Computed tomography-based anatomic assessment overestimates local tumor recurrence in patients with mass-like consolidation after stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE To investigate pulmonary radiologic changes after lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), to distinguish between mass-like fibrosis and tumor recurrence. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eighty consecutive patients treated with 3- to 5-fraction SBRT for early-stage peripheral non-small cell lung cancer with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were reviewed. The mean biologic equivalent dose received was 150 Gy (range, 78-180 Gy). Patients were followed with serial CT imaging every 3 months. The CT appearance of consolidation was defined as diffuse or mass-like. Progressive disease on CT was defined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. Positron emission tomography (PET) CT was used as an adjunct test. Tumor recurrence was defined as a standardized uptake value equal to or greater than the pretreatment value. Biopsy was used to further assess consolidation in select patients. RESULTS Median follow-up was 24 months (range, 12.0-36.0 months). Abnormal mass-like consolidation was identified in 44 patients (55%), whereas diffuse consolidation was identified in 12 patients (15%), at a median time from end of treatment of 10.3 months and 11.5 months, respectively. Tumor recurrence was found in 35 of 44 patients with mass-like consolidation using CT alone. Combined with PET, 10 of the 44 patients had tumor recurrence. Tumor size (hazard ratio 1.12, P=.05) and time to consolidation (hazard ratio 0.622, P=.03) were predictors for tumor recurrence. Three consecutive increases in volume and increasing volume at 12 months after treatment in mass-like consolidation were highly specific for tumor recurrence (100% and 80%, respectively). Patients with diffuse consolidation were more likely to develop grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis (odds ratio 26.5, P=.02) than those with mass-like consolidation (odds ratio 0.42, P=.07). CONCLUSION Incorporating the kinetics of mass-like consolidation and PET to the current criteria for evaluating posttreatment response will increase the likelihood of correctly identifying patients with progressive disease after lung SBRT.

[1]  Branislav Jeremic,et al.  Stereotactic hypofractionated radiation therapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. , 2005, Lung cancer.

[2]  H. Libshitz,et al.  Complications of radiation therapy: the thorax. , 1974, Seminars in roentgenology.

[3]  Masahiro Hiraoka,et al.  Clinical outcomes of a phase I/II study of 48 Gy of stereotactic body radiotherapy in 4 fractions for primary lung cancer using a stereotactic body frame. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  M. Okada,et al.  [New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours-revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)]. , 2009, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.

[5]  E. Kunieda,et al.  Possible misinterpretation of demarcated solid patterns of radiation fibrosis on CT scans as tumor recurrence in patients receiving hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for lung cancer. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  V. Lowe,et al.  Persistent or recurrent bronchogenic carcinoma: detection with PET and 2-[F-18]-2-deoxy-D-glucose. , 1994, Radiology.

[7]  H. Libshitz,et al.  Radiographic appearance of the chest following extended field radiation therapy for Hodgkin's disease. A consideration of time‐dose relationships , 1973, Cancer.

[8]  Andrea Bezjak,et al.  Stereotactic body radiation therapy for inoperable early stage lung cancer. , 2010, JAMA.

[9]  N. Gross Pulmonary effects of radiation therapy. , 1977, Annals of internal medicine.

[10]  M. Hiraoka,et al.  Evaluation of mass-like consolidation after stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung tumors , 2007, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  S. Kuribayashi,et al.  Radiation injury after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for peripheral small lung tumors: serial changes on CT. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  K. Sheng,et al.  Size matters: a comparison of T1 and T2 peripheral non-small-cell lung cancers treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). , 2010, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[13]  Lech Papiez,et al.  Stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non-small-cell lung carcinoma: four-year results of a prospective phase II study. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.