Environmental impacts of a circular recovery process for hard disk drive rare earth magnets

Abstract Hard disk drives (HDDs) are prioritized by many stakeholders for implementation of circular economy initiatives due to their value and critical material content. Rare earth (RE) magnets are of particular interest for recovery and reuse (R&R), but the business model has not been demonstrated for feasibility at a large scale. This study assessed a pilot-scale R&R process for RE magnet assemblies and compared the environmental impacts with business as usual (BAU) (i.e. shredding whole HDDs at end-of-life), using life cycle assessment (LCA). The process was implemented by two major stakeholders in the HDD value chain – a large HDD user (i.e., data center) and a HDD manufacturer. Primary data on materials, transportation, and electricity inputs were collected from dismantling 6100 end-of-life HDDs in a data center, transporting the retrieved RE magnet assemblies to a HDD manufacturer, and placing them in new HDDs for reuse. LCA results indicated an 86% reduction in global warming potential: 3.70 kg CO2-eq per set of magnet assemblies from one HDD compared to the BAU system. The environmental benefit was predominantly due to foregoing the RE magnet production, which is the most energy and chemically intensive process within the magnet assembly. This pilot also highlighted the benefits of a collocated R&R process with data centers to address (1) data security concerns, (2) transboundary shipments of e-waste (whole HDDs vs. components), and (3) the need for a qualified manufacturing process for disassembly, which is required to reuse components in new HDDs.

[1]  Fabrice Mathieux,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of repurposed electric vehicle batteries: an adapted method based on modelling energy flows , 2018, Journal of Energy Storage.

[2]  Carol A. Handwerker,et al.  The use of decision support tools to accelerate the development of circular economic business models for hard disk drives and rare-earth magnets , 2020, MRS Energy & Sustainability.

[3]  Alexander H. King,et al.  When agendas align: Critical materials and green electronics , 2016, 2016 Electronics Goes Green 2016+ (EGG).

[4]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  LCA benchmarking study on textiles made of cotton, polyester, nylon, acryl, or elastane , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[5]  Ruby Thuy Nguyen,et al.  Economic Assessment for Recycling Critical Metals From Hard Disk Drives Using a Comprehensive Recovery Process , 2017 .

[6]  M. Hiete,et al.  Allocation of Environmental Impacts in Circular and Cascade Use of Resources—Incentive-Driven Allocation as a Prerequisite for Cascade Persistence , 2020, Sustainability.

[7]  C. Handwerker,et al.  Life cycle assessment of emerging technologies on value recovery from hard disk drives , 2020, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[8]  R. Kleijn,et al.  Life cycle inventory of the production of rare earths and the subsequent production of NdFeB rare earth permanent magnets. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Stephen A. Ross,et al.  Uncertainty Quantification in Life Cycle Assessments: Exploring Distribution Choice and Greater Data Granularity to Characterize Product Use , 2019 .

[10]  Fu Zhao,et al.  An initial life cycle assessment of rare earth oxides production from ion-adsorption clays , 2016 .

[11]  C. Ekberg,et al.  Recovery of critical materials from mine tailings: A comparative study of the solvent extraction of rare earths using acidic, solvating and mixed extractant systems , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[12]  J. R. Perez-Gallardo,et al.  A Multi-objective Framework for Assessment of Recycling Strategies for Photovoltaic Modules based on Life Cycle Assessment , 2018 .

[13]  Nenad G. Nenadic,et al.  Environmental trade-offs across cascading lithium-ion battery life cycles , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[14]  Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable and Disposable Cleanroom Coveralls , 2018, PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

[15]  P. Hodgson,et al.  Evaluating the Environmental Dimension of Material Efficiency Strategies Relating to the Circular Economy , 2018 .

[16]  P. Lens,et al.  Electronic waste as a secondary source of critical metals: Management and recovery technologies , 2017, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[17]  W. Dewulf,et al.  Review and new life cycle assessment for rare earth production from bastnäsite, ion adsorption clays and lateritic monazite , 2020 .

[18]  Rita Schulze,et al.  Estimates of global REE recycling potentials from NdFeB magnet material , 2016 .

[19]  Dylan T Buechler,et al.  Comprehensive elemental analysis of consumer electronic devices: Rare earth, precious, and critical elements. , 2019, Waste management.

[20]  Fu Zhao,et al.  Behind the Scenes of Clean Energy: The Environmental Footprint of Rare Earth Products , 2018 .

[21]  Dale Sartor,et al.  Self-benchmarking Guide for Cleanrooms: Metrics, Benchmarks, Actions , 2009 .

[22]  J. Sutherland,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Neodymium-Iron-Boron Magnet-to-Magnet Recycling for Electric Vehicle Motors. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  Belarmino Adenso-Díaz,et al.  An analysis of some environmental consequences of European electrical and electronic waste regulation , 2008 .

[24]  Maria Grazia Gnoni,et al.  Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: A critical analysis , 2017 .