Perceptual Ranges, Information Gathering, and Foraging Success in Dynamic Landscapes

How organisms gather and utilize information about their landscapes is central to understanding land-use patterns and population distributions. When such information originates beyond an individual’s immediate vicinity, movement decisions require integrating information out to some perceptual range. Such nonlocal information, whether obtained visually, acoustically, or via chemosensation, provides a field of stimuli that guides movement. Classically, however, models have assumed movement based on purely local information (e.g., chemotaxis, step-selection functions). Here we explore how foragers can exploit nonlocal information to improve their success in dynamic landscapes. Using a continuous time/continuous space model in which we vary both random (diffusive) movement and resource-following (advective) movement, we characterize the optimal perceptual ranges for foragers in dynamic landscapes. Nonlocal information can be highly beneficial, increasing the spatiotemporal concentration of foragers on their resources up to twofold compared with movement based on purely local information. However, nonlocal information is most useful when foragers possess both high advective movement (allowing them to react to transient resources) and low diffusive movement (preventing them from drifting away from resource peaks). Nonlocal information is particularly beneficial in landscapes with sharp (rather than gradual) patch edges and in landscapes with highly transient resources.

[1]  Yuan Lou,et al.  Evolutionarily Stable and Convergent Stable Strategies in Reaction–Diffusion Models for Conditional Dispersal , 2014, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[2]  A. M. Edwards,et al.  Revisiting Lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses, bumblebees and deer , 2007, Nature.

[3]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  Charles H. Janson,et al.  Experimental analysis of food detection in capuchin monkeys: effects of distance, travel speed, and resource size , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[5]  S. Reader,et al.  Spatial Discounting of Food and Social Rewards in Guppies (Poecilia Reticulata) , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[6]  G. Pyke Optimal Foraging Theory: A Critical Review , 1984 .

[7]  T. Valone,et al.  Public Information: From Nosy Neighbors to Cultural Evolution , 2004, Science.

[8]  P. Moorcroft,et al.  Analytic steady-state space use patterns and rapid computations in mechanistic home range analysis , 2007, Journal of mathematical biology.

[9]  Joan Iverson Nassauer The appearance of ecological systems as a matter of policy , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[10]  Frederic Bartumeus,et al.  Fractal reorientation clocks: Linking animal behavior to statistical patterns of search , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Cristóbal López,et al.  Optimal search in interacting populations: Gaussian jumps versus Lévy flights. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Can spatial variation alone lead to selection for dispersal , 1983 .

[13]  P. Zollner Comparing the landscape level perceptual abilities of forest sciurids in fragmented agricultural landscapes* , 2000, Landscape Ecology.

[14]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  Context-dependent perceptual ranges and their relevance to animal movements in landscapes , 2004 .

[15]  Patrick A. Zollner,et al.  Using body size to predict perceptual range , 2002 .

[16]  R. Swihart,et al.  Body size, niche breadth, and ecologically scaled responses to habitat fragmentation: mammalian predators in an agricultural landscape , 2003 .

[17]  Marcus Vinícius Vieira,et al.  Does land use affect perceptual range? Evidence from two marsupials of the Atlantic Forest , 2011 .

[18]  Peter Leimgruber,et al.  From Fine-Scale Foraging to Home Ranges: A Semivariance Approach to Identifying Movement Modes across Spatiotemporal Scales , 2014, The American Naturalist.

[19]  C. Schmeiser,et al.  Global existence for chemotaxis with finite sampling radius , 2006 .

[20]  E. Charnov Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[21]  C. J. Downing Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: effects on perceptual quality. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Lee J. Bain,et al.  An exponential power life-testing distribution , 1975 .

[23]  Daniel Fortin,et al.  Optimal searching behaviour: the value of sampling information , 2002 .

[24]  Leslie Ries,et al.  Ecological Responses to Habitat Edges: Mechanisms, Models, and Variability Explained , 2004 .

[25]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[26]  Chris Cosner,et al.  A dynamic model for the ideal-free distribution as a partial differential equation. , 2005, Theoretical population biology.

[27]  C. M. Lessells Putting resource dynamics into continuous input ideal free distribution models , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  Paul R Moorcroft,et al.  Mechanistic home range models and resource selection analysis: a reconciliation and unification. , 2006, Ecology.

[29]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Landscape-level perceptual abilities in white-footed mice : perceptual range and the detection of forested habitat , 1997 .

[30]  Andrew M. Hein,et al.  Sensing and decision-making in random search , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  T. Schweder Advanced Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations , 2007 .

[32]  William F. Fagan,et al.  Search and navigation in dynamic environments – from individual behaviors to population distributions , 2008 .

[33]  Iain D. Couzin,et al.  Signalling and the Evolution of Cooperative Foraging in Dynamic Environments , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[34]  Luděk Berec,et al.  Mixed encounters, limited perception and optimal foraging , 2000, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[35]  V. V. Krishnan,et al.  The Effects of Edge Permeability and Habitat Geometry on Emigration from Patches of Habitat , 1987, American Naturalist.

[36]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[37]  Charles H. Janson,et al.  Experimental evidence for route integration and strategic planning in wild capuchin monkeys , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[38]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  Spatial memory and animal movement. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[39]  S. Kauffman,et al.  Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes. , 1987, Journal of theoretical biology.

[40]  I. Couzin,et al.  Emergent Sensing of Complex Environments by Mobile Animal Groups , 2013, Science.

