Economic Motives to Use a Participatory Design Approach in the Development of Public-Health Information Systems

Within public health, there is a tradition of co-operation between researchers and communities in planning and implementation of health promotion programs. As a consequence, public-health organizations are characterized by having complex multidisciplinary structure and dynamic organizational goals. In this paper, we discuss the economic impacts from the use of Participatory Design for development of public-health information systems. Creation of systems that have both utility and usability is suggested to be highlighted as the central goal. The identified pre-requisites for a positive impact are that the new system should be of high quality, appropriate to the nature of the health promotion tasks, and to how activities are coordinated and integrated both between and within the stakeholder groups involved. We argue further that a method that minimizes the information asymmetry in the development process is necessary for avoiding market failures 1. The conclusion is that participatory design will diminish transaction costs, will help to avoid sunk costs, and will contribute to rich efficient use of human and economic resources in public-health organizations.

[1]  F. Naschold Constructing the new industrial society , 1993 .

[2]  Douglas Schuler,et al.  Participatory Design: Principles and Practices , 1993 .

[3]  Madhu C. Reddy,et al.  Participatory design and an eligibility screening tool , 2000, AMIA.

[4]  T. Davenport,et al.  Building Successful Knowledge Management Projects , 1997 .

[5]  Mary Anderson Health promotion at the community level: A case for community competence. , 1993 .

[6]  D. Ulrich Intellectual Capital = Competence x Commitment , 1998 .

[7]  Katrin Ostertag Transaction cost economics , 2003 .

[8]  E Coiera Information economics and the Internet. , 2000, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[9]  G. Eliasson Micro Heterogeneity of Firms and the Stability of Industrial Growth , 1984 .

[10]  George A. Akerlof The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism , 1970 .

[11]  Mitja Rogac,et al.  Using data warehousing and OLAP in public health care , 2000, AMIA.

[12]  Toomas Timpka,et al.  Proactive health computing , 2001, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[13]  H. Simon Models of Bounded Rationality: Empirically Grounded Economic Reason , 1997 .

[14]  G. Becker,et al.  Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education, Third Edition , 1993 .

[15]  K. Dunlap Habits, their making and unmaking , 1933 .

[16]  Enid Mumford,et al.  A participative approach to computer systems design , 1979 .

[17]  N. DeClaris,et al.  Cooperative information systems for epidemiological research , 1992, [Proceedings] 1992 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[18]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of Bounded Rationality: Empirically Grounded Economic Reason , 1997 .

[19]  Manfred Kochen,et al.  On the economics of information , 1972, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[20]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Review: Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies , 1995 .

[21]  Karl E. Wiegers,et al.  Software Requirements , 1999 .

[22]  Vivian Vimarlund,et al.  Healthcare professional's demand for knowledge in informatics , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[23]  Neil Anderson,et al.  Innovation and Change in Organizations , 1995 .