Impacts of network expansion on generation capacity expansion

A pessimistic three-level equilibrium model for a market-based expansion of both transmission and generation is proposed. The lower (third) level models the market outcome; the intermediate (second) level models the equilibrium in generation capacity expansion by taking into account the outcomes of the market equilibrium at the third level. The upper (first) level models the expansion of the transmission network. The second and third levels are modeled as an Equilibrium Problem with Equilibrium Constraints (EPEC) parameterized in terms of the optimal decisions of the transmission planner. This three-level hierarchy is motivated by the fact that transmission planners should consider expansions in generation that may take place, as well as the clearing of the market related to generation expansion, in order to make their decisions. At the first level, the transmission planner can take different positions with different impacts in the system because a manifold of equilibria is possible with different costs for the system. Unlike previously reported hierarchical approaches, which are implicitly formulated as optimistic, we solve the pessimistic solution of the problem (the transmission planner takes a pessimistic attitude towards the outcome of the generation expansion equilibrium). Results for a test power system are presented in order to show the efficiency and interpretations of the proposed model.

[1]  Shan Jin,et al.  A Tri-Level Model of Centralized Transmission and Decentralized Generation Expansion Planning for an Electricity Market—Part I , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Stephan Dempe,et al.  Foundations of Bilevel Programming , 2002 .

[3]  J. Contreras,et al.  Finding Multiple Nash Equilibria in Pool-Based Markets: A Stochastic EPEC Approach , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  Daniel Ralph,et al.  Using EPECs to Model Bilevel Games in Restructured Electricity Markets with Locational Prices , 2007, Oper. Res..

[5]  Sonja Wogrin,et al.  Capacity Expansion Equilibria in Liberalized Electricity Markets: An EPEC Approach , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  A. Conejo,et al.  Generation Investment Equilibria With Strategic Producers—Part I: Formulation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  Sant Arora,et al.  Integrated transmission and generation planning model in a deregulated environment , 2013 .

[8]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Market-Based Coordination of Transmission and Generation Capacity Planning , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  J. Contreras,et al.  A Three-Level Static MILP Model for Generation and Transmission Expansion Planning , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  Hamidreza Zareipour,et al.  A Transmission Planning Framework Considering Future Generation Expansions in Electricity Markets , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  Sonja Wogrin,et al.  Generation Capacity Expansion Analysis: Open Loop Approximation of Closed Loop Equilibria , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  José Fortuny-Amat,et al.  A Representation and Economic Interpretation of a Two-Level Programming Problem , 1981 .

[13]  S. Granville,et al.  Nash equilibrium in strategic bidding: a binary expansion approach , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  Enzo Sauma,et al.  If you build it, he will come: Anticipative power transmission planning , 2013 .

[15]  Bethany L. Nicholson,et al.  Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints , 2021, Pyomo — Optimization Modeling in Python.

[16]  H. Saboori,et al.  Composite Generation and Transmission Expansion Planning Considering the Impact of Wind Power Penetration , 2011, 2011 Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference.

[17]  S. Oren,et al.  Proactive planning and valuation of transmission investments in restructured electricity markets , 2006 .

[18]  S. Oren,et al.  Economic Criteria for Planning Transmission Investment in Restructured Electricity Markets , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[19]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Market-Based Generation and Transmission Planning With Uncertainties , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[20]  Ruchira S. Datta Finding all Nash equilibria of a finite game using polynomial algebra , 2006 .

[21]  Yves Smeers,et al.  Stochastic Equilibrium Models for Generation Capacity Expansion , 2010 .