Is the in-frame termination signal of the Escherichia coli release factor-2 frameshift site weakened by a particularly poor context?

The synthesis of release factor-2 (RF-2) in bacteria is regulated by a high efficiency +1 frameshifting event at an in-frame UGA stop codon. The stop codon does not specify the termination of synthesis efficiently because of several upstream stimulators for frameshifting. This study focusses on whether the particular context of the stop codon within the frameshift site of the Escherichia coli RF-2 mRNA contributes to the poor efficiency of termination. The context of UGA in this recoding site is rare at natural termination sites in E.coli genes. We have evaluated how the three nucleotides downstream from the stop codon (+4, +5 and +6 positions) in the native UGACUA sequence affect the competitiveness of the termination codon against the frameshifting event. Changing the C in the +4 position and, separately, the A in the +6 position significantly increase the termination signal strength at the frameshift site, whereas the nucleotide in the +5 position had little influence. The efficiency of particular termination signals as a function of the +4 or +6 nucleotides correlates with how often they occur at natural termination sites in E.coli; strong signals occur more frequently and weak signals are less common.

[1]  S. Korolev,et al.  Termination of translation in bacteria may be modulated via specific interaction between peptide chain release factor 2 and the last peptidyl-tRNA(Ser/Phe). , 1993, Nucleic acids research.

[2]  Mark E. Dalphin,et al.  TransTerm: a database of translational signals , 1996, Nucleic Acids Res..

[3]  J. Miller,et al.  Effects of surrounding sequence on the suppression of nonsense codons. , 1983, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  F. Studier,et al.  Consecutive low-usage leucine codons block translation only when near the 5' end of a message in Escherichia coli. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  R. Weiss,et al.  Recoding: reprogrammed genetic decoding. , 1992, Science.

[6]  D. Dunn,et al.  Reading frame switch caused by base‐pair formation between the 3′ end of 16S rRNA and the mRNA during elongation of protein synthesis in Escherichia coli. , 1988, The EMBO journal.

[7]  W. Craigen,et al.  Bacterial peptide chain release factors: conserved primary structure and possible frameshift regulation of release factor 2. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  W. Tate,et al.  Hidden infidelities of the translational stop signal. , 1996, Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology.

[9]  F. Crick,et al.  UGA: A Third Nonsense Triplet in the Genetic Code , 1967, Nature.

[10]  Chris M. Brown,et al.  The signal for the termination of protein synthesis in procaryotes. , 1990, Nucleic acids research.

[11]  L. Bossi,et al.  Context effects: translation of UAG codon by suppressor tRNA is affected by the sequence following UAG in the message. , 1983, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[13]  W. Salser,et al.  The influence of the reading context upon the suppression of nonsense codons. 3. , 1969, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[14]  E. Casale,et al.  Crystallization of the Fab from a human monoclonal antibody against gp 41 of human immunodeficiency virus type I. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  Y. Nakamura,et al.  Properties of peptide chain release factor 2 from Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2): conserved primary structure but no frameshift regulation , 1995, Journal of bacteriology.

[16]  L. Bossi,et al.  The influence of codon context on genetic code translation , 1980, Nature.

[17]  A. Böck,et al.  Nucleotide sequence and expression of the selenocysteine-containing polypeptide of formate dehydrogenase (formate-hydrogen-lyase-linked) from Escherichia coli. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  C. Kurland,et al.  Processivity errors of gene expression in Escherichia coli. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  Chris M. Brown,et al.  The identity of the base following the stop codon determines the efficiency of in vivo translational termination in Escherichia coli. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[20]  Daniel N. Wilson,et al.  Translational termination efficiency in both bacteria and mammals is regulated by the base following the stop codon. , 1995, Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire.

[21]  W P Tate,et al.  Translational termination efficiency in mammals is influenced by the base following the stop codon. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  M Yarus,et al.  Rates of aminoacyl-tRNA selection at 29 sense codons in vivo. , 1989, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  J. F. Curran,et al.  Effects of the nucleotide 3' to an amber codon on ribosomal selection rates of suppressor tRNA and release factor-1. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  Chris M. Brown,et al.  Direct recognition of mRNA stop signals by Escherichia coli polypeptide chain release factor two. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[25]  R. Weiss,et al.  Slippery runs, shifty stops, backward steps, and forward hops: -2, -1, +1, +2, +5, and +6 ribosomal frameshifting. , 1987, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[26]  Chris M. Brown,et al.  Sequence analysis suggests that tetra-nucleotides signal the termination of protein synthesis in eukaryotes. , 1990, Nucleic acids research.

[27]  F. Crick,et al.  The genetic code--yesterday, today, and tomorrow. , 1966, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[28]  A. Böck,et al.  Selenocysteine: the 21st amino acid , 1991, Molecular microbiology.

[29]  Chris M. Brown,et al.  Translational termination: "stop" for protein synthesis or "pause" for regulation of gene expression. , 1992, Biochemistry.