Yaw sensory rearrangement alters pitch vestibulo-ocular reflex responses.

Ten male subjects underwent two types of adaptation paradigm designed either to enhance or to attenuate the gain of the canal-ocular reflex (COR), before undergoing otolith-ocular reflex (OOR) testing with constant velocity, earth horizontal axis and pitch rotation. The adaptation paradigm paired a 0.2 Hz sinusoidal rotation about an earth vertical axis with a 0.2 Hz optokinetic stimulus that was deliberately mismatched in peak velocity or phase and was designed to produce short-term changes in the COR. Preadaptation and postadaptation OOR tests occurred at a constant velocity of 60 degrees/sec in the dark and produced a modulation component of the slow phase velocity with a frequency of 0.16 Hz due to otolithic stimulation by the sinusoidally changing gravity vector. Of the seven subjects who showed enhancement of the COR gain, six also showed enhancement of the OOR modulation component. Of the seven subjects who showed attenuation of the COR gain, five also showed attenuation of the OOR modulation component. The probability that these two cross-axis adaptation effects would occur by chance is less than 0.02. This suggests that visual-vestibular conditioning of the yaw axis COR also induced changes in the pitch axis OOR. We thus postulate that the central nervous system pathways that process horizontal canal yaw stimuli have elements in common with those processing otolithic stimuli about the pitch axis.

[1]  L. Nashner,et al.  Dynamic posturography in the diagnosis and management of dizziness and balance disorders. , 1990, Neurologic clinics.

[2]  G. Jones,et al.  Extreme vestibulo‐ocular adaptation induced by prolonged optical reversal of vision , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  M Shelhamer,et al.  Effect of vergence on the gain of the linear vestibulo-ocular reflex. , 1995, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[4]  Conard Wall,et al.  Algorithms for the Clinical Analysis of Nystagmus Eye Movements , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  T. R. Smith,et al.  Plasticity of the human otolith-ocular reflex. , 1992, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[7]  J L Demer,et al.  Vestibulo-ocular reflex during magnified vision: adaptation to reduce visual-vestibular conflict. , 1987, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[8]  L. Young,et al.  Vestibular nucleus units in alert monkeys are also influenced by moving visual fields. , 1974, Brain research.

[9]  S. Lisberger The neural basis for motor learning in the vestibulo-ocular reflex in monkeys , 1988, Trends in Neurosciences.

[10]  C. Wall,et al.  Human vertical eye movement responses to earth horizontal pitch. , 1993, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[11]  C Wall,et al.  Visual-vestibular interaction in humans during earth-horizontal axis rotation. , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[12]  G D Paige,et al.  Eye movement responses to linear head motion in the squirrel monkey. II. Visual-vestibular interactions and kinematic considerations. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  S. Lisberger,et al.  Brain stem neurons in modified pathways for motor learning in the primate vestibulo-ocular reflex. , 1988, Science.

[14]  G. Mandl,et al.  Rapid visual vestibular interaction during visual tracking in strobe light , 1979, Brain Research.

[15]  D. Robinson,et al.  Adaptation of the human vestibuloocular reflex to magnifying lenses , 1975, Brain Research.

[16]  C. Wall,et al.  Nystagmus responses in a group of normal humans during earth-horizontal axis rotation. , 1989, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[17]  A. J. Benson Modification of the Response to Angular Accelerations by Linear Accelerations , 1974 .