Upper San Pedro Basin: fostering collaborative binational watershed management

Successful binational planning and management of water resources is a complex process dependent on informed decision‐making across diverse economic, social and political sectors. Additional technical and scientific information is often required as a part of this process. A critical factor in this process is how effectively social and physical scientists can help build collaboration and trust among stakeholders, water and land managers, and policy‐makers. Within the international San Pedro River Basin, disparities between Mexico and the USA regarding economic development and political orientation, combined with a highly variable and complex physical setting, suggest that the successful engagement of scientists with communities and stakeholders will be essential for addressing challenges in water management. Based upon concepts associated with collective action theory, adaptive management and conflict resolution, the present paper proposes a process for fostering collaborative binational water management in basins such as the San Pedro that span international borders.

[1]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[2]  M. Jamail,et al.  International Water Use Relations Along the Sonoran Desert Borderlands , 1979 .

[3]  T. E. Sheridan,et al.  Where the Dove Calls: The Political Ecology of a Peasant Corporate Community in Northwestern Mexico. , 1989 .

[4]  J. Stephen Lansing,et al.  Priests and Programmers: Technologies of Power in the Engineered Landscape of Bali , 1992 .

[5]  R. Hinde,et al.  Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action Collective Action , 2010 .

[6]  D. Woolhiser,et al.  Southern oscillation effects on daily precipitation in the southwestern United States , 1993 .

[7]  G. Brady.  Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[8]  S. Chamala,et al.  Participative approaches for Landcare: perspectives, policies and programs. , 1995 .

[9]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  A Brief Primer on Participation: Philosophy and Practice , 1995 .

[10]  R. Carter.  Sustaining the Soil: Indigenous Soil and Water Conservation in Africa , 1997 .

[11]  A. Dougill.  Sustaining the Soil: Indigenous soil and water conservation in Africa , 1997 .

[12]  Thomas H. Wakeman.  Engineering Leadership in Public Policy Resolution , 1997 .

[13]  I. Scoones,et al.  Sustaining the soil: Indigenous soil and water conservation in Africa , 1998 .

[14]  Robert G. Varady,et al.  Openness, Sustainability, and Public Participation: New Designs for Transboundary River Basin Institutions , 1999 .

[15]  John K. Gamman,et al.  Bioregional Conflict Resolution: Rebuilding Community in Watershed Planning and Organizing , 1999, Environmental management.

[16]  R. Chepesiuk.  Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy , 2000 .

[17]  R. Varady,et al.  Water Management Options for the Upper San Pedro Basin: Assessing the Social and Institutional Landscape , 2000 .

[18]  Stephen P. Mumme,et al.  Applied and Theoretical Aspects of Binational Watershed Councils (Consejos de Cuencas) in the U.S.-Mexico Borderlands , 2001 .

[19]  María Teresa Vázquez-Castillo.  Mexico‐US Bilateral Planning: Institutions, Planners and Communities , 2001 .

[20]  W. Leach,et al.  Making Watershed Partnerships Work: A Review of the Empirical Literature , 2001 .

[21]  S. Peña.  Land use planning on the U.S.‐Mexico border: A comparison of the legal framework , 2002 .

[22]  H. Diaz,et al.  Climate variability and climate change, and their impacts on the freshwater resources in the Border Region: a case study for Sonora, Mexico. , 2003 .

[23]  H. Arias.  Land cover changes and climate fluctuations in the upper San Pedro River Basin in Sonora, Mexico. , 2003 .

[24]  M. Grbeša,et al.  Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions of collective action , 2006 .