Social Interaction in Games

Psychophysiological methodology has been successfully applied to investigate media responses, including the experience of playing digital games. The approach has many benefits for a player experience assessment—it can provide detailed, unbiased, and time-accurate data without interrupting the gameplay. However, gaming can be a highly social activity. This article extends the methodological focus from single player to include multiple simultaneous players. A physiological metric for investigating social experience within a shared gaming context is introduced: Physiological linkage is measured by gathering simultaneous psychophysiological measurements from several players. The authors review how physiological linkage may be associated with social presence among participants in various gaming situations or social contexts. These metrics provide such information about the interaction among participants that is not currently available by any other method. The authors discuss various measures used to calculate linkage, the related social processes, and how to use physiological linkage in game experience research.

[1]  J. Russell.  A circumplex model of affect. , 1980 .

[2]  J. Gottman,et al.  The Analysis of Dominance and Bidirectionality in Social Development. , 1981 .

[3]  P. Allison,et al.  Analyzing Sequential Categorical Data on Dyadic Interaction: A Comment on Gottman , 1982 .

[4]  J. Gottman,et al.  Marital interaction: physiological linkage and affective exchange. , 1983, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[6]  W. R. Dillon,et al.  Analyzing Sequential Categorical Data on Dyadic Interaction , 1989 .

[7]  R. Levenson,et al.  Empathy: a physiological substrate. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  M. Bradley,et al.  Looking at pictures: affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[9]  P. Lang.  The emotion probe. Studies of motivation and attention. , 1995, The American psychologist.

[10]  E. Hatfield,et al.  Emotional Contagion , 1995 .

[11]  F. Varela,et al.  Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[12]  D. Watson,et al.  On the Dimensional and Hierarchical Structure of Affect , 1999 .

[13]  M. C. Gil,et al.  Social-physiological compliance as a determinant of team performance. , 2001, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[14]  J. Jacko,et al.  The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications , 2002 .

[15]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Toward a More Robust Theory and Measure of Social Presence: Review and Suggested Criteria , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[16]  R. Adolphs.  Cognitive neuroscience: Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[17]  Katie Salen,et al.  Rules of play: game design fundamentals , 2003 .

[18]  R. Malach,et al.  Intersubject Synchronization of Cortical Activity During Natural Vision , 2004, Science.

[19]  N. Ravaja.  Contributions of Psychophysiology to Media Research: Review and Recommendations , 2004 .

[20]  Jeff T. Larsen,et al.  The Agony of Victory and Thrill of Defeat , 2004, Psychological science.

[21]  J. Russell,et al.  The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology , 2005, Development and Psychopathology.

[22]  C. Stam,et al.  Nonlinear dynamical analysis of EEG and MEG: Review of an emerging field , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  Arthur A. Raney,et al.  Adolescents and the Appeal of Video Games. , 2006 .

[24]  John L. Sherry,et al.  Narrative and interactivity in computer games , 2006 .

[25]  Richard L. Hazlett,et al.  Measuring emotional valence during interactive experiences: boys at video game play , 2006, CHI.

[26]  Marko Turpeinen,et al.  Spatial Presence and Emotions during Video Game Playing: Does It Matter with Whom You Play? , 2006, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[27]  Ikuo Daibo,et al.  Interactional Synchrony in Conversations about Emotional Episodes: A Measurement by “the Between-Participants Pseudosynchrony Experimental Paradigm” , 2006 .

[28]  D. Kort,et al.  Digital Games as Social Presence Technology: Development of the Social Presence in Gaming Questionnaire (SPGQ) , 2007 .

[29]  Yvonne de Kort,et al.  People, Places, and Play: A research framework for digital game experience in a socio-spatial context , 2007, DiGRA Conference.

[30]  M. Iacoboni,et al.  The self and social cognition: the role of cortical midline structures and mirror neurons , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The skeletomotor system: Surface electromyography. , 2007 .

[32]  Regan L. Mandryk,et al.  A fuzzy physiological approach for continuously modeling emotion during interaction with play technologies , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[33]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Handbook Of Psychophysiology , 2019 .

[34]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Top-Down Control of Human Visual Cortex by Frontal and Parietal Cortex in Anticipatory Visual Spatial Attention , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Katherine Isbister,et al.  Game Usability: Advancing the Player Experience , 2008 .

[36]  Yvonne de Kort,et al.  Shared Fun Is Doubled Fun: Player Enjoyment as a Function of Social Setting , 2008, Fun and Games.

[37]  Shu-Chen Li,et al.  Brains swinging in concert: cortical phase synchronization while playing guitar , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[38]  M. Salminen,et al.  Increased oscillatory theta activation evoked by violent digital game events , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[39]  R. Henning,et al.  Social psychophysiological compliance in a four-person research team. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[40]  Kari Kallinen,et al.  Frontal EEG Asymmetry in the Study of Player Experiences During Competitive and Cooperative Dual Play , 2009 .

[41]  Jong-Eun Roselyn Lee,et al.  When Playing Together Feels Different: Effects of Task Types and Social Contexts on Physiological Arousal in Multiplayer Online Gaming Contexts , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[42]  Adam W. Hoover,et al.  Physiological compliance and team performance. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[43]  N. Ravaja.  The Psychophysiology of Digital Gaming: The Effect of a Non Co-Located Opponent , 2009 .

[44]  J. Matias,et al.  Review on psychophysiological methods in game research , 2010 .

[45]  Byron Reeves,et al.  Computer agents versus avatars: Responses to interactive game characters controlled by a computer or other player , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[46]  Georgios N. Yannakakis,et al.  Correlation between heart rate, electrodermal activity and player experience in first-person shooter games , 2010, Sandbox '10.

[47]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  Affective Ludology, Flow and Immersion in a First- Person Shooter: Measurement of Player Experience , 2009, ArXiv.

[48]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  Wiimote vs. controller: electroencephalographic measurement of affective gameplay interaction , 2010, Future Play.

[49]  J. Bryant,et al.  Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences. , 2012 .

[50]  Guillaume Chanel,et al.  Physiological compliance for social gaming analysis: Cooperative versus competitive play , 2012, Interact. Comput..

[51]  M. Dawson,et al.  The electrodermal system , 2007 .