Relational information in sentence memory

This paper is concerned with the coding and retrieval of relational or case information in sentences. Two experiments test the strong dependence hypothesis that relational information is checked in a secondary stage following the retrieval of facts from memory, where facts are retrieved on the basis of concept-overlap alone. In particular, memory for agent and object relational information in simple reversible sentences was investigated. The first experiment showed that relational information affected the reaction time and accuracy of the falsification of sentences that could have been rejected on the basis of content information alone. The second experiment approached the same issues using a recall procedure. It demonstrated the existence of some relational memory, even in the absence of any content recall. Both sets of data argued against the dependence hypothesis, but were compatible with the hypothesis that relational information is neither dependent on, nor secondary to, content information. The current findings and previous results concerning the impact of relational distinctions on interference effects are discussed in the context of the desirable properties of information retrieval systems.

[1]  Surface and deep structure in sentence comprehension , 1975 .

[2]  Scott E. Fahlman,et al.  NETL: A System for Representing and Using Real-World Knowledge , 1979, CL.

[3]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Thematization and sentence retrieval , 1974 .

[4]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  The effects of delay and interference: A speed-accuracy study , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  K. Rayner,et al.  Long-term recognition memory for sentences , 1976 .

[6]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Associative Interference and Retrieval Dynamics in Yes-No Recall and Recognition. , 1977 .

[7]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  Empirical approaches to information processing: Speed-accuracy tradeoff functions or reaction time — a reply , 1979 .

[8]  K. Wender,et al.  Models for within-proposition representation tested by cued recall , 1979 .

[9]  C. T. James,et al.  Recognition memory for active and passive sentences , 1977 .

[10]  A. Wearing Remembering Complex Sentences , 1972 .

[11]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Representation and retention of verbatim information , 1977 .

[12]  Ray Adams,et al.  Memory for Sentences: The Subject Superiority Effect , 1981 .

[13]  Michael Shafto,et al.  The space for case , 1973 .

[14]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Explorations in Cognition , 1975 .

[15]  A. Healy,et al.  The relative accessibility of semantic and deep-structure syntactic concepts , 1978, Memory & cognition.

[16]  A. Wearing The storage of complex sentences , 1970 .

[17]  John R. Anderson Language, Memory, and Thought , 1976 .

[18]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Psychology of Language , 1974 .

[19]  G. Bower,et al.  Human Associative Memory , 1973 .

[20]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Semantic Memory Retrieval: Analysis by Speed Accuracy Tradeoff Functions* , 1978, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  John C. Schmitt,et al.  Empirical approaches to information processing: Speed-accuracy tradeoff functions or reaction time , 1977 .