[41]  R. Cressman,et al.  Migration Dynamics for the Ideal Free Distribution , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[42]  Karline Soetaert,et al.  Solving Differential Equations in R: Package deSolve , 2010 .

[43]  H. Stanley,et al.  Optimizing the success of random searches , 1999, Nature.

[44]  Robert J. Jr. Fletcher,et al.  Signal detection theory clarifies the concept of perceptual range and its relevance to landscape connectivity , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[45]  E. Ranta,et al.  Size of environmental grain and resource matching , 2000 .

[46]  B. Stone Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) use a laser pointer to indicate distal objects , 2008 .

[47]  Justin M. Calabrese,et al.  A comparison-shopper's guide to connectivity metrics , 2004 .

[48]  Alan C. Hindmarsh,et al.  Description and use of LSODE, the Livermore Solver for Ordinary Differential Equations , 1993 .

[49]  Y. Lou,et al.  On several conjectures from evolution of dispersal , 2012, Journal of biological dynamics.

[50]  D. Morris Habitat-dependent population regulation and community structure , 1988, Evolutionary Ecology.

[51]  Ben T. Hirsch,et al.  Tradeoff between travel speed and olfactory food detection in ring-tailed coatis (Nasua nasua) , 2010 .

[52]  Cristóbal López,et al.  Optimizing the search for resources by sharing information: Mongolian gazelles as a case study. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[53]  Chloe Bracis,et al.  Memory Effects on Movement Behavior in Animal Foraging , 2015, PloS one.

[54]  H. Higuchi,et al.  Foraging Patch Selection and Departure by Non‐Omniscient Foragers: A Field Example in White‐Fronted Geese , 2006 .

[55]  Michael L. Johnson,et al.  Evolution of Dispersal: Theoretical Models and Empirical Tests Using Birds and Mammals , 1990 .

[56]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  A Review of Image Denoising Algorithms, with a New One , 2005, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[57]  C. Cosner,et al.  How Resource Phenology Affects Consumer Population Dynamics , 2016, The American Naturalist.

[58]  Karline Soetaert,et al.  Reactive transport in aquatic ecosystems: Rapid model prototyping in the open source software R , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[59]  C. Cosner,et al.  Approximating the ideal free distribution via reaction–diffusion–advection equations , 2008 .

[60]  C. Cosner,et al.  Evolutionary stability of ideal free nonlocal dispersal , 2012, Journal of biological dynamics.

[61]  John M. Fryxell,et al.  Opposing Rainfall and Plant Nutritional Gradients Best Explain the Wildebeest Migration in the Serengeti , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[62]  H. Dreisig Ideal free distributions of nectar foraging bumblebees , 1995 .

[63]  J. Pleasants Optimal Foraging by Nectarivores: A Test of the Marginal-Value Theorem , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[64]  E. Pianka,et al.  Animal foraging: past, present and future. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[65]  A. Mogilner,et al.  A non-local model for a swarm , 1999 .

[66]  J M J Travis,et al.  Prospecting and dispersal: their eco-evolutionary dynamics and implications for population patterns , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[67]  H. Van Dyck,et al.  Landscape Structure Shapes Habitat Finding Ability in a Butterfly , 2012, PloS one.

[68]  Manfred Milinski,et al.  LONG-TERM MEMORY FOR FOOD PATCHES AND IMPLICATIONS FOR IDEAL FREE DISTRIBUTIONS IN STICKLEBACKS' , 1993 .

[69]  Michael R. Conover,et al.  Predator-Prey Dynamics: The Role of Olfaction , 2007 .

[70]  P. Bednekoff Models of Adaptive Behaviour: An Approach based on State , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[71]  M. McPeek,et al.  The Evolution of Dispersal in Spatially and Temporally Varying Environments , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[72]  S. L. Lima,et al.  SEARCH STRATEGIES FOR LANDSCAPE‐LEVEL INTERPATCH MOVEMENTS , 1999 .

[73]  Massimo Vergassola,et al.  ‘Infotaxis’ as a strategy for searching without gradients , 2007, Nature.

[74]  Tom Tregenza,et al.  Building on the Ideal Free Distribution , 1995 .

[75]  明 大久保,et al.  Diffusion and ecological problems : mathematical models , 1980 .

[76]  Arjan Boonman,et al.  It's not black or white—on the range of vision and echolocation in echolocating bats , 2013, Front. Physiol..

[77]  Jeffrey R. Stevens,et al.  Will Travel for Food: Spatial Discounting in Two New World Monkeys , 2005, Current Biology.

[78]  Donald E. Spalinger,et al.  Foraging behavior of browsing ruminants in a heterogeneous landscape , 1998, Landscape Ecology.

[79]  Shuichi Matsumura,et al.  Foraging on spatially distributed resources with sub‐optimal movement, imperfect information, and travelling costs: departures from the ideal free distribution , 2010 .

[80]  A. Ansart,et al.  Context dependence of the olfactory perceptual range in the generalist land snail Cornu aspersum , 2015 .

[81]  Dorothy M Fragaszy,et al.  Multi‐step routes of capuchin monkeys in a laser pointer traveling salesman task , 2014, American journal of primatology.

[82]  Volker Grimm,et al.  Integrating individual search and navigation behaviors in mechanistic movement models , 2011, Theoretical Ecology.

[83]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .