Utility functions predict variance and skewness risk preferences in monkeys

Significance Utility, the key decision variable underlying economic choices, should represent risk, which is inherent to real-life decisions. We studied two prevalent forms of risk that are characterized by the spread (variance-risk) and asymmetry (skewness-risk) of rewards. We show that monkeys preferred higher variance and positively skewed gambles. Importantly, empirically estimated utility functions predicted both of these risk preferences. Thus, the abstract concept of utility seemed to explain primates’ choices under common forms of risk. Utility is the fundamental variable thought to underlie economic choices. In particular, utility functions are believed to reflect preferences toward risk, a key decision variable in many real-life situations. To assess the validity of utility representations, it is therefore important to examine risk preferences. In turn, this approach requires formal definitions of risk. A standard approach is to focus on the variance of reward distributions (variance-risk). In this study, we also examined a form of risk related to the skewness of reward distributions (skewness-risk). Thus, we tested the extent to which empirically derived utility functions predicted preferences for variance-risk and skewness-risk in macaques. The expected utilities calculated for various symmetrical and skewed gambles served to define formally the direction of stochastic dominance between gambles. In direct choices, the animals’ preferences followed both second-order (variance) and third-order (skewness) stochastic dominance. Specifically, for gambles with different variance but identical expected values (EVs), the monkeys preferred high-variance gambles at low EVs and low-variance gambles at high EVs; in gambles with different skewness but identical EVs and variances, the animals preferred positively over symmetrical and negatively skewed gambles in a strongly transitive fashion. Thus, the utility functions predicted the animals’ preferences for variance-risk and skewness-risk. Using these well-defined forms of risk, this study shows that monkeys’ choices conform to the internal reward valuations suggested by their utility functions. This result implies a representation of utility in monkeys that accounts for both variance-risk and skewness-risk preferences.

[1]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects , 2002 .

[2]  Benjamin Y Hayden,et al.  Preference patterns for skewed gambles in rhesus monkeys , 2013, Biology Letters.

[3]  Thomas Caraco,et al.  Foraging preferences: Response to reward skew , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[5]  P. Tobler,et al.  Reward skewness coding in the insula independent of probability and loss. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Elke U. Weber,et al.  Valuation for Risky and Uncertain Choices , 2013 .

[7]  M. Platt,et al.  Risk-sensitive neurons in macaque posterior cingulate cortex , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  Charlene C. Wu,et al.  The Affective Impact of Financial Skewness on Neural Activity and Choice , 2011, PloS one.

[9]  Benefits for Environmental Decisions,et al.  Choice Under Uncertainty: Problems Solved And Unsolved , 1990 .

[10]  W. Henry Chiu,et al.  Skewness Preference, Risk Taking and Expected Utility Maximisation , 2010 .

[11]  William R. Stauffer,et al.  Dopamine prediction error responses integrate subjective value from different reward dimensions , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[13]  H. Markowitz The Utility of Wealth , 1952, Journal of Political Economy.

[14]  Hiroshi Yamada,et al.  Thirst-dependent risk preferences in monkeys identify a primitive form of wealth , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  William R. Stauffer,et al.  Dopamine Reward Prediction Error Responses Reflect Marginal Utility , 2014, Current Biology.

[16]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Spatial summation by simple cells in the striate cortex of the cat , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Nicole C. Rust,et al.  Do We Know What the Early Visual System Does? , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Veit Stuphorn,et al.  Supplementary Eye Field Encodes Reward Prediction Error , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Frederick Mosteller,et al.  An Experimental Measurement of Utility , 1951, Journal of Political Economy.

[20]  W. Schultz,et al.  Coding of Reward Risk by Orbitofrontal Neurons Is Mostly Distinct from Coding of Reward Value , 2010, Neuron.

[21]  Wing-Keung Wong,et al.  A note on convex stochastic dominance , 1999 .

[22]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Neuroeconomics: decision making and the brain , 2008 .

[23]  M. Allais Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque : critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole americaine , 1953 .

[24]  P. Slovic,et al.  Preference Reversals: A Broader Perspective , 1983 .

[25]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Increasing risk: I. A definition , 1970 .

[26]  Jack A. Meyer,et al.  Second Degree Stochastic Dominance with Respect to a Function , 1977 .

[27]  D. Prelec The Probability Weighting Function , 1998 .

[28]  John D. Tressler,et al.  Increasing Downside Risk , 1980 .

[29]  W. Schultz,et al.  Economic Choices Reveal Probability Distortion in Macaque Monkeys , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[31]  C. Padoa-Schioppa Neurobiology of economic choice: a good-based model. , 2011, Annual review of neuroscience.

[32]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Striate cortex of monkey and cat: contrast response function. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  R. Luce Utility of Gains and Losses: Measurement-Theoretical and Experimental Approaches , 2000 .

[34]  C. Plott,et al.  Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon , 1979 .

[35]  G. Debreu,et al.  Cardinal utility for even-chance mixtures of pairs of sure prospects , 1959 .