction or accessibility for the transport sector, all local highway authorities in England are now required to set out five year programmes with commitments on progress on four national shared priorities, which include the reduction of polluting emissions from transport and improved public transport. Transport practitioners have a key role to ensure that the foundations are laid now for the transport sector to be in a position to offer an integrated, resource efficient transport system in urban areas. Research has indicated that the principal barriers to achieving more sustainable transport strategies are poor policy integration and coordination, counterproductive institutional roles, unsupportive regulatory frameworks, weaknesses in pricing, poor data quality and quantity, limited public support and lack of political resolve. This paper reports on a study examining the efficacy of the decision support tools available to local transport officers to achieve more sustainable transport options in 16 local authorities in the UK. Results from two questionnaires and a series of follow-up interviews are combined over a four year period to identify where significant support to transport officers is needed. The results suggest that technical and financial support is still necessary in the development, appraisal, monitoring and evaluation of integrated, sustainable, urban travel strategies.

[1]  Simon Pemberton,et al.  Institutional governance, scale and transport policy – lessons from Tyne and Wear , 2000 .

[2]  Peter Jones,et al.  Innovative Approaches to Option Generation , 2009 .

[3]  L. Bertolini,et al.  Urban Development without more Mobility by Car? Lessons from Amsterdam, a Multimodal Urban Region , 2003 .

[4]  Geoff Vigar,et al.  Local 'Barriers' to Environmentally Sustainable Transport Planning , 2000 .

[5]  A. Meyer Economics Of Climate Change , 1995, Nature.

[6]  Greg Marsden,et al.  The Role of Indicators, Targets and Monitoring in Decision-Support for Transport , 2009, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research.

[8]  Angela Hull Barriers to the delivery of sustainable transport solutions , 2009 .

[9]  A May,et al.  Improving Decision-making for Sustainable Urban Transport: An Introduction to The DISTILLATE Research Programme , 2009 .

[10]  Paul Pfaffenbichler,et al.  Overcoming Barriers to Model Use , 2009 .

[11]  Bryan Matthews,et al.  Improving Decision-Making for Sustainable Urban Transport , 2007 .

[12]  Angela Hull,et al.  Assessing barriers to sustainable UK urban transport solutions , 2005 .

[13]  J. Forrester Improved Partnership Working for Local Authority Transport Planning , 2009, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research.

[14]  Charlotte Kelly,et al.  Enhancing appraisal methods to support sustainable transport and land use , 2009 .

[15]  A. Hull,et al.  Understanding the Processes of Policy Delivery for Sustainable Urban Transport , 2007 .

[16]  Geoff Vigar,et al.  Planning, Governance and Spatial Strategy in Britain: An Institutionalist Analysis , 2000 .

[17]  Angela Hull,et al.  Sustainable urban environments: Assessing the barriers to sustainable transport solutions , 2005 .

[18]  Angela Hull,et al.  Policy integration: What will it take to achieve more sustainable transport solutions in cities , 2008 .