Adapting Clinical Ontologies in Real-World Environments

The desideratum of semantic interoperability has been intensively discussed in medical informatics circles in recent years. Originally, experts assumed that this issue could be sufficiently addressed by insisting simply on the application of shared clinical terminologies or clinical information models. However, the use of the term 'ontology' has been steadily increasing more recently. We discuss criteria for distinguishing clinical ontologies from clinical terminologies and information models. Then, we briefly present the role clinical ontologies play in two multicentric research projects. Finally, we discuss the interactions between these different kinds of knowledge representation artifacts and the stakeholders involved in developing interoperational real-world clinical applications. We provide ontology engineering examples from two EU-funded projects.

[1]  Martin Boeker,et al.  The @neurIST Ontology of Intracranial Aneurysms: Providing Terminological Services for an Integrated IT Infrastructure , 2007, AMIA.

[2]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications , 2003, Description Logic Handbook.

[3]  Michael Uschold,et al.  Ontologies: principles, methods and applications , 1996, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[4]  Werner Ceusters,et al.  Towards a Reference Terminology for Ontology Research and Development in the Biomedical Domain , 2006, KR-MED.

[5]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Sweetening Ontologies with DOLCE , 2002, EKAW.

[6]  Yarden Katz,et al.  Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner , 2007, J. Web Semant..

[7]  Viviana Mascardi,et al.  A Comparison of Upper Ontologies (Technical Report DISI-TR-06-21) , 2006 .

[8]  M. Ashburner,et al.  The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  Amnon Shabo,et al.  Model Formulation: HL7 Clinical Document Architecture, Release 2 , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[10]  Alan L. Rector,et al.  Binding Ontologies & Coding Systems to Electronic Health Records and Messages , 2006, KR-MED.

[11]  Olivier Bodenreider,et al.  The Ontology-Epistemology Divide: A Case Study in Medical Terminology. , 2004, Formal ontology in information systems : proceedings of the ... International Conference. FOIS.

[12]  Irene Mavrommati,et al.  Design principles , 2001 .

[13]  Dipak Kalra,et al.  The openEHR Foundation. , 2005, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[14]  Mehmet Kayaalp.  Why Do We Need Probabilistic Approaches to Ontologies and the Associated Data? , 2005, AMIA.

[15]  Barry Smith,et al.  Biodynamic ontology: applying BFO in the biomedical domain. , 2004, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[16]  Viviana Mascardi,et al.  A Comparison of Upper Ontologies , 2007, WOA.

[17]  A Rossi Mori,et al.  Exploiting the terminological approach from CEN/TC251 and GALEN to support semantic interoperability of healthcare record systems. , 1998, International journal of medical informatics.

[18]  Manolis Tsiknakis,et al.  The ACGT Master Ontology on Cancer – A New Terminology Source for Oncological Practice , 2008, 2008 21st IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems.

[19]  Sebastian Garde,et al.  Towards Semantic Interoperability for Electronic Health Records , 2007, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[20]  Ludger Jansen,et al.  On Ascribing Dispositions , 2007 .

[21]  Werner Ceusters,et al.  Reconciling users' needs and formal requirements: issues in developing a reusable ontology for medicine , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[22]  José L. V. Mejino,et al.  A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: the Foundational Model of Anatomy , 2003, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[23]  Josef Ingenerf,et al.  Standardized terminological services enabling semantic interoperability between distributed and heterogeneous systems , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.