Infants Show Ratio-dependent Number Discrimination Regardless of Set Size.

Evidence for approximate number system (ANS) representations in infancy is robust but has typically only been found when infants are presented with arrays of four or more elements. In addition, several studies have found that infants fail to discriminate between small numbers when continuous variables such as surface area and contour length are controlled. These findings suggest that under some circumstances, infants fail to recruit either the ANS or object file representations for small sets. Here, we used a numerical change detection paradigm to assess 6-month-old infants' ability to represent small values. In Experiment 1, infants were tested with 1 versus 3, 1 versus 2, and 2 versus 3 dots. Infants successfully discriminated 1 versus 3 and 1 versus 2, but failed with 2 versus 3. In Experiment 2, we tested whether infants could compare small and large values with a 2 versus 4 condition. Across both experiments, infants' performance exhibited ratio dependence, the hallmark of the ANS. Our results indicate that infants can attend to the purely numerical attributes of small sets and that the numerical change detection paradigm accesses ANS representations in infancy regardless of set size.

[1]  Fei Xu,et al.  Numerosity discrimination in infants: Evidence for two systems of representations , 2003, Cognition.

[2]  David Barner,et al.  Does the conceptual distinction between singular and plural sets depend on language? , 2009, Developmental psychology.

[3]  Paul Bloom,et al.  Enumeration of collective entities by 5-month-old infants , 2002, Cognition.

[4]  S. Carey,et al.  On the limits of infants' quantification of small object arrays , 2005, Cognition.

[5]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  Amount Versus Number: Infants' Use of Area and Contour Length to Discriminate Small Sets , 2001 .

[6]  E. Spelke,et al.  Infants' Discrimination of Number vs. Continuous Extent , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbers , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  Daniel C. Hyde,et al.  Spatial Attention Determines the Nature of Nonverbal Number Representation , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Karen Wynn,et al.  Infants' Individuation and Enumeration of Actions , 1996 .

[10]  Lisa Feigenson,et al.  Tracking individuals via object-files: evidence from infants' manual search , 2003 .

[11]  E. Spelke,et al.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 2000, Cognition.

[12]  H S Terrace,et al.  Ordering of the numerosities 1 to 9 by monkeys. , 1998, Science.

[13]  Justin N. Wood,et al.  Evidence for a non-linguistic distinction between singular and plural sets in rhesus monkeys , 2008, Cognition.

[14]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Origins of Number Sense , 2003, Psychological science.

[15]  J. Colombo,et al.  Your Eyes Say "No," But Your Heart Says "Yes": Behavioral and Psychophysiological Indices in Infant Quantitative Processing. , 2011, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[16]  S. Luck,et al.  The development of visual short-term memory capacity in infants. , 2003, Child development.

[17]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[18]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  The multisensory representation of number in infancy. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Fei Xu,et al.  Number sense in human infants. , 2005, Developmental science.

[20]  David Barner,et al.  On the relation between the acquisition of singular-plural morpho-syntax and the conceptual distinction between one and more than one. , 2007, Developmental science.

[21]  Sara Cordes,et al.  The relative salience of discrete and continuous quantity in young infants. , 2009, Developmental science.

[22]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Stable individual differences in number discrimination in infancy. , 2010, Developmental science.

[23]  S. Carey,et al.  The Representations Underlying Infants' Choice of More: Object Files Versus Analog Magnitudes , 2002, Psychological science.

[24]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Induced Alpha-band Oscillations Reflect Ratio-dependent Number Discrimination in the Infant Brain , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Neural signatures of number processing in human infants: evidence for two core systems underlying numerical cognition. , 2011, Developmental science.