The effect of external supply knowledge acquisition, development activities and organizational status on the supply performance of SMEs

Abstract Given the increasingly strategic role of external resources, acquiring knowledge about current suppliers and the broader supply market is an important and demanding task for the purchasing and supply management (PSM) function of a firm. Performance-improvement-oriented application of external supply knowledge present further challenges for the function. To examine this, we draw on the knowledge-based view and develop a hypothesized model in which supply knowledge acquisition drives PSM exploration and exploitation orientations which in turn mediate the organizational status of PSM function in terms of supply performance. We test the model on an SME-focused and survey-based dataset, using structural equation modelling. Our results indicate that an exploitative orientation is associated with knowledge gained from the supply base, whereas an explorative orientation is predominantly associated with supply market knowledge and less with supply base knowledge, suggesting natural pairings. The findings also show how an exploitative development orientation mediates the positive association of the PSM function's organizational status with supply performance. Driven by supply base knowledge, a status-empowered exploitative PSM orientation may suppress supply market based explorative orientation in resource-scarce SMEs, thus appearing to serve as the sole path to supply performance. Our research contributes by pointing out the significance of the knowledge-resource, and the knowledge-based view, in understanding performance in PSM.

[1]  J. Ramsay.  Purchasing's strategic irrelevance , 2001 .

[2]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[3]  Augustine A. Lado,et al.  Strategic purchasing, supply management, and firm performance , 2004 .

[4]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[5]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[6]  Holger Schiele.  Supply-management maturity, cost savings and purchasing absorptive capacity: Testing the procurement–performance link , 2007 .

[7]  Benn Lawson,et al.  Determinants of knowledge transfer in inter‐firm new product development projects , 2012 .

[8]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Linking Routines to Operations Capabilities: A New Perspective , 2008 .

[9]  D. Luzzini,et al.  Assessing the use of External Grand Theories in Purchasing and Supply Management research , 2016 .

[10]  Evi Hartmann,et al.  Cross-functional integration and functional coordination in purchasing and supply management: Antecedents and effects on purchasing and firm performance , 2013 .

[11]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma , 2007 .

[12]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[13]  L. Stern,et al.  Conducting Interorganizational Research Using Key Informants , 1993 .

[14]  The Year 2000 Problem in the Supply Chain: A Managerial Perspective , 1999 .

[15]  Andreas Kuckertz,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Strategies, Profit Performance, and the Mediating Role of Strategic Learning: Escaping the Exploitation Trap , 2011 .

[16]  A. Colman,et al.  Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[17]  Judy A. Siguaw,et al.  Formative versus Reflective Indicators in Organizational Measure Development: A Comparison and Empirical Illustration , 2006 .

[18]  Lisa M. Ellram,et al.  The Impact of Purchasing and Supply Management Activities on Corporate Success , 2002 .

[19]  Tuomas Ahola,et al.  Managing external resources - preliminary results from a literature review , 2014 .

[20]  J. Mentzer,et al.  Does relationship learning lead to relationship value? A cross-national supply chain investigation , 2010 .

[21]  D. Ketchen,et al.  Information Processing, Knowledge Development, and Strategic Supply Chain Performance , 2004 .

[22]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[23]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation , 2006 .

[24]  R. Handfield,et al.  Creating supply chain relational capital: The impact of formal and informal socialization processes , 2006 .

[25]  Paul Humphreys,et al.  The evolution of the purchasing function , 1997 .

[26]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  R. Eltantawy,et al.  An empirical examination of strategic sourcing dominant logic: Strategic sourcing centricity , 2013 .

[28]  Richard J. Arend.  Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: how firm age and size affect the ‘capability enhancement–SME performance’ relationship , 2014 .

[29]  P. Cousins.  The alignment of appropriate firm and supply strategies for competitive advantage , 2005 .

[30]  Phillip L. Carter,et al.  SUPPLIER INNOVATIVENESS AND THE ROLE OF INTERORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING IN ENHANCING MANUFACTURER CAPABILITIES , 2008 .

[31]  Peter H. Gray,et al.  Task-driven learning: The antecedents and outcomes of internal and external knowledge sourcing , 2014, Inf. Manag..

[32]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  Toward a measure of competitive priorities for purchasing , 2001 .

[33]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[34]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Even Dwarfs Started Small: Liabilities of Age and Size and Their Strategic Implications , 1986 .

[35]  Zannie Giraud Voss,et al.  Strategic Ambidexterity in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Implementing Exploration and Exploitation in Product and Market Domains , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[36]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  HANDLING NONRESPONSE IN LOGISTICS RESEARCH , 2010 .

[37]  Stuart N. Adams.  Status Congruency as a Variable in Small Group Performance , 1953 .

[38]  Larry R. Smeltzer,et al.  An empirically based operational definition of strategic purchasing , 1997 .

[39]  D. Teece.  Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[40]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration , 2006 .

[41]  Kevin Zheng Zhou,et al.  How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing , 2012 .

[42]  Kenneth K. Boyer,et al.  Theorizing, testing, and concluding for mediation in SCM research: Tutorial and procedural recommendations , 2014 .

[43]  E. Autio,et al.  SOCIAL CAPITAL, KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION, AND KNOWLEDGE EXPLOITATION IN YOUNG TECHNOLOGY-BASED FIRMS , 2001 .

[44]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators , 2008 .

[45]  Thomas H. Brush,et al.  Comparing the resource-based and relational views: Knowledge transfer and spillover in vertical alliances , 2008 .

