The effects of environmental transport policies on the environment, economy and employment in Portugal

Abstract The transport sector, accountable for a large share of climate change and pollution, is on the verge of changing over the coming decades. To lead it through the best path, carefully designed public transport policies are needed, since they have several important secondary effects on the society and economy. However, their assessment is not straightforward, as the transport sector comprises millions of actors with heterogeneous behavior. This study estimates the impacts of the promotion of market- and command-and-control based pro-environmental transport policies on the mobility, environment and economy. For the case study of Portugal, several sets of policies until 2050 were tested by means of a ‘what-if’ type policy analysis using the ASTRA-EC model, and the results were compared with a business-as-usual scenario. The results show that the policies are effective at shifting passenger travelling to public transportation, but care must be taken when promoting the market deployment of clean vehicles or penalizing those less clean, due to a rebound effect on car usage. The largest CO2 emissions reductions (26%) are related to the application of policies promoting the deployment of electric vehicles, suggesting that this is an essential measure to curb emissions. It was also observed that cleaner vehicles complying with post-Euro 6 emissions standard are important at reducing pollutants (by up to −27%). This happens at the same time as economy is improved by 0.5–1.1% and employment by 0.22%, i.e., tackling the issue of transportation is synergic with the economy. Despite the encouraging results in relative terms, absolute transport emissions in Portugal in 2050 increase by at least 15% in relation to 1990, far short from the environmental objectives to significantly cut emissions.

[1]  S de Bruyn,et al.  Literature review on employment impacts of GHG reduction policies for transport , 2012 .

[2]  Damon Honnery,et al.  Greening passenger transport: a review , 2013 .

[3]  José Manuel Viegas,et al.  Transport policy and environmental impacts: The importance of multi-instrumentality in policy integration , 2007 .

[4]  Patrícia Fortes,et al.  Assessing the cost-effectiveness of electric vehicles in European countries using integrated modeling , 2015 .

[5]  P. Baptista,et al.  Promotion of renewable energy sources in the Portuguese transport sector: A scenario analysis , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[6]  The European transport policy: Its main issues , 2013 .

[7]  Hilde Meersman,et al.  The contribution of transport infrastructure to economic activity: The case of Belgium , 2017 .

[8]  Claus Hedegaard Sørensen,et al.  Different Pathways for Achieving Cleaner Urban Areas: A Roadmap towards the White Paper Goal for Urban Transport☆ , 2016 .

[9]  Franklin Farell Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area: Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system , 2014 .

[10]  J. Bergh,et al.  Spatial organization, transport, and climate change: Comparing instruments of spatial planning and policy , 2008 .

[11]  Decrypting fare-free public transport in Tallinn, Estonia , 2017 .

[12]  D. Morillón,et al.  Review and analysis of urban mobility strategies in Mexico , 2017 .

[13]  Pietro Evangelista,et al.  Environmental Sustainability in Third-Party Logistics Service Providers: A Systematic Literature Review from 2000–2016 , 2018 .

[14]  Ian Bailey,et al.  European environmental taxes and charges: economic theory and policy practice , 2002 .

[15]  Filipe Moura,et al.  Electric vehicle diffusion in the Portuguese automobile market , 2016 .

[16]  Aonghus McNabola,et al.  Analysing the Co-Benefits of transport fleet and fuel policies in reducing PM2.5 and CO2 emissions , 2018 .

[17]  M. Porter Towards a dynamic theory of strategy , 1991 .

[18]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Energy and environmental impacts of alternative pathways for the Portuguese road transportation sector , 2012 .

[19]  Lidia Andrés,et al.  Driving factors of GHG emissions in the EU transport activity , 2018 .

[20]  Nora Giacobbe,et al.  Transport and greenhouse gas emissions , 2009 .

[21]  Seppo Junnila,et al.  Carbon and material footprints of a welfare state: Why and how governments should enhance green investments , 2018, Environmental Science & Policy.

[22]  Andreas Uihlein,et al.  How can our cars become less polluting? An assessment of the environmental improvement potential of cars , 2010 .

[23]  E. Jochem,et al.  Introduction to Energy Systems Modelling , 2012 .

[24]  F. Hinterberger,et al.  The economic benefits of environmental policy , 2009 .

[25]  T. Gärling,et al.  Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users : A research review , 2013 .

[26]  M. Madaleno,et al.  New cars and emissions: effects of policies, macroeconomic impacts and cities characteristics in Portugal , 2017 .