Generating Novelty Through Interdependent Routines: A Process Model of Routine Work

We investigate how multiple actors accomplish interdependent routine performances directed at novel intended outcomes and how this affects routine dynamics over time. We report findings from a longitudinal ethnographic study in an automotive company where actors developed a new business model around information-based services. By analyzing episodes involving interdependent routines, we develop a process model of routine work and dynamics across routines. We identify three types of routine work (flexing, stretching, and inventing) that generate increasingly novel actions and outcomes. Flexed, stretched, and invented performances create emerging consequences for further actions across routines and surface differences between actors that could lead to breakdowns of routine work. Actors respond to such consequences through iterative and cascading episodes of routine work. We discuss how our findings provide new insights in efforts to create variable routine performances and the consequences of interdependence for routine dynamics.

[1]  T. Amburgey,et al.  Organizational Inertia and Momentum: A Dynamic Model Of Strategic Change , 1991 .

[2]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  The foundation is solid, if you know where to look: comment on Felin and Foss , 2010, Journal of Institutional Economics.

[3]  M. Feldman,et al.  Organizational Routines as Sources of Connections and Understandings , 2002 .

[4]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[5]  M. Feldman A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines , 2003 .

[6]  Karen Locke Grounded Theory in Management Research , 2000 .

[7]  Anna Essén,et al.  Variability as a source of stability: Studying routines in the elderly home care setting , 2008 .

[8]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[9]  S. Barley,et al.  Bringing Work Back In , 2001 .

[10]  S. Fagerhaugh,et al.  Participant Observation , 1979 .

[11]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Dynamics of Organizational Routines: A Generative Model , 2012 .

[12]  Jennifer A. Howard-Grenville The Persistence of Flexible Organizational Routines: The Role of Agency and Organizational Context , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[13]  Mark J. Zbaracki,et al.  When Truces Collapse: A Longitudinal Study of Price-Adjustment Routines , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[14]  Jeremy Birnholtz,et al.  Organizational Character: On the Regeneration of , 2007 .

[15]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Organizational Routines as a Unit of Analysis , 2005 .

[16]  H. Tsoukas,et al.  Understanding the (Re)Creation of Routines from Within: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective , 2013 .

[17]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Conceptualizing and Measuring Variety in the Execution of Organizational Work Processes , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Into the black box: the knowledge transformation cycle , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[19]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[20]  R. Emerson,et al.  Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes , 1995 .

[21]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Institutional Entrepreneurship in Mature Fields: The Big Five Accounting Firms , 2006 .

[22]  Alessandro Narduzzo,et al.  Talking about routines in the field: the emergence of organizational capabilities in a new cellular phone network company , 1997 .

[23]  Carlo Salvato,et al.  Capabilities Unveiled: The Role of Ordinary Activities in the Evolution of Product Development Processes , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[24]  D. Weir Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography , 2013 .

[25]  Michael E. Holmes,et al.  Organizational Change and Innovation Processes: Theory and Methods for Research , 2000 .

[26]  高橋 進 サイアート, マーチの「A Behavioral Theory of the Firm」 , 1995 .

[27]  Michael J. Fern,et al.  Examining the Stability and Variability of Routine Performances: The Effects of Experience and Context Change , 2012 .

[28]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[29]  S. Winter Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[30]  Jörgen Sandberg GRASPING THE LOGIC OF PRACTICE : THEORIZING THROUGH PRACTICAL RATIONALITY , 2011 .

[31]  M. Feldman,et al.  Routines as a Source of Change in Organizational Schemata: The Role of Trial-and-Error Learning , 2011 .

[32]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[33]  Mustafa Emirbayer What Is Agency ? ' , 2008 .

[34]  Benyamin Lichtenstein,et al.  Relationality in Organizational Research: Exploring The Space Between , 2000 .

[35]  Mark J. Zbaracki,et al.  Pricing process as a capability: a resource-based perspective , 2003 .

[36]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Toward a Theory of Coordinating: Creating Coordinating Mechanisms in Practice , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[37]  Chris J. Sablynski,et al.  Qualitative Research in Organizational and Vocational Psychology, 1979–1999 , 1999 .

[38]  Mustafa Emirbayer Manifesto for a Relational Sociology1 , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.

[39]  Scott F. Turner,et al.  A Balancing Act: How Organizations Pursue Consistency in Routine Functioning in the Face of Ongoing Change , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[40]  E. Johnsen Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[41]  Michael Agar,et al.  The professional stranger , 1980 .

[42]  Tammy L. Madsen,et al.  Microfoundations of Routines and Capabilities: Individuals, Processes, and Structure , 2012 .

[43]  Luciana D'Adderio The Performativity of Routines: Theorising the Influence of Artefacts and Distributed Agencies on Routines Dynamics , 2008 .

[44]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[45]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Organizational Routines Are Stored as Procedural Memory: Evidence from a Laboratory Study , 1994 .

[46]  Alexandra Michel,et al.  The Mutual Constitution of Persons and Organizations: An Ontological Perspective on Organizational Change , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[47]  B. Pentland,et al.  Organizational Routines as Grammars of Action , 1994 .

[48]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  10 Coordination in Organizations: An Integrative Perspective , 2009 .

[49]  Adler,et al.  Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system , 1999 .

[50]  Mustafa Emirbayer,et al.  What Is Agency?1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[51]  Luciana D'Adderio,et al.  The Replication Dilemma Unravelled: How Organizations Enact Multiple Goals in Routines Transfer , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[52]  Carsten S. Østerlund,et al.  Relations in Practice: Sorting Through Practice Theories on Knowledge Sharing in Complex Organizations , 2005, Inf. Soc..

[54]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[55]  A. Pettigrew Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[56]  M. Feldman Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change , 2000 .

[57]  G. Pisano,et al.  Disrupted Routines: Team Learning and New Technology Implementation in Hospitals , 2001 .

[58]  A. Langley Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[59]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[60]  Anita L. Tucker,et al.  Why Hospitals Don't Learn from Failures: Organizational and Psychological Dynamics That Inhibit System Change , 2003 .

[61]  Michael X Cohen Reading Dewey: Reflections on the Study of Routine , 2007 .

[62]  E. O. Stene An Approach to a Science of Administration , 1940, American Political Science Review.

[63]  Thomas B. Lawrence,et al.  The turn to work in organization and management theory: Some implications for strategic organization , 2012 .

[64]  Jennifer A. Howard-Grenville,et al.  Routines Revisited: Exploring the Capabilities and Practice Perspectives , 2011 .

[65]  Beth A. Bechky Gaffers, Gofers, and Grips: Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Organizations , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[66]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[67]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  The (N)Ever-Changing World: Stability and Change in Organizational Routines , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[68]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research , 2013 .

[69]  D. Whetten What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution , 1989 .

[70]  Thomas S. Ulen An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. By Richard R. Nelson and Sidney G. Winter. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982. xi + 437 pp. $25.00.) , 1983, Business History Review.

[71]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .