Automated Decision Procedure for Earthquake Early Warning

Early warning systems represent an effective tool for disseminating timely information about potentially catastrophic hazards to the public, emergency managers, and operators and users of transportation systems, industrial facilities, public buildings including schools and government offices, and private residences. This information gives the possibility of taking action to initiate mitigation or security measures before a catastrophic event occurs. Earthquake early warning technologies represent a promising application, especially in areas where faults are located in the proximity of an urbanized area, such as in Los Angeles and San Francisco, California. For earthquake early warning systems, automated procedures for taking action are necessary due to the short lead time available, including an automated decision procedure to decide when to activate mitigation or security measures based on the expected consequences of taking, or not taking, such actions. In this work, a decision procedure is presented that accounts for the uncertainty in the predicted ground shaking intensity at a site of a facility by deciding whether or not to take a mitigation action based on the probabilities of false and missed alarms. It uses a cost-benefit analysis of the consequences of making a wrong decision. It is shown how the method may be extended to other predictors, such as expected losses, that may be more effective parameters for rational decision making from the perspective of facility stakeholders.

[1]  I. Towhata Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering , 2008 .

[2]  G. Cua Creating the virtual seismologist: Developments in ground motion characterization and seismic early warning , 2005 .

[3]  Ta-Liang Teng,et al.  A Virtual Subnetwork Approach to Earthquake Early Warning , 2002 .

[4]  T. Heaton,et al.  A Model for a Seismic Computerized Alert Network , 1985, Science.

[5]  T. Mexia,et al.  Author ' s personal copy , 2009 .

[6]  James L. Beck,et al.  Near‐real‐time loss estimation for instrumented buildings , 2003 .

[7]  G. Roe,et al.  REAL-TIME SEISMOLOGY AND EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE MITIGATION , 2005 .

[8]  Shinji Sato,et al.  A New Method of Quickly Estimating Epicentral Distance and Magnitude from a Single Seismic Record , 2003 .

[9]  J. Andel Sequential Analysis , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[10]  Y. Fujinawa,et al.  An Automatic Processing System for Broadcasting Earthquake Alarms , 2005 .

[11]  H. Kanamori,et al.  The Potential for Earthquake Early Warning in Southern California , 2003, Science.

[12]  Osamu Kamigaichi,et al.  JMA EARTHQUAKE EARLY WARNING , 2004 .

[13]  Tzay-Chyn Shin,et al.  Quick and reliable determination of magnitude for seismic early warning , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[14]  James L. Beck,et al.  Simplified Estimation of Economic Seismic Risk for Buildings , 2004 .

[15]  G. Ibarrola,et al.  Mexico City seismic alert system , 1995 .

[16]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  REAL-TIME HAZARD ANALYSIS FOR EARTHQUAKE EARLY WARNING , 2006 .