Phonological Feature Repetition Suppression in the Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus

Models of speech production posit a role for the motor system, predominantly the posterior inferior frontal gyrus, in encoding complex phonological representations for speech production, at the phonemic, syllable, and word levels [Roelofs, A. A dorsal-pathway account of aphasic language production: The WEAVER++/ARC model. Cortex, 59(Suppl. C), 33–48, 2014; Hickok, G. Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13, 135–145, 2012; Guenther, F. H. Cortical interactions underlying the production of speech sounds. Journal of Communication Disorders, 39, 350–365, 2006]. However, phonological theory posits subphonemic units of representation, namely phonological features [Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. The sound pattern of English, 1968; Jakobson, R., Fant, G., & Halle, M. Preliminaries to speech analysis. The distinctive features and their correlates. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1951], that specify independent articulatory parameters of speech sounds, such as place and manner of articulation. Therefore, motor brain systems may also incorporate phonological features into speech production planning units. Here, we add support for such a role with an fMRI experiment of word sequence production using a phonemic similarity manipulation. We adapted and modified the experimental paradigm of Oppenheim and Dell [Oppenheim, G. M., & Dell, G. S. Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect. Cognition, 106, 528–537, 2008; Oppenheim, G. M., & Dell, G. S. Motor movement matters: The flexible abstractness of inner speech. Memory & Cognition, 38, 1147–1160, 2010]. Participants silently articulated words cued by sequential visual presentation that varied in degree of phonological feature overlap in consonant onset position: high overlap (two shared phonological features; e.g., /r/ and /l/) or low overlap (one shared phonological feature, e.g., /r/ and /b/). We found a significant repetition suppression effect in the left posterior inferior frontal gyrus, with increased activation for phonologically dissimilar words compared with similar words. These results suggest that phonemes, particularly phonological features, are part of the planning units of the motor speech system.

[1]  R. Knight,et al.  Redefining the role of Broca’s area in speech , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  V. Gracco,et al.  Phonological processing in speech perception: What do sonority differences tell us? , 2015, Brain and Language.

[3]  Marc Sato,et al.  Age differences in the motor control of speech: An fMRI study of healthy aging , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[4]  W. Levelt,et al.  The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components , 2004, Cognition.

[5]  S. Bookheimer,et al.  Dissociating Neural Mechanisms of Temporal Sequencing and Processing Phonemes , 2003, Neuron.

[6]  Francois-Xavier Alario,et al.  Distinct representations of phonemes, syllables, and supra-syllabic sequences in the speech production network , 2009, NeuroImage.

[7]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Patterns of Poststroke Brain Damage That Predict Speech Production Errors in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia Dissociate , 2015, Stroke.

[9]  B. Horwitz,et al.  Laryngeal Motor Cortex and Control of Speech in Humans , 2011, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[10]  Kristofer E. Bouchard,et al.  Functional Organization of Human Sensorimotor Cortex for Speech Articulation , 2013, Nature.

[11]  Frank H Guenther,et al.  The DIVA model: A neural theory of speech acquisition and production , 2011, Language and cognitive processes.

[12]  D. Schacter,et al.  Priming and the Brain , 1998, Neuron.

[13]  G. Hickok,et al.  Auditory–Motor Interaction Revealed by fMRI: Speech, Music, and Working Memory in Area Spt , 2003 .

[14]  M. Iacoboni,et al.  Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  L. Shuster,et al.  An fMRI investigation of covertly and overtly produced mono- and multisyllabic words , 2005, Brain and Language.

[16]  N. Dronkers.  A new brain region for coordinating speech articulation , 1996, Nature.

[17]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[18]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  The cortical dynamics of speaking: Lexical and phonological knowledge simultaneously recruit the frontal and temporal cortex within 200 ms , 2017, NeuroImage.

[19]  R. Henson,et al.  Neural response suppression, haemodynamic repetition effects, and behavioural priming , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  R W Cox,et al.  Real‐time 3D image registration for functional MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  Gregory Hickok,et al.  Towards an integrated psycholinguistic, neurolinguistic, sensorimotor framework for speech production , 2014, Language and cognitive processes.

[22]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect , 2008, Cognition.

[23]  Feng Rong,et al.  Sensorimotor Integration in Speech Processing: Computational Basis and Neural Organization , 2011, Neuron.

[24]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Linking ordering in Broca's area to storage in left temporo-parietal regions: The case of sentence processing , 2012, NeuroImage.

[25]  M. F. Garrett,et al.  The Analysis of Sentence Production1 , 1975 .

[26]  Colin Humphries,et al.  Role of left posterior superior temporal gyrus in phonological processing for speech perception and production , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[27]  Frank H. Guenther,et al.  An fMRI investigation of syllable sequence production , 2006, NeuroImage.

[28]  Tim Curran,et al.  The dynamics of integration and separation: ERP, MEG, and neural network studies of immediate repetition effects. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Edward F Chang,et al.  Speech map in the human ventral sensory-motor cortex , 2014, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[30]  Helen C. Barron,et al.  Repetition suppression: a means to index neural representations using BOLD? , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  F. Guenther.  Cortical interactions underlying the production of speech sounds. , 2006, Journal of communication disorders.

[32]  G. Hickok.  Computational neuroanatomy of speech production , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[33]  Steven L. Small,et al.  On the context-dependent nature of the contribution of the ventral premotor cortex to speech perception , 2011, NeuroImage.

[34]  M. Halle,et al.  Preliminaries to Speech Analysis: The Distinctive Features and Their Correlates , 1961 .

[35]  Gary M. Oppenheim,et al.  Motor movement matters: The flexible abstractness of inner speech , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[36]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[37]  Gregory Hickok,et al.  Phonological repetition-suppression in bilateral superior temporal sulci , 2010, NeuroImage.

[38]  G. Dell,et al.  Stages of lexical access in language production , 1992, Cognition.

[39]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Victoria A. Fromkin,et al.  The Non-Anomalous Nature of Anomalous Utterances , 1971 .

[41]  C. Price.  The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009 , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[42]  E. Chang,et al.  Categorical Speech Representation in Human Superior Temporal Gyrus , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[44]  Cascading and feedback in interactive models of production: A reflection of forward modeling? , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[45]  Gregory Hickok,et al.  The architecture of speech production and the role of the phoneme in speech processing , 2014, Language and cognitive processes.

[46]  Jason A. Tourville,et al.  Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech , 2008, NeuroImage.

[47]  Steven L. Small,et al.  Abstract Coding of Audiovisual Speech: Beyond Sensory Representation , 2007, Neuron.

[48]  M. Torrens.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[49]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  A dorsal-pathway account of aphasic language production: The WEAVER++/ARC model , 2014, Cortex.

[50]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[51]  Keith Johnson,et al.  Phonetic Feature Encoding in Human Superior Temporal Gyrus , 2014, Science.

[52]  Sophie K. Scott,et al.  Neural Correlates of Sublexical Processing in Phonological Working Memory , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.