Use of animated text to improve the learning of basic mathematics

A small detail can have large consequences. Current technological systems have opened up a huge world of possibilities for teachers at all levels and in every field. This research study concerns the role that can be played by technological resources to improve or promote the cognitive processes that make understanding and learning possible. More specifically it is meant to examine, within the framework of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning and of the Cognitive Load Theory, put forward by Mayer and Sweller respectively, the benefits that the introduction of slight changes in multimedia materials - in this case, the application of an animation effect to a handwritten text of a mathematical nature - can have over learning quantity and quality. The study involved 255 students in the 2nd and 3rd years of the Spanish secondary education (Educacion Secundaria Obligatoria, ESO), who received a computer-based lesson in video podcast format about elementary event probability. Results suggest that suitable inclusion of an animation effect in the materials can facilitate the cognitive processes that specialise in selecting information, building representation models, and making sense, thus promoting students' learning ability. A slight change in multimedia learning materials can effectively boost student learning.An animated effect that improves the synchronisation of verbal and visual information facilitates the cognitive processes.The gradual presentation of written information catches student attention, enhancing the processing of relevant information.The presence of animated elements in multimedia materials enables students to better memorise and apply what they learn.

[1]  J. Sweller Element Interactivity and Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load , 2010 .

[2]  R. Mayer,et al.  A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. , 2000 .

[3]  O. McGarr,et al.  A review of podcasting in higher education: Its influence on the traditional lecture , 2009 .

[4]  Béatrice S. Hasler,et al.  Learner Control, Cognitive Load and Instructional Animation , 2007 .

[5]  A. Paivio Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. , 1991 .

[6]  Simon J. Thompson,et al.  Podcasting by synchronising PowerPoint and voice: What are the pedagogical benefits? , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  Does animation in user interfaces improve decision making? , 1996, CHI.

[8]  C. Spearman THEORY OF GENERAL FACTOR1 , 1946 .

[9]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive load theory, the transient information effect and e-learning , 2012 .

[10]  A. Baddeley Recent developments in working memory , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[11]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: What works in the design of agent , 2003 .

[12]  John Sweller,et al.  Instructional Animations: More Complex to Learn from Than at First Sight? , 2011, INTERACT.

[13]  John Sweller,et al.  Instructional Design in Technical Areas , 1999 .

[14]  Elisabeth Dunne,et al.  Medical students’ perceptions of video-linked lectures and video-streaming , 2010 .

[15]  J. Sweller Implications of Cognitive Load Theory for Multimedia Learning , 2005, The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning.

[16]  A. Paivio Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .

[17]  M A Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1990 What one intelligence test measures : A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test , 2016 .

[18]  John Sweller,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: The Split-Attention Principle in Multimedia Learning , 2005 .

[19]  R. Mayer,et al.  Engaging students in active learning: The case for personalized multimedia messages. , 2000 .

[20]  Susan Watt,et al.  Podcasts: Are they an effective tool to enhance student learning? A Case Study , 2010 .

[21]  Robert B. Kozma,et al.  A reply: Media and methods , 1994 .

[22]  Fred Paas,et al.  Animations showing Lego manipulative tasks: Three potential moderators of effectiveness , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[23]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[24]  R. Clark Media will never influence learning , 1994 .

[25]  Tamara van Gog,et al.  Learning from video modeling examples: Effects of seeing the human model's face , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Kent J. Crippen,et al.  Considering the Efficacy of Web-based Worked Examples in Introductory Chemistry , 2004 .

[27]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[28]  C. Raven Canine Leptospirosis in Pennsylvania , 1941 .

[29]  R. Mayer,et al.  Animations need narrations : an experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis , 1991 .

[30]  Eugene Sam Paik,et al.  Learning with Animation and the Illusion of Understanding. , 2013 .

[31]  R. Mayer,et al.  How Seductive Details Do Their Damage: A Theory of Cognitive Interest in Science Learning , 1998 .

[32]  R. Mayer,et al.  Aids to computer-based multimedia learning , 2002 .

[33]  P. Robert-Jan Simons,et al.  Streaming video to enhance students' reflection in dance education , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[34]  R. Mayer,et al.  The instructive animation: helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning , 1992 .

[35]  A. Baddeley Working memory: looking back and looking forward , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[36]  C. Spearman General intelligence Objectively Determined and Measured , 1904 .

[37]  R. Mayer,et al.  A Split-Attention Effect in Multimedia Learning: Evidence for Dual Processing Systems in Working Memory , 1998 .

[38]  Cheryl I. Johnson,et al.  Revising the Redundancy Principle in Multimedia Learning. , 2008 .

[39]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning , 2005 .

[40]  Fred Paas,et al.  Making instructional animations more effective: a cognitive load approach , 2007 .

[41]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[42]  Claire Jarvis,et al.  Acknowledging the ‘forgotten’ and the ‘unknown’: The role of video podcasts for supporting field-based learning , 2009 .

[43]  Alex Shafarenko,et al.  Teaching mathematical explanation through audiographic technology , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[44]  A. Baddeley The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[45]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity , 1999 .

[46]  Benjamin H. Layne,et al.  Color, graphics, and animation in a computer-assisted learning tutorial lesson , 1988 .

[47]  R. Mayer,et al.  For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. , 1994 .

[48]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Signaling as a Cognitive Guide in Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[49]  Simon B. Heilesen What is the academic efficacy of podcasting? , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[50]  Robin H. Kay,et al.  Exploring the use of video podcasts in education: A comprehensive review of the literature , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[51]  R. Mayer,et al.  When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? , 2001 .

[52]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[53]  Richard Catrambone,et al.  Making the abstract concrete: Visualizing mathematical solution procedures , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..