[46]  Gilbert A. Churchill.  A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[47]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[48]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[49]  A. Moorhouse,et al.  The changing role of procurement: Developing professional effectiveness , 2008 .

[50]  Richard L. Priem,et al.  A Demand‐side Perspective on Supply Chain Management , 2012 .

[51]  WangYinglei,et al.  Task-driven learning , 2014 .

[52]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .

[53]  Elkin Olaguer Pérez Sánchez,et al.  Measurement of potential absorption capacity in Colombia's innovative companies , 2017 .

[54]  Alexandra Van den Abbeele,et al.  Organizational Learning and Interfirm Control: The Effects of Partner Search and Prior Exchange Experiences , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[55]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[56]  Seth R. Silver,et al.  Taking Empowerment to the Next Level: A Multiple-Level Model of Empowerment, Performance, and Satisfaction , 2004 .

[57]  P. Cousins,et al.  THE IMPLICATIONS OF SOCIALIZATION AND INTEGRATION IN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT , 2006 .

[58]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[59]  Constantine Andriopoulos,et al.  Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[60]  S. Seibert.  TAKING EMPOWERMENT TO THE NEXT LEVEL : A MULTIPLE-LEVEL MODEL OF EMPOWERMENT , PERFORMANCE , AND SATISFACTION , 2004 .

[61]  Cristóbal Sánchez-Rodríguez.  Effect of strategic purchasing on supplier development and performance: a structural model , 2009 .

[62]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Strategizing Throughout the Organization: Managing Role Conflict in Strategic Renewal , 2000 .

[63]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  The Supply Base and Its Complexity: Implications For Transaction Costs, Risks, Responsiveness, and Innovation , 2006 .

[64]  Paul D. Cousins,et al.  HOW CAN SUPPLY MANAGEMENT REALLY IMPROVE PERFORMANCE? A KNOWLEDGE-BASED MODEL OF ALIGNMENT CAPABILITIES , 2015 .

[65]  K. Foerstl,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the “Purchasing and Supply Management Practice–Performance Link” , 2014 .

[66]  M. Tushman,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations , 2010 .

[67]  Lance W. Saunders,et al.  Examining supply market scanning and internal communication climate as facilitators of supply chain integration , 2015 .

[68]  Michael Quayle.  Purchasing in small firms , 2002 .

[69]  Veronica H. Villena,et al.  Knowledge Integration Taxonomy in Buyer-Supplier Relationships: Trade-Offs between Efficiency and Innovation , 2012 .

[70]  B. Menguc,et al.  Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity , 2005 .

[71]  Kevin J. Dooley,et al.  Supplier innovativeness, organizational learning styles and manufacturer performance: An empirical assessment , 2010 .

[72]  G. Wit,et al.  Do small businesses create more jobs? New evidence for Europe , 2014 .

[73]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[74]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[75]  C. Harland,et al.  An analysis of research into the future of purchasing and supply management , 2007 .

[76]  H. Harman.  Modern factor analysis , 1961 .

[77]  Robert Phaal,et al.  Technology Intelligence practice in UK technology-based companies , 2009, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[78]  A. Roth,et al.  The effect of an ambidextrous supply chain strategy on combinative competitive capabilities and business performance , 2010 .

[79]  J. Wisner,et al.  The determinants of service quality: issues for purchasing , 2002 .

[80]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[81]  Kent Eriksson,et al.  Experiential Knowledge and Costs in the Internationalization Process , 1997 .

[82]  Joel D. Wisner,et al.  Internal Relationships and Activities Associated with High Levels of Purchasing Service Quality , 1999 .

[83]  R. Handfield,et al.  An organizational entrepreneurship model of supply management integration and performance outcomes , 2009 .

[84]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. , 1978 .

[85]  Donna F. Davis,et al.  Grounding Supply Chain Management in Resource‐Advantage Theory: In Defense of a Resource‐Based View of the Firm , 2012 .

[86]  Fariborz Damanpour,et al.  The Application of External Knowledge: Organizational Conditions for Exploration and Exploitation , 2009 .

[87]  S. Zahra,et al.  A measure of absorptive capacity: Scale development and validation. , 2011 .

[88]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[89]  Sachin B. Modi,et al.  Supplier development: Improving supplier performance through knowledge transfer , 2007 .

[90]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[91]  James Flynn,et al.  Levels of strategic purchasing: Impact on supply integration and performance , 2006 .

[92]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[93]  Marco Paiola,et al.  A capability perspective on service business development in small and medium-sized suppliers , 2012 .

[94]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[95]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[96]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[97]  A. Roth,et al.  A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies , 1994 .

[98]  Linda Valeri,et al.  Mediation analysis allowing for exposure-mediator interactions and causal interpretation: theoretical assumptions and implementation with SAS and SPSS macros. , 2013, Psychological methods.

[99]  A. Weele,et al.  The Future of Purchasing and Supply Management Research: About Relevance and Rigor , 2014 .

[100]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences , 1993 .

[101]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  Supply chain management executives in corporate upper echelons , 2014 .

[102]  T. Eng.  An investigation into the mediating role of cross-functional coordination on the linkage between organizational norms and SCM performance , 2006 .

[103]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[104]  P. Bierly,et al.  Alternative Knowledge Strategies, Competitive Environment, and Organizational Performance in Small Manufacturing Firms , 2007 .

[105]  J. Barney.  Purchasing, Supply Chain Management and Sustained Competitive Advantage: The Relevance of Resource-based Theory , 2012 .

[106]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles , 2003 .