The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history.

This article argues that (a) ego, or self, is an organization of knowledge, (b) ego is characterized by cognitive biases strikingly analogous to totalitarian information-control strategies, and (c) these totalitarian-ego biases junction to preserve organization in cognitive structures. Ego's cognitive biases are egocentricity (self as the focus of knowledge), "beneffectance" (perception of responsibility for desired, but not undesired, outcomes), and cognitive conservatism (resistance to cognitive change). In addition to being pervasively evident in recent studies of normal human cognition, these three biases are found in actively functioning, higher level organizations of knowledge, perhaps best exemplified by theoretical paradigms in science. The thesis that egocentricity, beneffectance, and conservatism act to preserve knowledge organizations leads to the proposal of an intrapsychic analog of genetic evolution, which in turn provides an alternative to prevalent motivational and informational interpretations of cognitive biases. The ego rejects the unbearable idea together with its associated affect and behaves as if the idea had never occurred to the person at all. (Freud, 1894/1959, p. 72) Alike with the individual and the group, the past is being continually re-made, reconstructed in the interests of the present. (Bartlett, 1932, p. 309) As historians of our own lives we seem to be, on the one hand, very inattentive and, on the other, revisionists who will justify the present by changing the past. (Wixon & Laird, 1976, p. 384) "Who controls the past," ran the Party slogan, "controls the future: who controls the present controls the past." (Orwell, 1949, p. 32) What follows is a portrait of self (or ego—the terms are used interchangeably) constructed by interweaving strands drawn from several areas of recent research. The most striking features of the portrait are three cognitive biases, which correspond disturbingly to thought control and propaganda devices that are considered to be defining characteristics of a totalitarian political system. The epithet for ego, Vol. 35, No. 7, 603-618 totalitarian, was chosen only with substantial reservation because of this label's pejorative connotations. Interestingly, characteristics that seem undesirable in a political system can nonetheless serve adaptively in a personal organization of knowledge. The conception of ego as an organization of knowledge synthesizes influences from three sources —empirical, literary, and theoretical. First, recent empirical demonstrations of self-relevant cognitive biases suggest that the biases play a role in some fundamental aspect of personality. Second, George Orwell's 1984 suggests the analogy between ego's biases and totalitarian information control. Last, the theories of Loevinger (197,6) and Epstein (1973) suggest the additional analogy between ego's organization and theoretical organizations of scientific knowledge. The first part of this article surveys evidence indicating that ego's cognitive biases are pervasive in and characteristic of normal personalities. The second part sets forth arguments for interpreting the biases as manifestations of an effectively functioning organization of knowledge. The last section develops an explanation for the totalitarian-ego biases by analyzing their role in maintaining cognitive organization and in supporting effective behavior. /. Three Cognitive Biases: Fabrication and Revision of Personal History Ego, as an organization of knowledge (a conclusion to ,be developed later), serves the functions of observing (perceiving) and recording (remembering) personal experience; it can be characterized, therefore, as a personal historian. Many findings Acknowledgments are given at the end of the article. Requests for reprints should be sent to Anthony G. Greenwald, Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, 404C West 17th Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43210. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST • JULY 1980 • 603 Copyright 1980 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 0003-066X/80/3507-0603$00.75 from recent research in personality, cognitive, and social psychology demonstrate that ego fabricates and revises history, thereby engaging in practices not ordinarily admired in historians. These lapsesin personal scholarship, or cognitive biases, are discussed below in three categories: egocentricity (self perceived as more central to events than it is)', "beneffectance" (self perceived as selectively responsible for desired, but not undesired, outcomes), and conservatism (resistance to cognitive

[1]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[2]  F. Gibbons Sexual standards and reactions to pornography: Enhancing behavioral consistency through self-focused attention. , 1978 .

[3]  S. Duval,et al.  A theory of objective self awareness , 1972 .

[4]  A. Greenwald Consequences of Prejudice Against the Null Hypothesis , 1975 .

[5]  T. B. Rogers,et al.  Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. , 1977, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  C. G. Lord,et al.  Schemas and images as memory aids: Two modes of processing social information. , 1980 .

[7]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  Gain and loss of esteem as determinants of interpersonal attractiveness , 1965 .

[8]  T. B. Rogers,et al.  Encoding of Personal Information: Self-Other Differences. , 1979 .

[9]  E. Ebbesen,et al.  Determinants of selective memory about the self. , 1976, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[10]  F. Bartlett,et al.  Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology , 1932 .

