Challenges in Modelling Social Conflicts: Grappling with Polysemy

This discussion paper originates from the preceding annual workshop of the Special Interest Group on Social Conflict and Social Simulation (SIG-SCSS) of the ESSA. The workshop especially focused on the need to identify and examine challenges to modeling social conflicts. It turned out that the polysemous nature of social conflicts makes it very difficult to get a grasp of their complexity. In order to deal with this complexity, various dimensions have to be taken into consideration, beginning with the question of how to identify a conflict in the first place. Other dimensions include the relation of conflict and rationality and how to include non-rational factors into conflict models. This involves a conception of organized action. Finally, guiding principles for model development are being discussed. We would like to invite readers of the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation to 'sow the seeds' of this debate.

[1]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  How can extremism prevail? A study based on the relative agreement interaction model , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[2]  T. Hagmann.  Confronting the Concept of Environmentally Induced Conflict , 2005 .

[3]  Rodrigo Ventura,et al.  Responding efficiently to relevant stimuli using an emotion-based agent architecture , 2009, Neurocomputing.

[4]  EMOTIONAL `MAN': II. CORPORATE ACTORS AS EMOTION-MOTIVATED EMOTION MANAGERS , 1990 .

[5]  Eulalia Szmidt,et al.  Fuzzy thinking. The new science of fuzzy logic , 1996 .

[6]  Cobb,et al.  Imagine Coexistence: Restoring Humanity After Violent Ethnic Conflict , 2003 .

[7]  J. Gareth Polhill.  ODD Updated , 2010, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[8]  E. Halperin,et al.  Socio-Psychological Barriers to Confl ict Resolution , 2011 .

[9]  Bruce Edmonds,et al.  From KISS to KIDS - An 'Anti-simplistic' Modelling Approach , 2004, MABS.

[10]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1973 .

[11]  Wander Jager,et al.  A logic-based architecture for opinion dynamics , 2010 .

[12]  Joseph M. Whitmeyer,et al.  Social Emergence: Societies as Complex Systems , 2006 .

[13]  Jean-Daniel Kant,et al.  Using Associative Networks to Represent Adopters' Beliefs in a Multiagent Model of Innovation Diffusion , 2008, Adv. Complex Syst..

[14]  F. Amblard,et al.  Analyzing Social Conflict via Computational Social Simulation: A Review of Approaches , 2010 .

[15]  Helena Flam,et al.  EMOTIONAL `MAN': I. THE EMOTIONAL `MAN' AND THE PROBLEM OF COLLECTIVE ACTION , 1990 .

[16]  Christophe Le Page,et al.  Cormas: Common-Pool Resources and Multi-agent Systems , 1998, IEA/AIE.

[17]  Claudine Schmidt-Lainé,et al.  Environnement : modélisation et modèles pour comprendre, agir ou décider dans un contexte interdisciplinaire , 2002 .

[18]  Rainer Hegselmann,et al.  Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[19]  J. Walkup.  Fuzzy-set social science , 2003 .

[20]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. , 1990 .

[21]  Cobb,et al.  A Developmental Approach to Turning Points , 2006 .

[22]  Lynne Hamill,et al.  Agent-Based Modelling: The Next 15 Years , 2010, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[23]  P. Berger,et al.  Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace , 1950 .

[24]  M. Crozier,et al.  L' acteur et le systeme , 1978 .

[25]  G. Brady.  Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[26]  Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann,et al.  Generic personality and emotion simulation for conversational agents , 2004, Comput. Animat. Virtual Worlds.

[27]  J. Turner.  TOWARD A SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY OF MOTIVATION , 1987 .

[28]  Clinton F. Fink.  Some conceptual difficulties in the theory of social conflict , 1968 .