Biofilm image reconstruction for assessing structural parameters

The structure of biofilms can be numerically quantified from microscopy images using structural parameters. These parameters are used in biofilm image analysis to compare biofilms, to monitor temporal variation in biofilm structure, to quantify the effects of antibiotics on biofilm structure and to determine the effects of environmental conditions on biofilm structure. It is often hypothesized that biofilms with similar structural parameter values will have similar structures; however, this hypothesis has never been tested. The main goal was to test the hypothesis that the commonly used structural parameters can characterize the differences or similarities between biofilm structures. To achieve this goal (1) biofilm image reconstruction was developed as a new tool for assessing structural parameters, (2) independent reconstructions using the same starting structural parameters were tested to see how they differed from each other, (3) the effect of the original image parameter values on reconstruction success was evaluated, and (4) the effect of the number and type of the parameters on reconstruction success was evaluated. It was found that two biofilms characterized by identical commonly used structural parameter values may look different, that the number and size of clusters in the original biofilm image affect image reconstruction success and that, in general, a small set of arbitrarily selected parameters may not reveal relevant differences between biofilm structures. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011; 108:1383–1394. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Z. Lewandowski,et al.  Reproducibility of biofilm processes and the meaning of steady state in biofilm reactors. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[2]  Simone Santini,et al.  Similarity Measures , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  M. Wagner,et al.  Quantification of uncultured microorganisms by fluorescence microscopy and digital image analysis , 2007, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[4]  H Beyenal,et al.  Growing reproducible biofilms with respect to structure and viable cell counts. , 2001, Journal of microbiological methods.

[5]  Paul D. Schreuders,et al.  A method for rapid analysis of biofilm morphology and coverage on glass and polished and brushed stainless steel , 2002 .

[6]  M. Pons,et al.  Biofilm monitoring on rotating discs by image analysis , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[7]  Gary Chinga,et al.  Quantification of the 3D microstructure of SC surfaces , 2007, Journal of microscopy.

[8]  L. E. Chávez de Paz,et al.  Image Analysis Software Based on Color Segmentation for Characterization of Viability and Physiological Activity of Biofilms , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[9]  Michael Wagner,et al.  daime, a novel image analysis program for microbial ecology and biofilm research. , 2006, Environmental microbiology.

[10]  Y. Pachepsky,et al.  Biofilm morphology as related to the porous media clogging. , 2010, Water research.

[11]  Gary J. Harkin,et al.  Quantifying biofilm structure using image analysis. , 2000, Journal of microbiological methods.

[12]  C. Carvalho,et al.  Assessment of three-dimensional biofilm structure using an optical microscope. , 2007 .

[13]  J. Newbold,et al.  Effects of Current Velocity on the Nascent Architecture of Stream Microbial Biofilms , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[14]  Sangho Lee,et al.  Biofilm Structure and Extracellular Polymeric Substances in Low and High Dissolved Oxygen Membrane Bioreactors , 2006 .

[15]  Structure of RBC biofilms , 1994 .

[16]  P. Peduzzi,et al.  Structure and Composition of Aggregates in Two Large European Rivers, Based on Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy and Image and Statistical Analyses , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[17]  B. Ersbøll,et al.  Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program COMSTAT. , 2000, Microbiology.

[18]  Haluk Beyenal,et al.  Quantifying Biofilm Structure: Facts and Fiction , 2004, Biofouling.

[19]  Y. Watanabe,et al.  Significance of biofilm structure on transport of inert particulates into biofilms , 1998 .

[20]  J J Heijnen,et al.  A theoretical study on the effect of surface roughness on mass transport and transformation in biofilms. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[21]  Z. Lewandowski,et al.  Mass-transport dynamics, activity, and structure of sulfate-reducing biofilms , 2001 .

[22]  Sven Loncaric,et al.  A survey of shape analysis techniques , 1998, Pattern Recognit..

[23]  Lucas J Stal,et al.  Analysis of a marine phototrophic biofilm by confocal laser scanning microscopy using the new image quantification software PHLIP , 2006, BMC Ecology.

[24]  Paul Stoodley,et al.  Relation between the structure of an aerobic biofilm and transport phenomena , 1995 .

[25]  E Morgenroth,et al.  Textural fingerprints: A comprehensive descriptor for biofilm structure development , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[26]  Zbigniew Lewandowski,et al.  Quantifying biofilm structure , 1999 .

[27]  H. O'Connell,et al.  Enhanced high copy number plasmid maintenance and heterologous protein production in an Escherichia coli biofilm , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[28]  J. Costerton,et al.  Influence of Hydrodynamics and Cell Signaling on the Structure and Behavior of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[29]  P. Pfeifer,et al.  Microbial growth patterns described by fractal geometry , 1990, Journal of bacteriology.

[30]  F. Yildiz,et al.  Identification and Characterization of OscR, a Transcriptional Regulator Involved in Osmolarity Adaptation in Vibrio cholerae , 2009, Journal of bacteriology.

[31]  P. Bishop,et al.  Three-Dimensional Quantification of Soil Biofilms Using Image Analysis , 2007 .

[32]  J B Xavier,et al.  Automated biofilm morphology quantification from confocal laser scanning microscopy imaging. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[33]  M. Pons,et al.  Analyzing characteristic length scales in biofilm structures. , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[34]  R. Martinuzzi,et al.  Biofilm structure differentiation based on multi-resolution analysis , 2008, Biofouling.

[35]  Haluk Beyenal,et al.  Fundamentals of biofilm research , 2007 .

[36]  K. Schleifer,et al.  Structure and function of a nitrifying biofilm as determined by in situ hybridization and the use of microelectrodes , 1996, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[37]  J J Heijnen,et al.  Effect of diffusive and convective substrate transport on biofilm structure formation: a two-dimensional modeling study. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[38]  Rajashekhar,et al.  Logo Retrieval using Morphological Pattern Spectrum , 2005 .

[39]  Ashok Samal,et al.  Automatic recognition and analysis of human faces and facial expressions: a survey , 1992, Pattern Recognit..

[40]  Mark C M van Loosdrecht,et al.  A general description of detachment for multidimensional modelling of biofilms. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[41]  J J Heijnen,et al.  Mathematical modeling of biofilm structure with a hybrid differential-discrete cellular automaton approach. , 1998, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[42]  P. Stewart,et al.  A genetic basis for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm antibiotic resistance , 2003, Nature.

[43]  Z. Lewandowski,et al.  The effect of detachment on biofilm structure and activity: the oscillating pattern of biofilm accumulation. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[44]  C. Haisch,et al.  Investigation of the mesoscale structure and volumetric features of biofilms using optical coherence tomography , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.