Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Influence the Speed–Accuracy Tradeoff in Perceptual Decision-making: Evidence from Three Independent Studies
暂无分享,去创建一个
Ludovica Labruna | Richard B. Ivry | Birte U. Forstmann | Roger Ratcliff | Anne C. Trutti | Roberta Sellaro | Lorenza S. Colzato | Gilles de Hollander | R. Ratcliff | R. Ivry | B. Forstmann | L. Colzato | G. Hollander | L. Labruna | R. Sellaro | A. Trutti | Ludovica Labruna
[1] Roger Ratcliff,et al. A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .
[2] Scott D. Brown,et al. Cortico-striatal connections predict control over speed and accuracy in perceptual decision making , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[3] E. Wagenmakers. A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[4] Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al. Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics , 1977 .
[5] Thomas V. Wiecki,et al. fMRI and EEG Predictors of Dynamic Decision Parameters during Human Reinforcement Learning , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[6] K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al. Controlling Your Impulses: Electrical Stimulation of the Human Supplementary Motor Complex Prevents Impulsive Errors , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[7] O. Carter,et al. Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond MEP amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects: A systematic review , 2015, Neuropsychologia.
[8] M. Nitsche,et al. Partially non‐linear stimulation intensity‐dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans , 2013, The Journal of physiology.
[9] Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al. Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions , 1998 .
[10] J. Rothwell,et al. Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex , 2014, Brain Stimulation.
[11] Sven Bestmann,et al. On the Use of Meta-analysis in Neuromodulatory Non-invasive Brain Stimulation , 2015, Brain Stimulation.
[12] Sharna Jamadar,et al. Adjustments of Response Threshold during Task Switching: A Model-Based Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[13] C. Agner. Oxford Handbook of Transcranial Stimulation, 1st Edition , 2008 .
[14] R. Bogacz,et al. The neural basis of the speed–accuracy tradeoff , 2010, Trends in Neurosciences.
[15] C. Im,et al. Inconsistent outcomes of transcranial direct current stimulation may originate from anatomical differences among individuals: Electric field simulation using individual MRI data , 2014, Neuroscience Letters.
[16] Á. Pascual-Leone,et al. The Uncertain Outcome of Prefrontal tDCS , 2014, Brain Stimulation.
[17] Michael J. Frank,et al. Hold your horses: A dynamic computational role for the subthalamic nucleus in decision making , 2006, Neural Networks.
[18] K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al. Striatum and pre-SMA facilitate decision-making under time pressure , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[19] K. Hoffmann,et al. Direct Current Stimulation over V5 Enhances Visuomotor Coordination by Improving Motion Perception in Humans , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[20] Men-Tzung Lo,et al. Revealing the brain's adaptability and the transcranial direct current stimulation facilitating effect in inhibitory control by multiscale entropy , 2014, NeuroImage.
[21] O. Carter,et al. Quantitative Review Finds No Evidence of Cognitive Effects in Healthy Populations From Single-session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) , 2015, Brain Stimulation.
[22] Roger Ratcliff,et al. Individual differences, aging, and IQ in two-choice tasks , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.
[23] B. Cheeran,et al. Inter-individual Variability in Response to Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Paradigms , 2014, Brain Stimulation.
[24] Anthony N. Carlsen,et al. Anodal tDCS over SMA decreases the probability of withholding an anticipated action , 2013, Behavioural Brain Research.
[25] Y. Kwon,et al. Response Inhibition Induced in the Stop-signal Task by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Pre-supplementary Motor Area and Primary Sensoriomotor Cortex , 2013, Journal of physical therapy science.
[26] Alexander Opitz,et al. Physiological observations validate finite element models for estimating subject-specific electric field distributions induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex , 2013, NeuroImage.
[27] W. Newsome,et al. A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT) , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.
[28] M. Shadlen,et al. The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. , 2005, Journal of vision.
[29] J. Movshon,et al. The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.
[30] M. Hallett,et al. Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[31] Robert L. Mason,et al. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 2003 .
[32] Cameron S. Carter,et al. The Neural and Computational Basis of Controlled Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff during Task Performance , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[33] Roger Ratcliff,et al. Individual Differences and Fitting Methods for the Two-Choice Diffusion Model of Decision Making. , 2015, Decision.
[34] J. Gold,et al. The Influence of Behavioral Context on the Representation of a Perceptual Decision in Developing Oculomotor Commands , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[35] Andreas Voss,et al. Fast-dm: A free program for efficient diffusion model analysis , 2007, Behavior research methods.
[36] M. Nitsche,et al. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.
[37] K. Jellinger. Oxford Handbook of Transcranial Stimulation , 2009 .
[38] R. Ratcliff,et al. Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[39] S. Rossi,et al. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[40] Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al. Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs , 2012 .
[42] M. Nitsche,et al. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans , 2001, Neurology.
[43] R. Ratcliff,et al. Sequential Sampling Models in Cognitive Neuroscience: Advantages, Applications, and Extensions. , 2016, Annual review of psychology.
[44] R. Ratcliff,et al. Bias in the Brain: A Diffusion Model Analysis of Prior Probability and Potential Payoff , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[45] Roger Ratcliff,et al. The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.
[46] R. Ratcliff. Modeling response signal and response time data , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.
[47] M. Koslowsky,et al. tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.
[48] C. Epstein,et al. The Oxford handbook of transcranial stimulation , 2012 .
[49] Brian E. Granger,et al. IPython: A System for Interactive Scientific Computing , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.
[50] R. Marois,et al. fMRI Evidence for a Dual Process Account of the Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff in Decision-Making , 2008, PloS one.
[51] J. Gold,et al. The neural basis of decision making. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.
[52] Birte U. Forstmann,et al. Piéron’s Law and Optimal Behavior in Perceptual Decision-Making , 2012, Front. Neurosci..
[53] B. J. Winer. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .
[54] Walter Paulus,et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation--update 2011. , 2011, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.
[55] Neil G. Muggleton,et al. Modulating inhibitory control with direct current stimulation of the superior medial frontal cortex , 2011, NeuroImage.
[56] Birte U. Forstmann,et al. Trial-by-trial fluctuations in CNV amplitude reflect anticipatory adjustment of response caution , 2014, NeuroImage.
[57] Alkomiet Hasan,et al. Efficacy and Interindividual Variability in Motor-Cortex Plasticity following Anodal tDCS and Paired-Associative Stimulation , 2015, Neural plasticity.
[58] Scott D. Brown,et al. Neural Correlates of Trial-to-Trial Fluctuations in Response Caution , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.