Adaptive underwater sonar surveys in the presence of strong currents

We consider the task of conducting underwater surveys with a sonar-equipped autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) in environments with strong currents. More specifically, this topic is addressed in the context of mine countermeasure operations employing synthetic aperture sonar (SAS) sensors. Two complementary algorithms that allow the AUV to autonomously adapt its survey route based on sophisticated sensor data it collects in situ, while respecting the unique constraints imposed by the problem, are proposed. The algorithms allow the AUV to (i) adapt its survey heading based on the presence of currents to ensure quality data is collected, and (ii) adapt its survey route to reinspect the most suspicious objects at additional aspects. The flexibility to immediately react in situ to the environmental and tactical conditions sensed during the mission allow the most useful data for object recognition purposes to be collected efficiently. By obviating the recovery and redeployment of the AUV, as well as laboratory-based data-processing during the interregnum, the overall mission timeline can be greatly compressed and operational costs can be reduced. Experimental results illustrating the real-time execution of the proposed algorithms on an AUV are shown for a completely autonomous mission conducted in the North Sea.

[1]  Hanumant Singh,et al.  Imaging Underwater for Archaeology , 2000 .

[2]  David P. Williams,et al.  Adaptive Multiview Target Classification in Synthetic Aperture Sonar Images Using a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process , 2012, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[3]  Stefan B. Williams,et al.  AUV Benthic Habitat Mapping in South Eastern Tasmania , 2009, FSR.

[4]  David P. Williams.  Image-quality prediction of synthetic aperture sonar imagery , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[5]  David P. Williams,et al.  In situ AUV survey adaptation using through-the-sensor sonar data , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[6]  A. Bellettini,et al.  Theoretical accuracy of synthetic aperture sonar micronavigation using a displaced phase-center antenna , 2002 .

[7]  C. W. Warren,et al.  A technique for autonomous underwater vehicle route planning , 1990, Symposium on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Technology.

[8]  Y. Petillot,et al.  Integrated MCM missions using heterogeneous fleets of AUVs , 2012, 2012 Oceans - Yeosu.

[9]  Michael P. Hayes,et al.  Broad-band synthetic aperture sonar , 1992 .

[10]  Sandra L. Berger.  Massachusetts , 1896, The Journal of comparative medicine and veterinary archives.

[11]  Yvan R. Petillot,et al.  The fusion of large scale classified side-scan sonar image mosaics , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[12]  Howie Choset,et al.  Coverage Path Planning: The Boustrophedon Cellular Decomposition , 1998 .

[13]  Paul Newman.  MOOS - Mission Orientated Operating Suite , 2008 .

[14]  David P. Williams,et al.  Exploiting Environmental Information for Improved Underwater Target Classification in Sonar Imagery , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[15]  Torstein Olsmo Sæbø,et al.  Challenges in Seafloor Imaging and Mapping With Synthetic Aperture Sonar , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  Junku Yuh,et al.  Design and Control of Autonomous Underwater Robots: A Survey , 2000, Auton. Robots.

[17]  Yvan Petillot,et al.  Real time AUV pipeline detection and tracking using side scan sonar and multi-beam echo-sounder , 2002, OCEANS '02 MTS/IEEE.

[18]  Yan Pailhas,et al.  Path Planning for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[19]  David P. Williams.  Fast Target Detection in Synthetic Aperture Sonar Imagery: A New Algorithm and Large-Scale Performance Analysis , 2015, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.