[11]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. , 1975 .

[12]  Anthony G. Greenwald,et al.  Psychological foundations of attitudes , 1968 .

[13]  I. Lakatos Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1976 .

[14]  William A. Johnston,et al.  Individual performance and self-evaluation in a simulated team , 1967 .

[15]  R. A. Wicklund,et al.  Perspectives on cognitive dissonance , 1976 .

[16]  I. Lakatos,et al.  Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1970 .

[17]  D. Norman,et al.  Memory And Attention , 1968 .

[18]  P. Tannenbaum,et al.  Theories of cognitive consistency: a sourcebook. , 1968 .

[19]  J. Harvey,et al.  Actor-observer differences in the perceptions of responsibility and freedom. , 1975 .

[20]  G. Kelly,et al.  The psychology of personal constructs. Vol. 1. A theory of personality. Vol. 2. Clinical diagnosis and psychotherapy. , 1955 .

[21]  Stephen G. Gilligan,et al.  Remembering information related to one's self ☆ , 1979 .

[22]  E F Loftus,et al.  Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[23]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? , 1975 .

[24]  Daryl J. Bem,et al.  ON PREDICTING SOME OF THE PEOPLE SOME OF THE TIME: THE SEARCH FOR CROSS-SITUATIONAL CONSISTENCIES IN BEHAVIOR , 1974 .

[25]  R. Jervis Perception and misperception in international politics , 1976 .

[26]  H. Buschke,et al.  Hypermnesia for Socratic stimuli: The growth of recall for an internally generated memory list abstracted from a series of riddles , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[27]  John Cohen The Psychology of Ego-Involvements , 1948, Nature.

[28]  M. Snyder,et al.  Reconstructing the Past: Some Cognitive Consequences of Person Perception , 1978 .

[29]  E. E. Jones,et al.  The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. , 1972 .

[30]  S. Rosenzweig An experimental study of 'repression' with special reference to need-persistive and ego-defensive reactions to frustration. , 1943 .

[31]  M. Ross,et al.  Egocentric Biases in Availability and Attribution , 1979 .

[32]  R. W. White Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. , 1959, Psychological review.

[33]  G. Maruyama,et al.  Attribution, Affect, and College Exam Performance. , 1979 .

[34]  Edward E. Jones,et al.  Person perception 2nd ed. , 1979 .

[35]  The Psychology of Ego-Involvements , 1948 .

[36]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. , 1979 .

[37]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and Refutations , 1963 .

[38]  Dale T. Miller Ego involvement and attributions for success and failure. , 1976 .

[39]  B. Zeigarnik Das Behalten erledigter und unerledigter Handlungen , 1927 .

[40]  Ramon J. Rhine,et al.  Ego-involvement, discrepancy, source credibility, and attitude change. , 1970 .

[41]  H. Markus Self-schemata and processing information about the self. , 1977 .

[42]  Ebbe B. Ebbesen,et al.  Selective attention to the self: Situational and dispositional determinants. , 1973 .

[43]  Memory And Interpersonal Relations. , 1976 .

[44]  J. Laird,et al.  Awareness and attitude change in the forced-compliance paradigm: The importance of when. , 1976 .

[45]  E. Loftus,et al.  Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory , 1974 .

[46]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Twenty years of cognitive dissonance: case study of the evolution of a theory. , 1978, Psychological review.

[47]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Perceived Informativeness of Facts. , 1977 .

[48]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. , 1978 .

[49]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Inferences of personal characteristics on the basis of information retrieved from one's memory. , 1978 .

[50]  A. F. Glixman Recall of completed and incompleted activities under varying degrees of stress. , 1949, Journal of experimental psychology.

[51]  E. Voegelin The Origins of Totalitarianism , 2020, On Violence.

[52]  E. Hilgard Divided Consciousness: Multiple Controls In Human Thought And Action , 1977 .

[53]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  Egocentrism in groups: Self-serving biases or logical information processing? , 1977 .

[54]  S. Albert,et al.  Temporal comparison theory. , 1977 .

[55]  D. Bem Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. , 1967, Psychological review.

[56]  W. Swann,et al.  Hypothesis-Testing Processes in Social Interaction , 1978 .

[57]  W. Chaplin,et al.  Social competence and depression: the role of illusory self-perceptions. , 1980, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[58]  R. Krauss,et al.  Dissonance or defensiveness? , 1962, Journal of personality.

[59]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Basking in Reflected Glory: Three (Football) Field Studies , 1976 .

