Using Machine Learning to Improve the Prediction of Functional Outcome in Ischemic Stroke Patients

Ischemic stroke is a leading cause of disability and death worldwide among adults. The individual prognosis after stroke is extremely dependent on treatment decisions physicians take during the acute phase. In the last five years, several scores such as the ASTRAL, DRAGON, and THRIVE have been proposed as tools to help physicians predict the patient functional outcome after a stroke. These scores are rule-based classifiers that use features available when the patient is admitted to the emergency room. In this paper, we apply machine learning techniques to the problem of predicting the functional outcome of ischemic stroke patients, three months after admission. We show that a pure machine learning approach achieves only a marginally superior Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$0.808\pm 0.085$</tex-math><alternatives><inline-graphic xlink:href="monteiro-ieq1-2811471.gif"/></alternatives></inline-formula>) than that of the best score (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$0.771\pm 0.056$</tex-math><alternatives><inline-graphic xlink:href="monteiro-ieq2-2811471.gif"/></alternatives></inline-formula>) when using the features available at admission. However, we observed that by progressively adding features available at further points in time, we can significantly increase the AUC to a value above 0.90. We conclude that the results obtained validate the use of the scores at the time of admission, but also point to the importance of using more features, which require more advanced methods, when possible.

[1]  D. Bamber The area above the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristic graph , 1975 .

[2]  Andrew P. Bradley,et al.  The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms , 1997, Pattern Recognit..

[3]  R. Harvey Predictors of Functional Outcome Following Stroke. , 2015, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[4]  J. Marler,et al.  Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. , 1989, Stroke.

[5]  C. Mathers,et al.  Stroke incidence and prevalence in Europe: a review of available data , 2006, European journal of neurology.

[6]  Charith N. Cooray,et al.  External Validation of the ASTRAL and DRAGON Scores for Prediction of Functional Outcome in Stroke , 2016, Stroke.

[7]  Werner Hacke,et al.  Thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST): an observational study , 2007, The Lancet.

[8]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[9]  Tianqi Chen,et al.  XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System , 2016, KDD.

[10]  J. Grotta,et al.  THRIVE Score Predicts Ischemic Stroke Outcomes and Thrombolytic Hemorrhage Risk in VISTA , 2022 .

[11]  G. Saposnik An integer-based score to predict functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke: The ASTRAL score , 2012, Neurology.

[12]  S. Cullen,et al.  Predicting Long-Term Outcome after Endovascular Stroke Treatment: The Totaled Health Risks in Vascular Events Score , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[13]  Yilong Wang,et al.  Totaled Health Risks in Vascular Events Score Predicts Clinical Outcome and Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage in Chinese Patients After Thrombolysis , 2015, Stroke.

[14]  J. Rankin Cerebral Vascular Accidents in Patients over the Age of 60: II. Prognosis , 1957, Scottish medical journal.

[15]  M. Kaste,et al.  Predicting outcome of IV thrombolysis–treated ischemic stroke patients , 2012, Neurology.