Integration of hydraulic and chemical signalling in the control of stomatal conductance and water status of droughted plants

We describe here an integration of hydraulic and chemical signals which control stomatal conductance of plants in drying soil, and suggest that such a system is more likely than control based on chemical signals or water relations alone. The determination of xylem [ABA] and the stomatal response to xylem [ABA] are likely to involve the water flux through the plant. (1) If, as seems likely, the production of a chemical message depends on the root water status (Ψr), it will not depend solely on the soil water potential (Ψs) but also on the flux of water through the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum, to which are linked the difference between Ψr and Ψs. (2) The water flux will also dilute the concentration of the message in the xylem sap. (3) The stomatal sensitivity to the message is increased as leaf water potential falls. Stomatal conductance, which controls the water flux, therefore would be controlled by a water-flux-dependent message, with a water-flux-dependent sensitivity. In such a system, we have to consider a common regulation for stomatal conductance, leaf and root water potentials, water flux and concentration of ABA in the xylem. In order to test this possibility, we have combined equations which describe the generation and effects of chemical signals and classical equations of water flux. When the simulation was run for a variety of conditions, the solution suggested that such common regulation can operate. Simulations suggest that, as well as providing control of stomatal conductance, integration of chemical and hydraulic signalling may also provide a control of leaf water potential and of xylem [ABA], features which are apparent from our experimental data. We conclude that the root message would provide the plant with a means to sense the conditions of water extraction (soil water status and resisance to water flux) on a daily timescale, while the short-term plant response to this message would depend on the evaporative demand.

[1]  Jianhua Zhang,et al.  Stomatal control by both [ABA] in the xylem sap and leaf water status: a test of a model for draughted or ABA‐fed field‐grown maize , 1993 .

[2]  William J. Davies,et al.  Xylem‐transported abscisic acid: the relative importance of its mass and its concentration in the control of stomatal aperture , 1993 .

[3]  Ulrich Schurr,et al.  Stomatal response to drying soil in relation to changes in the xylem sap composition of Helianthus annuus. II.Stomatal sensitivity to abscisic acid imported from the xylem sap , 1992 .

[4]  Jianhua Zhang,et al.  What information is conveyed by an ABA signal from maize roots in drying field soil , 1992 .

[5]  O. Bethenod,et al.  Xylem ABA controls the stomatal conductance of field‐grown maize subjected to soil compaction or soil drying , 1992 .

[6]  W. Davies,et al.  Stomatal response to abscisic Acid is a function of current plant water status. , 1992, Plant physiology.

[7]  François Tardieu,et al.  Modeling root water potential and soil-root water transport. I. Model presentation , 1991 .

[8]  Nader Katerji,et al.  Some plant factors controlling evapotranspiration , 1991 .

[9]  Jianhua Zhang,et al.  Antitranspirant Activity in Xylem Sap of Maize Plants , 1991 .

[10]  William J. Davies,et al.  Root Signals and the Regulation of Growth and Development of Plants in Drying Soil , 1991 .

[11]  Hermann Heilmeier,et al.  Daily and seasonal courses of leaf conductance and abscisic acid in the xylem sap of almond trees [Prunus dulcis (Miller) D. A. Webb] under desert conditions , 1990 .

[12]  D. Grantz.  Plant response to atmospheric humidity , 1990 .

[13]  W. Hartung,et al.  Long Distance Transport of Abscisic Acid in NaCI-Treated Intact Plants of Lupinus albus , 1990 .

[14]  Jianhua Zhang,et al.  Changes in the concentration of ABA in xylem sap as a function of changing soil water status can account for changes in leaf conductance and growth , 1990 .

[15]  M. Canny.  Tansley Review No. 22 What becomes of the transpiration stream? , 1990, The New phytologist.

[16]  Jianhua Zhang,et al.  Sequential response of whole plant water relations to prolonged soil drying and the involvement of xylem sap ABA in the regulation of stomatal behaviour of sunflower plants , 1989 .

[17]  Paul J. Kramer,et al.  Changing concepts regarding plant water relations , 1988 .

[18]  W. Hartung,et al.  Abscisic Acid Movement into the Apoplastic solution of Water-Stressed Cotton Leaves: Role of Apoplastic pH. , 1988, Plant physiology.

[19]  J. Passioura,et al.  Water Transport in and to Roots , 1988 .

[20]  N. Katerji,et al.  Etude de quelques critères indicateurs de l'état hydrique d'une culture de tomate en région semi-aride , 1988 .

[21]  M. van Noordwijk,et al.  Roots, plant production and nutrient use efficiency , 1987 .

[22]  J. Passioura,et al.  The Effect of Soil Strength on the Growth of Young Wheat Plants , 1987 .

[23]  J. D. Hesketh,et al.  PREEXISTING CHANNELS AND SOYBEAN ROOTING PATTERNS , 1986 .

[24]  K. Cornish,et al.  Abscisic Acid Accumulation by Roots of Xanthium strumarium L. and Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. in Relation to Water Stress. , 1985, Plant physiology.

[25]  D. W. Stewart,et al.  INDICATORS OF WATER STRESS IN CORN (Zea mays L.) , 1984 .

[26]  Jb Passioura,et al.  Hydraulic Resistance of Plants. I. Constant or Variable , 1984 .

[27]  W. Hartung.  The site of action of abscisic acid at the guard cell plasmalemma of Valerianella locusta , 1983 .

[28]  P. Tinker.  Transport of Water to Plant Roots in Soil , 1976 .

[29]  P. Nye,et al.  The Influence of Soil Water Content on the Uptake of Ions by Roots. I. Soil Water Content Gradients Near a Plane of Onion Roots , 1973 .

[30]  E. Newman.  Resistance to Water Flow in Soil and Plant. II. A Review of Experimental Evidence on the Rhizosphere Resistance , 1969 .

[31]  W. R. Gardner.  DYNAMIC ASPECTS OF WATER AVAILABILITY TO PLANTS , 1960 .

[32]  T. H. Honert,et al.  Water transport in plants as a catenary process , 1948 .