A stakeholder network perspective on unexpected events and their management in international projects

Purpose – While earlier literature has focused on the management tactics of unexpected events, this paper employs an inter‐organizational network perspective to the study of unexpected events in international projects. The paper aims to illustrate how a focal project's local stakeholder relationships are associated with the emergence and management of unexpected events in the context of international projects.Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative, multiple case study of three international projects conducted in challenging institutional environments.Findings – The findings of this paper reveal the different mechanisms through which the local stakeholder relationships affect the emergence and management of unexpected events in international projects. Owing to differences in the amount and quality of local stakeholder relationships, the management, nature and number of unexpected events that are encountered differ from project to project. The findings of this paper reveal a paradox – both the existenc...

[1]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Agile Practices Reduce Distance in Global Software Development , 2006, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[2]  Anders Söderholm,et al.  Project management of unexpected events , 2008 .

[3]  Karlos Artto,et al.  What is project strategy , 2007 .

[4]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  M. Martinsuo,et al.  Integrating the change program with the parent organization , 2009 .

[6]  G. Winch Managing Project Stakeholders , 2007 .

[7]  Martin Loosemore,et al.  Social network analysis: using a quantitative tool within an interpretative context to explore the management of construction crises , 1998 .

[8]  Tuomas Ahola Efficiency in project networks : the role of inter-organizational relationships in project implementation , 2009 .

[9]  S. Manning Embedding Projects in Multiple Contexts: A Structuration Perspective , 2010 .

[10]  Roger Miller,et al.  Strategizing for anticipated risks and turbulence in large-scale engineering projects , 2001 .

[11]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition , 2003 .

[12]  M. Engwall No project is an island: linking projects to history and context , 2003 .

[13]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[14]  Eva Maaninen-Olsson,et al.  Deviations, Ambiguity and Uncertainty in a Project-Intensive Organization , 2005 .

[15]  Paul C. van Fenema,et al.  A typology of project management: emergence and evolution of new forms , 1999 .

[16]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  Supply strategy and network effects — purchasing behaviour in the construction industry , 2000 .

[17]  Bernard Cova,et al.  Six key points to merge project marketing into project management , 2005 .

[18]  Markus Hällgren,et al.  Beyond the point of no return: On the management of deviations , 2007 .

[19]  Maria Bengtsson,et al.  Bridging Distances: Organizing Boundary-spanning Technology Development Projects , 2002 .

[20]  C. Oliver Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions , 1990 .

[21]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Selectionism and Learning in Projects with Complexity and Unforeseeable Uncertainty , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Qiping Shen,et al.  An overview of previous studies in stakeholder management and its implications for the construction industry , 2009 .

[23]  K. Aaltonen,et al.  Stakeholder salience in global projects , 2008 .

[24]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutional exceptions on global projects: a process model , 2008 .

[25]  Bernard Cova,et al.  Milieu as a pertinent unit of analysis in project marketing , 1996 .

[26]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[27]  Henrikki Tikkanen,et al.  Relationships and project marketing success , 2002 .

[28]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[29]  Tim Rowley Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences , 1997 .

[30]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Capabilities, Confusion, and the Costs of Coordination On Some Problems in Recent Research On Inter-Firm Relations , 1999 .

[31]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  Managing subsidiary knowledge creation: The effect of control mechanisms on subsidiary local embeddedness , 2005 .

[32]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  On the broadening scope of the research on projects: A review and a model for analysis , 2004 .

[33]  Raymond E. Levitt,et al.  Mobilizing Knowledge for International Projects , 2008 .

[34]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[35]  J. Rodney Turner,et al.  THE HANDBOOK OF PROJECT-BASED MANAGEMENT , 2008 .

[36]  Torbjörn Stjernberg,et al.  Design and implementation in major investments -- A project network approach , 1995 .

[37]  R. Yin Yin, Robert K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1994. , 1994 .

[38]  Ieee Std,et al.  IEEE Guide Adoption of PMI Standard A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge , 2004 .

[39]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  One Size Does Not Fit All Projects: Exploring Classical Contingency Domains , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[40]  Kirsi Aaltonen,et al.  Response strategies to stakeholder pressures in global projects , 2009 .

[41]  Anna De Fina,et al.  The ethnographic interview , 2019, The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Ethnography.

[42]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. , 2001 .

[43]  M. Bresnen,et al.  Partnering in construction: a critical review of issues, problems and dilemmas , 2000 .

[44]  Östen Ohlsson,et al.  Separation or integration? A dilemma when organizing development projects , 2007 .

[45]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[46]  K. Artto,et al.  Project business as a research field , 2008 .

[47]  P. Ghauri,et al.  Project Marketing: Beyond Competitive Bidding , 2002 .

[48]  Karlos Artto,et al.  Dimensions of distance in a project network: Exploring Olkiluoto 3 nuclear power plant project , 2009 .

[49]  Oskar Grün,et al.  Taming Giant Projects: Management of Multi-Organization Enterprises , 2004 .

[50]  Roger Miller,et al.  The Strategic Management of Large Engineering Projects: Shaping Institutions, Risks, and Governance , 2001 .

[51]  C. Oliver STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .