Independence of perceptual and sensorimotor predictions in the size–weight illusion

The smaller of two equally weighted objects is judged to be heavier when lifted. Here we disproved a leading hypothesis that this size–weight illusion is caused by a mismatch between predicted and actual sensory feedback. We showed that when subjects repeatedly lifted equally heavy large and small objects in alternation, they learned to scale their fingertip forces precisely for the true object weights and thus exhibited accurate sensorimotor prediction. The size–weight illusion nevertheless persisted, suggesting that the illusion can be caused by high-level cognitive and perceptual factors and indicating that the sensorimotor system can operate independently of the cognitive/perceptual system.

[1]  A. Charpentier Experimental study of some aspects of weight perception , 1891 .

[2]  Théodore Flournoy,et al.  Illusions de poids , 1894 .

[3]  H. K. Wolfe,et al.  Some effects of size on judgments of weight , 2022 .

[4]  R. Sperry Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. , 1950, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[5]  E. Holst Relations between the central Nervous System and the peripheral organs , 1954 .

[6]  Contribution to the study of the size-weight illusion by the method of p. koseleff , 1955 .

[7]  H. Ross When is a Weight not Illusory? , 1969, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  R. Granit Constant errors in the execution and appreciation of movement. , 1972, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  C. M. Davis,et al.  Lifting movements in the size-weight illusion , 1976 .

[10]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  Absolute scaling of sensory magnitudes: A validation , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  M. Lings,et al.  Articles , 1967, Soil Science Society of America Journal.

[12]  L. Jakobson,et al.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them , 1991, Nature.

[13]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Forward Models: Supervised Learning with a Distal Teacher , 1992, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  S. Lederman,et al.  The role of haptic versus visual volume cues in the size-weight illusion , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension , 1994, Current Biology.

[17]  R S Johansson,et al.  Grasp stability during manipulative actions. , 1994, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[18]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[19]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration. , 1995, Science.

[20]  M T Turvey,et al.  Weight perception and the haptic size-weight illusion are functions of the inertia tensor. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  M. Turvey,et al.  Weight perception and the haptic size-weight illusion are functions of the inertia tensor. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control , 1996, Neural Networks.

[23]  R. Johansson,et al.  Tangential torque effects on the control of grip forces when holding objects with a precision grip. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Eric L. Amazeen,et al.  The Effects of volume on Perceived Heaviness by Dynamic Touch: With and Without Vision , 1997 .

[25]  P Jenmalm,et al.  Visual and Somatosensory Information about Object Shape Control Manipulative Fingertip Forces , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  J R Flanagan,et al.  The Role of Internal Models in Motion Planning and Control: Evidence from Grip Force Adjustments during Movements of Hand-Held Loads , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  A. Wing,et al.  Anticipating load torques produced by voluntary movements. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  R. Johansson,et al.  Control of grasp stability when humans lift objects with different surface curvatures. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  S. Lederman,et al.  The Golf-Ball Illusion: Evidence for Top-down Processing in Weight Perception , 1998, Perception.

[31]  R. Johansson,et al.  Control of Grip Force When Tilting Objects: Effect of Curvature of Grasped Surfaces and Applied Tangential Torque , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[33]  R. Johansson,et al.  Control of grasp stability during pronation and supination movements , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  R S Johansson,et al.  Control of fingertip forces in multidigit manipulation. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  H E Ross,et al.  Charpentier (1891) on the size—weight illusion , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  Tamar Flash,et al.  Computational approaches to motor control , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.