Structural Basis for the Restoration of TCR Recognition of an MHC Allelic Variant by Peptide Secondary Anchor Substitution

Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I variants H-2Kb and H-2Kbm8 differ primarily in the B pocket of the peptide-binding groove, which serves to sequester the P2 secondary anchor residue. This polymorphism determines resistance to lethal herpes simplex virus (HSV-1) infection by modulating T cell responses to the immunodominant glycoprotein B498-505 epitope, HSV8. We studied the molecular basis of these effects and confirmed that T cell receptors raised against Kb–HSV8 cannot recognize H-2Kbm8–HSV8. However, substitution of SerP2 to GluP2 (peptide H2E) reversed T cell receptor (TCR) recognition; H-2Kbm8–H2E was recognized whereas H-2Kb–H2E was not. Insight into the structural basis of this discrimination was obtained by determining the crystal structures of all four MHC class I molecules in complex with bound peptide (pMHCs). Surprisingly, we find no concerted pMHC surface differences that can explain the differential TCR recognition. However, a correlation is apparent between the recognition data and the underlying peptide-binding groove chemistry of the B pocket, revealing that secondary anchor residues can profoundly affect TCR engagement through mechanisms distinct from the alteration of the resting state conformation of the pMHC surface.

[1]  R. Dyall,et al.  The critical role of a solvent-exposed residue of an MHC class I-restricted peptide in MHC-peptide binding. , 1997, International immunology.

[2]  E. Klechevsky,et al.  Modification of a Tumor-Derived Peptide at an HLA-A2 Anchor Residue Can Alter the Conformation of the MHC-Peptide Complex: Probing with TCR-Like Recombinant Antibodies1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[3]  I. Messaoudi,et al.  Direct Link Between mhc Polymorphism, T Cell Avidity, and Diversity in Immune Defense , 2002, Science.

[4]  Simon J Davis,et al.  Molecular interactions mediating T cell antigen recognition. , 2003, Annual review of immunology.

[5]  Bernard Malissen,et al.  What do TCR-pMHC crystal structures teach us about MHC restriction and alloreactivity? , 2003, Trends in immunology.

[6]  J. Sacchettini,et al.  A Structural Difference Limited to One Residue of the Antigenic Peptide Can Profoundly Alter the Biological Outcome of the TCR-Peptide/MHC Class I Interaction1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[7]  D. Busch,et al.  Coordinate regulation of complex T cell populations responding to bacterial infection. , 1998, Immunity.

[8]  R. Tisch,et al.  Class I Major Histocompatibility Complex Anchor Substitutions Alter the Conformation of T Cell Receptor Contacts* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Two-step binding mechanism for T-cell receptor recognition of peptide–MHC , 2002, Nature.

[10]  I. Messaoudi,et al.  The mode of ligand recognition by two peptide:MHC class I-specific monoclonal antibodies. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[11]  P. A. Peterson,et al.  Quantitation of peptide anchor residue contributions to class I major histocompatibility complex molecule binding. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[12]  T. Schumacher,et al.  Polymorphisms in pockets of major histocompatibility complex class I molecules influence peptide preference , 1993, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[13]  P. A. Peterson,et al.  Crystal structure of an H-2Kb-ovalbumin peptide complex reveals the interplay of primary and secondary anchor positions in the major histocompatibility complex binding groove. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  D. Wiley,et al.  T Cell Receptor–MHC Interactions up Close , 2001, Cell.

[15]  P. A. Peterson,et al.  Crystal structures of two viral peptides in complex with murine MHC class I H-2Kb. , 1994, Science.

[16]  K. Garcia,et al.  Structural basis of T cell recognition. , 1999, Annual review of immunology.

[17]  M. A. Saper,et al.  The foreign antigen binding site and T cell recognition regions of class I histocompatibility antigens , 1987, Nature.

[18]  M. Lawrence,et al.  Shape complementarity at protein/protein interfaces. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  F. Carbone,et al.  The effect of mutations in the MHC class I peptide binding groove on the cytotoxic T lymphocyte recognition of the Kb‐restricted ovalbumin determinant , 1990, European journal of immunology.

[20]  L. Pease,et al.  Minor pocket B influences peptide binding, peptide presentation and alloantigenicity of H-2Kb. , 1994, International immunology.

[21]  C. Nelson,et al.  Structural and Functional Consequences of Altering a Peptide MHC Anchor Residue1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[22]  H. Rammensee,et al.  Peptides naturally presented by MHC class I molecules. , 1993, Annual review of immunology.

[23]  J. Geliebter,et al.  Murine major histocompatibility complex class-I mutants: molecular analysis and structure-function implications. , 1986, Annual review of immunology.

[24]  P. A. Peterson,et al.  Emerging principles for the recognition of peptide antigens by MHC class I molecules. , 1992, Science.

[25]  M. Bevan,et al.  Role of self-peptides in positively selecting the T-cell repertoire , 1990, Nature.

[26]  Roger A. Sayle,et al.  PdbAlign, PdbDist and DistAlign: tools to aid in relating sequence variability to structure , 1995, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[27]  R J Read,et al.  Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. , 1998, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[28]  I. Messaoudi,et al.  MHC Polymorphism Can Enrich the T Cell Repertoire of the Species by Shifts in Intrathymic Selection , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[29]  D. Madden The three-dimensional structure of peptide-MHC complexes. , 1995, Annual review of immunology.

[30]  Mike Carson,et al.  Ribbon models of macromolecules , 1987 .

[31]  J. Abastado,et al.  Class I MHC is stabilized against thermal denaturation by physiological concentrations of NaCl. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[32]  E. Unanue,et al.  Cutting Edge: A Single MHC Anchor Residue Alters the Conformation of a Peptide-MHC Complex Inducing T Cells That Survive Negative Selection1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[33]  N. G. Saito,et al.  Recognition of an MHC class I-restricted antigenic peptide can be modulated by para-substitution of its buried tyrosine residues in a TCR-specific manner. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[34]  D. Fremont,et al.  Functional Evidence That Conserved TCR CDRα3 Loop Docking Governs the Cross-Recognition of Closely Related Peptide:Class I Complexes1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[35]  M R Jackson,et al.  The crystal structures of K(bm1) and K(bm8) reveal that subtle changes in the peptide environment impact thermostability and alloreactivity. , 2001, Immunity.

[36]  Z. Otwinowski,et al.  Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[37]  Vasso Apostolopoulos,et al.  Structural Comparison of Allogeneic and Syngeneic T Cell Receptor–Peptide-Major Histocompatibility Complex Complexes , 2002, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[38]  P. Bjorkman,et al.  Thermal stability comparison of purified empty and peptide-filled forms of a class I MHC molecule. , 1992, Science.

[39]  J. Frelinger,et al.  Peptidic Termini Play a Significant Role in TCR Recognition1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[40]  J. Thornton,et al.  Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  H. Hunt,et al.  Peptide interactions with the Kb antigen recognition site. , 1991, Journal of immunology.

[42]  D. Fremont,et al.  T cell receptor (TCR) recognition of MHC class I variants: intermolecular second-site reversion provides evidence for peptide/MHC conformational variation , 1996, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[43]  P. Allen,et al.  Altered peptide ligand-induced partial T cell activation: molecular mechanisms and role in T cell biology. , 1996, Annual review of immunology.

[44]  J. Zou,et al.  Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. , 1991, Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography.

[45]  M. Theobald,et al.  Conformational differences in major histocompatibility complex-peptide complexes can result in alloreactivity , 1994, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[46]  K. Sharp,et al.  Protein folding and association: Insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons , 1991, Proteins.