Social Networks and Collective Action

Despite growing attention to the role of social context in determining political participation, the effect of the structure of social networks remains little examined. This article introduces a model of interdependent decision making within social networks, in which individuals have heterogeneous motivations to participate, and networks are defined via a qualitative typology mirroring common empirical contexts. The analysis finds that some metrics for networks' influence—size, the prevalence of weak ties, the presence of elites—have a more complex interaction with network structure and individual motivations than has been previously acknowledged. For example, in some contexts additional network ties decrease participation. This presents the potential for selection bias in empirical studies. The model offers a fuller characterization of the role of network structure and predicts expected levels of participation across network types and distributions of motivations as a function of network size, weak and strong ties, and elite influence.

[1]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action , 1965 .

[2]  Sidney C. Sufrin,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1966 .

[3]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  Earl R. Rolph Public Goods and Public Welfare , 1975, American Political Science Review.

[5]  C. Tilly From mobilization to revolution , 1978 .

[6]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[7]  Mark S. Granovetter Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  T. Schelling Micromotives and Macrobehavior , 1978 .

[9]  Sheldon Ekland-Olson,et al.  Social Networks and Social Movements: A Microstructural Approach to Differential Recruitment , 1980 .

[10]  Mark S. Granovetter,et al.  Threshold models of diffusion and collective behavior , 1983 .

[11]  Roland Soong,et al.  Threshold models of interpersonal effects in consumer demand , 1986 .

[12]  Doug McAdam Recruitment to High-Risk Activism: The Case of Freedom Summer , 1986, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  G. Marwell,et al.  Social Networks and Collective Action: A Theory of the Critical Mass. III , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  G. Marwell,et al.  THE PARADOX OF GROUP SIZE IN COLLECTIVE ACTION: A THEORY OF THE CRITICAL MASS. II. * , 1988 .

[15]  Jan E. Leighley Social Interaction and Contextual Influences On Political Participation , 1990 .

[16]  Roger V. Gould MULTIPLE NETWORKS AND MOBILIZATION IN THE PARIS COMMUNE, 1871* , 1991 .

[17]  M. Macy Chains of Cooperation: Threshold Effects in Collective Action , 1991 .

[18]  Dennis Chong Collective action and the civil rights movement , 1991 .

[19]  M. Macy Learning to Cooperate: Stochastic and Tacit Collusion in Social Exchange , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  T. Kuran,et al.  Now out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989 , 1991, World Politics.

[21]  S. Borgatti,et al.  Notions of position in social network analysis , 1992 .

[22]  Christopher Kenny,et al.  Political Participation and Effects from the Social Environment , 1992 .

[23]  P. Oliver Formal Models of Collective Action , 1993 .

[24]  Doug McAdam,et al.  Specifying the Relationship Between Social Ties and Activism , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[25]  K. Opp,et al.  Dissident Groups, Personal Networks, and Spontaneous Cooperation: The East German Revolution of 1989 , 1993 .

[26]  G. Marwell,et al.  The critical mass in collective action , 1993 .

[27]  Roger V. Gould Collective Action and Network Structure , 1993 .

[28]  S. Lohmann The Dynamics of Informational Cascades: The Monday Demonstrations in Leipzig, East Germany, 1989–91 , 1994, World Politics.

[29]  P. Hedström Contagious Collectivities: On the Spatial Diffusion of Swedish Trade Unions, 1890-1940 , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[30]  Timur Kuran Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification , 1995 .

[31]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics , 1996 .

[32]  R. Huckfeldt,et al.  Citizens, Politics and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign , 1995 .

[33]  T. Ohlemacher Bridging People and Protest: Social Relays of Protest Groups Against Low-Flying Military Jets in West Germany , 1996 .

[34]  D. Heckathorn The dynamics and dilemmas of collective action , 1996 .

[35]  Hyojoung Kim,et al.  The structure and dynamics of movement participation , 1997 .

[36]  Rickard Sandell,et al.  GROUP SIZE AND THE LOGIC OF COLLECTIVE ACTION: , 1998 .

[37]  Robert Huckfeldt,et al.  Social Capital, Social Networks, and Political Participation , 1998 .

[38]  Chien-Chung Yin,et al.  Equilibria of collective action in different distributions of protest thresholds , 1998 .

[39]  D. Strang,et al.  DIFFUSION IN ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS: From Hybrid Corn to Poison Pills , 1998 .

[40]  P. Hedström,et al.  Social mechanisms : an analytical approach to social theory , 1999 .

[41]  Robert Huckfeldt,et al.  The Social Communication of Political Expertise , 2001 .

[42]  Roger Petersen,et al.  Resistance and Rebellion: Lessons from Eastern Europe , 2001 .

[43]  S. Strogatz Exploring complex networks , 2001, Nature.

[44]  Kristian Skrede Gleditsch,et al.  All International Politics is Local: The Diffusion of Conflict, Integration, and Democratization , 2002 .

[45]  Jie Wu,et al.  Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness , 2003 .

[46]  Diana C. Mutz The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation , 2002 .

[47]  S. McClurg,et al.  Social Networks and Political Participation: The Role of Social Interaction in Explaining Political Participation , 2003 .

[48]  S. McClurg Indirect Mobilization , 2004 .

[49]  William D. Berry,et al.  Using Geographic Information Systems to Study Interstate Competition , 2005, American Political Science Review.

[50]  Marc Sageman,et al.  Understanding terror networks. , 2004, International journal of emergency mental health.

[51]  Daniel B. Neill,et al.  Cascade Effects in Heterogeneous Populations , 2005 .

[52]  John T. Scholz,et al.  Cooptation or Transformation? Local Policy Networks and Federal Regulatory Enforcement , 2006 .

[53]  M. Kearns,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Coloring Problem on Human Subject Networks , 2006, Science.

[54]  Scott D. McClurg,et al.  The Electoral Relevance of Political Talk: Examining Disagreement and Expertise Effects in Social Networks on Political Participation , 2006 .

[55]  J. Fowler Connecting the Congress: A Study of Cosponsorship Networks , 2006, Political Analysis.

[56]  H. Ohtsuki,et al.  A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks , 2006, Nature.

[57]  Casey A. Klofstad How Discussions about Politics and Current Events Increase Civic Participation , 2007 .

[58]  James H. Fowler,et al.  Turnout in a Small World , 2007 .

[59]  M. Macy,et al.  Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[60]  Christopher W. Larimer,et al.  Social Pressure and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment , 2008, American Political Science Review.

[61]  David W. Nickerson Is Voting Contagious? Evidence from Two Field Experiments , 2008, American Political Science Review.