Test and Evaluation of ff99IDPs Force Field for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Over 40% of eukaryotic proteomic sequences have been predicted to be intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) or intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) and confirmed to be associated with many diseases. However, widely used force fields cannot well reproduce the conformers of IDPs. Previously the ff99IDPs force field was released to simulate IDPs with CMAP energy corrections for the eight disorder-promoting residues. In order to further confirm the performance of ff99IDPs, three representative IDP systems (arginine-rich HIV-1 Rev, aspartic proteinase inhibitor IA3, and α-synuclein) were used to test and evaluate the simulation results. The results show that for free disordered proteins, the chemical shifts from the ff99IDPs simulations are in quantitative agreement with those from reported NMR measurements and better than those from ff99SBildn. Thus, ff99IDPs can sample more clusters of disordered conformers than ff99SBildn. For structural proteins, both ff99IDPs and ff99SBildn can well reproduce the conformations. In general, ff99IDPs can successfully be used to simulate the conformations of IDPs and IDRs in both bound and free states. However, relative errors could still be found at the boundaries of ordered residues scattered in long disorder-promoting sequences. Therefore, polarizable force fields might be one of the possible ways to further improve the performance on IDPs.

[1]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: Limitations of gas‐phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[2]  I. Duncan,et al.  HIV protease genotype and viral sensitivity to HIV protease inhibitors following saquinavir therapy , 1998, AIDS.

[3]  L. Iakoucheva,et al.  Intrinsic Disorder and Protein Function , 2002 .

[4]  T. Chouard,et al.  Structural biology: Breaking the protein rules , 2011, Nature.

[5]  A Keith Dunker,et al.  Intrinsically disordered proteins and intrinsically disordered protein regions. , 2014, Annual review of biochemistry.

[6]  Sonia Longhi,et al.  What’s in a name? Why these proteins are intrinsically disordered , 2013, Intrinsically disordered proteins.

[7]  G. Sal,et al.  p53-family proteins and their regulators: hubs and spokes in tumor suppression , 2010, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[8]  Michele Vendruscolo,et al.  Prediction of "aggregation-prone" and "aggregation-susceptible" regions in proteins associated with neurodegenerative diseases. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  Duncan Poole,et al.  Routine Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 2. Explicit Solvent Particle Mesh Ewald. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[10]  R. A. Crowther,et al.  Multiple isoforms of human microtubule-associated protein tau: sequences and localization in neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer's disease , 1989, Neuron.

[11]  V. Bystrov Spin—spin coupling and the conformational states of peptide systems , 1976 .

[12]  R. Dror,et al.  Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field , 2010, Proteins.

[13]  M. Hennig,et al.  The arginine-rich RNA-binding motif of HIV-1 Rev is intrinsically disordered and folds upon RRE binding. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[14]  D. Hudson,et al.  Analysis of arginine-rich peptides from the HIV Tat protein reveals unusual features of RNA-protein recognition. , 1991, Genes & development.

[15]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[16]  Dmitrij Frishman,et al.  STRIDE: a web server for secondary structure assignment from known atomic coordinates of proteins , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[17]  K. Jellinger,et al.  The role of alpha-synuclein and tau in neurodegenerative movement disorders. , 2005, Current opinion in neurology.

[18]  Christopher J. Oldfield,et al.  Intrinsically disordered proteins in human diseases: introducing the D2 concept. , 2008, Annual review of biophysics.

[19]  J. Trojanowski,et al.  Total and phosphorylated tau protein as biological markers of Alzheimer’s disease , 2010, Experimental Gerontology.

[20]  Derek Hudson,et al.  RNA recognition by an isolated α helix , 1993, Cell.

[21]  Ralf Langen,et al.  A combinatorial NMR and EPR approach for evaluating the structural ensemble of partially folded proteins. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[22]  Gert Vriend,et al.  Everyday , 2020, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature.

[23]  Duncan Poole,et al.  Routine Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 1. Generalized Born , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[24]  L. Iakoucheva,et al.  Intrinsic disorder in cell-signaling and cancer-associated proteins. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  Eric J. Sorin,et al.  Exploring the helix-coil transition via all-atom equilibrium ensemble simulations. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[26]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Importance of the CMAP correction to the CHARMM22 protein force field: dynamics of hen lysozyme. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[27]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. , 1988, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[28]  R. Berry,et al.  Modeling tau polymerization in vitro: a review and synthesis. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[29]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Improved treatment of the protein backbone in empirical force fields. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[30]  Pawel Sikorski,et al.  Molecular basis for amyloid fibril formation and stability. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  D. van der Spoel,et al.  GROMACS: A message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation , 1995 .

[32]  P. Argos,et al.  Knowledge‐based protein secondary structure assignment , 1995, Proteins.

[33]  A. Dunker,et al.  Abundance of intrinsic disorder in protein associated with cardiovascular disease. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[34]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[35]  A Keith Dunker,et al.  Sequences and topology: disorder, modularity, and post/pre translation modification. , 2013, Current opinion in structural biology.

[36]  V. Hornak,et al.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters , 2006, Proteins.

[37]  Haifeng Chen,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of amyloid fibrils: an in silico approach. , 2013, Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica.

[38]  B. Hube,et al.  Multiplicity of genes encoding secreted aspartic proteinases in Candida species , 1994, Molecular microbiology.

[39]  R. Dror,et al.  Long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations of protein structure and function. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.

[40]  G. Reddy,et al.  Sequence, expression and modeled structure of an aspartic proteinase from the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. , 1994, Molecular and biochemical parasitology.

[41]  Michael Feig,et al.  MMTSB Tool Set: enhanced sampling and multiscale modeling methods for applications in structural biology. , 2004, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[42]  D. Lazinski,et al.  Sequence-specific recognition of RNA hairpins by bacteriophage antiterminators requires a conserved arginine-rich motif , 1989, Cell.

[43]  P. Romero,et al.  Sequence complexity of disordered protein , 2001, Proteins.

[44]  Ray Luo,et al.  New Force Field on Modeling Intrinsically Disordered Proteins , 2014, Chemical biology & drug design.

[45]  M. Billeter,et al.  Calibration of the angular dependence of the amide proton-Cα proton coupling constants, 3JHNα, in a globular protein: Use of 3JHNα for identification of helical secondary structure , 1984 .

[46]  C. Bugg,et al.  Structure of ubiquitin refined at 1.8 A resolution. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[48]  S. Lindquist,et al.  α-Synuclein: membrane interactions and toxicity in Parkinson's disease. , 2010, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[49]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Protein-protein interaction networks: how can a hub protein bind so many different partners? , 2009, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[50]  A. Wlodawer,et al.  The aspartic proteinase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae folds its own inhibitor into a helix. , 2000 .

[51]  A. Bax,et al.  Protein backbone chemical shifts predicted from searching a database for torsion angle and sequence homology , 2007, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[52]  B. Dunn,et al.  The selectivity of action of the aspartic-proteinase inhibitor IA3 from yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). , 1985, The Biochemical journal.

[53]  F M Poulsen,et al.  Accurate measurements of coupling constants from two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of proteins and determination of phi-angles. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[54]  Colin Nave,et al.  Comparison of Radiation-Induced Decay and Structure Refinement from X-Ray Data Collected from Lysozyme Crystals at Low and Ambient Temperatures , 1993 .

[55]  Peter A. Kollman,et al.  AMBER, a package of computer programs for applying molecular mechanics, normal mode analysis, molecular dynamics and free energy calculations to simulate the structural and energetic properties of molecules , 1995 .