[60]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The Structure of Human Memory , 1976 .

[61]  D. Bem,et al.  Testing the self-perception explanation of dissonance phenomena: on the salience of premanipulation attitudes. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[62]  Norman H. Anderson,et al.  Effects of concomitant verbal recall on order effects in personality impression formation , 1963 .

[63]  E. E. Jones,et al.  From Acts To Dispositions The Attribution Process In Person Perception1 , 1965 .

[64]  P. Brickman,et al.  Lottery winners and accident victims: is happiness relative? , 1978, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[65]  G. Weary Examination of affect and egotism as mediators of bias in causal attributions. , 1980 .

[66]  Jerome D. Frank,et al.  Some psychological determinants of the level of aspiration. , 1935 .

[67]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Salience, Attention, and Attribution: Top of the Head Phenomena , 1978 .

[68]  A G Greenwald,et al.  Acceptance and recall of improvised arguments. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[69]  J. Brehm,et al.  Explorations in Cognitive Dissonance , 1962 .

[70]  E. E. Jones,et al.  Control of Attributions about the Self Through Self-handicapping Strategies: The Appeal of Alcohol and the Role of Underachievement , 1978 .

[71]  A. Greenwald On the inconclusiveness of “crucial” cognitive tests of dissonance versus self-perception theories , 1975 .

[72]  D. Cullen Attitude measurement by cognitive sampling. , 1968 .

[73]  H. Kelley,et al.  Communication And Persuasion , 1953 .

[74]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychology Review.

[75]  J. Rivera,et al.  Field theory as human-science : contributions of Lewin's Berlin group , 1977 .

[76]  C. I. Hovland The Order Of Presentation In Persuasion , 1966 .

[77]  W. Bowerman Subjective Competence: The Structure, Process and Function of Self‐referent Causal Attributions* , 1978 .

[78]  G. M. White,et al.  Involvement, Discrepancy, and Order of Presentation Effects on Attitude Change, Communication Displacement, and Communicator Evaluation. , 1976 .

[79]  George R. Goethals,et al.  The Perception of Consistency in Attitudes. , 1973 .

[80]  M. Brenner,et al.  The next-in-line effect , 1973 .

[81]  Gordon W. Allport,et al.  The ego in contemporary psychology. , 1943 .

[82]  P. Zimbardo,et al.  Involvement and communication discrepancy as determinants of opinion conformity. , 1960, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[83]  G. W. Bradley Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. , 1978 .

[84]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Attribution bias: On the inconclusiveness of the cognition-motivation debate , 1982 .

[85]  N. J. Slamecka,et al.  The Generation Effect: Delineation of a Phenomenon , 1978 .

[86]  K. Lewin,et al.  Untersuchungen zur Handlungs- und Affektpsychologie , 1927 .

[87]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Knowing with Certainty: The Appropriateness of Extreme Confidence. , 1977 .

[88]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[89]  A. Greenwald 6 – Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion, and Attitude Change1 , 1968 .

[90]  John G. Nicholls,et al.  Causal attributions and other achievement-related cognitions: Effects of task outcome, attainment value, and sex. , 1975 .

[91]  Leonard Berkowitz,et al.  Cognitive theories in social psychology : papers from Advances in experimental social psychology , 1978 .

[92]  L. Abramson,et al.  Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: sadder but wiser? , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[93]  E. Tulving,et al.  Episodic and semantic memory , 1972 .

[94]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[95]  Sidney Rosen,et al.  The Reluctance to Transmit Bad News , 1975 .

[96]  J. Harvey,et al.  Focus of attention, self-esteem, and the attribution of causality , 1976 .

[97]  A. Levy,et al.  The organizational functions of the self: An alternative to the Duval and Wicklund Model of self-awareness. , 1979 .

[98]  Charles S. Carver,et al.  Physical aggression as a function of objective self-awareness and attitudes toward punishment , 1975 .

[99]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Reasons for confidence. , 1980 .

[100]  I. Janis,et al.  An experimental study of psychological resistance to fear-arousing communications. , 1962, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[101]  Josef M. Nuttin Reward and punishment in human learning , 1968 .

[102]  S. Milgram BEHAVIORAL STUDY OF OBEDIENCE. , 1963, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[103]  S. Epstein The self-concept revisited. Or a theory of a theory. , 1973, The American psychologist.

[104]  Thomas V. Bonoma,et al.  Cognitive dissonance: Private ratiocination or public spectacle? , 1971 .