Standing Up for the Victim, Siding with the Bully or Standing by? Bystander Responses in Bullying Situations

In this study we examined children's self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and outcome values in relation to bystander responses in bullying situations. We proposed that beyond the effect of self-efficacy, the decision to defend the victim of bullying vs. remain passive vs. reinforce the bully depends on outcomes children expect from defending, and on the value they place on these outcomes. Our sample consisted of 6397 Finnish children (3232 girls and 3165 boys) from third, fourth, and fifth grades (mean ages 9–11 years). Results showed that the motivational underpinnings of defending the victim, remaining passive, and reinforcing the bully varied. Defending was associated with the expectation that the victim feels better as a result of defending as well as valuing such an outcome. Reinforcement of bullying was associated with negative expectations and not caring about the positive outcomes. Conflicting expectations and values were linked to remaining passive. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for anti-bullying interventions.

[1]  C. Salmivalli,et al.  Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviour in bullying situations , 2004 .

[2]  M. Camodeca,et al.  Aggression, social cognitions, anger and sadness in bullies and victims. , 2005, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[3]  G. Altoé,et al.  Determinants of adolescents' active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying. , 2008, Journal of adolescence.

[4]  Christina Salmivalli,et al.  Unique and Interactive Effects of Empathy and Social Status on Involvement in Bullying , 2009 .

[5]  Christina Salmivalli,et al.  "I'm OK but you're not" and other peer-relational schemas: explaining individual differences in children's social goals. , 2005, Developmental psychology.

[6]  T. Vaillancourt,et al.  Bullying Is Power , 2003 .

[7]  Frits A. Goossens,et al.  Peer Group Affiliation of Children: The Role of Perceived Popularity, Likeability, and Behavioral Similarity in Bullying , 2010 .

[8]  Elisa Poskiparta,et al.  Bystanders Matter: Associations Between Reinforcing, Defending, and the Frequency of Bullying Behavior in Classrooms , 2011, Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53.

[9]  D. Pepler,et al.  Peer involvement in bullying: insights and challenges for intervention. , 1999, Journal of adolescence.

[10]  D. G. Perry,et al.  Peers' perceptions of the consequences that victimized children provide aggressors. , 1990, Child development.

[11]  M. Camodeca,et al.  Children's opinions on effective strategies to cope with bullying: the importance of bullying role and perspective , 2005 .

[12]  J. Eccles,et al.  The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis , 1992 .

[13]  J. Juvonen,et al.  Social Motives Underlying Antisocial Behavior Across Middle School Grades , 2008 .

[14]  E. Andreou,et al.  The relationship of academic and social cognition to behaviour in bullying situations among Greek primary school children , 2004 .

[15]  John W. Atkinson,et al.  Introduction: Motivation , 1964 .

[16]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[17]  D. Cross,et al.  Bullying in Schools: Australia: the Friendly Schools project , 2004 .

[18]  C. Salmivalli,et al.  Victims and their defenders: A dyadic approach , 2011 .

[19]  Gianluca Gini,et al.  Active Defending and Passive Bystanding Behavior in Bullying: The Role of Personal Characteristics and Perceived Peer Pressure , 2010, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[20]  C. Salmivalli,et al.  Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group , 1998 .

[21]  A. Bandura Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[22]  R. L. Rosnow,et al.  Effect sizes for experimenting psychologists. , 2003, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[23]  J. Eccles,et al.  Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[24]  Michael J. Boulton,et al.  Associations between Secondary School Pupils' Definitions of Bullying, Attitudes towards Bullying, and Tendencies to Engage in Bullying: Age and sex differences , 2002 .

[25]  C. Salmivalli,et al.  From Peer Putdowns to Peer Support: A Th eoretical Model and How It Translated into a National Anti-Bullying Program , 2009 .

[26]  K Rigby,et al.  Bullying among Australian school children: reported behavior and attitudes toward victims. , 1991, The Journal of social psychology.

[27]  C. Salmivalli,et al.  What Does It Take to Stand Up for the Victim of Bullying?: The Interplay Between Personal and Social Factors , 2010 .

[28]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  K. Rigby Effects of peer victimization in schools and perceived social support on adolescent well-being. , 2000, Journal of adolescence.

[30]  Ken Rigby,et al.  Expressed Readiness of Australian Schoolchildren to Act as Bystanders in Support of Children who are Being Bullied , 2006 .

[31]  C. Ferguson An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. , 2009 .

[32]  D. Pepler,et al.  Naturalistic Observations of Peer Interventions in Bullying , 2001 .

[33]  C. Salmivalli,et al.  Empirical test of bullies' status goals: assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige. , 2009, Aggressive behavior.

[34]  Paul O'Connell,et al.  Peer processes in bullying: Informing prevention and intervention strategies. , 2010 .

[35]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Bullying in schools: Mainstream and special needs , 1992 .

[36]  S. Herzberger,et al.  Outcome expectancies and outcome values as predictors of children's aggression , 1998 .

[37]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[38]  P. Slee Situational and interpersonal correlates of anxiety associated with peer victimisation , 1994, Child psychiatry and human development.

[39]  K. Frey,et al.  Observed reductions in school bullying, nonbullying aggression, and destructive bystander behavior: A longitudinal evaluation. , 2009 .

[40]  Peter K. Smith The nature of school bullying : a cross-national perspective , 1999 .

[41]  Karin S. Frey,et al.  Reducing playground bullying and supporting beliefs: an experimental trial of the steps to respect program. , 2005, Developmental psychology.

[42]  Tracy Vaillancourt,et al.  Aggression and social status: the moderating roles of sex and peer‐valued characteristics , 2006 .

[43]  D. Olweus,et al.  Bullying at school : what we know and what we can do / Dan Olweus , 1993 .

[44]  D. G. Perry,et al.  Cognitive social learning mediators of aggression. , 1986, Child development.

[45]  David M Williams,et al.  A review of the outcome expectancy construct in physical activity research , 2005, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.