Protecting Eyewitness Evidence: Examining the Efficacy of a Self-Administered Interview Tool

Given the crucial role of eyewitness evidence, statements should be obtained as soon as possible after an incident. This is not always achieved due to demands on police resources. Two studies trace the development of a new tool, the Self-Administered Interview (SAI), designed to elicit a comprehensive initial statement. In Study 1, SAI participants reported more correct details than participants who provided a free recall account, and performed at the same level as participants given a Cognitive Interview. In Study 2, participants viewed a simulated crime and half recorded their statement using the SAI. After a delay of 1 week, all participants completed a free recall test. SAI participants recalled more correct details in the delayed recall task than control participants.

[1]  R. Milne,et al.  The cognitive interview: A survey of its forensic effectiveness , 1999 .

[2]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting , 2007 .

[3]  E. Ebbesen,et al.  Retention interval and eyewitness memory for events and personal identifying attributes. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Retrieval blocks in episodic and semantic memory. , 1982 .

[5]  Michael P. Toglia,et al.  Memory for events , 2007 .

[6]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Biased Retellings of Events Yield Biased Memories , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  R. Bull,et al.  The cognitive interview: Its origins, empirical support, evaluation and practical implications , 1991 .

[8]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Disparate Effects of Repeated Testing: Reconciling Ballard's (1913) and Bartlett's (1932) Results , 1992 .

[9]  S. Penrod,et al.  Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. , 1986 .

[10]  J. Yuille,et al.  Lost but not forgotten details: repeated eyewitness recall leads to reminiscence but not hypermnesia. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  R. Fisher,et al.  Enhancing Older Adult Eyewitness Memory with the Cognitive Interview , 1996 .

[12]  Sean M. Lane,et al.  How events are reviewed matters: Effects of varied focus on eyewitness suggestibility , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Sentence memory: A theoretical analysis ☆ , 1990 .

[14]  R. Fisher,et al.  Field test of the Cognitive Interview: enhancing the recollection of actual victims and witnesses of crime. , 1989, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  N. Kerr,et al.  The Psychology of the courtroom , 1981 .

[16]  R. Fisher,et al.  Enhancing enhanced eyewitness memory: Refining the cognitive interview. , 1987 .

[17]  P. E. Morris,et al.  Memory in everyday life , 1988 .

[18]  Kevin Allan,et al.  Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other's memories for an event? , 2003 .

[19]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  How eyewitnesses talk about events: implications for memory , 2005 .

[20]  A. Wilkinson,et al.  Generality of a strength model for three conditions of repeated recall , 1984 .

[21]  John R. Anderson.  A spreading activation theory of memory. , 1983 .

[22]  Lynne M. Reder,et al.  A theoretical review of the misinformation effect: Predictions from an activation-based memory model , 1998 .

[23]  E F Loftus,et al.  Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[24]  W A Wickelgren,et al.  Retention functions for syntactic and lexical vs semantic information in sentence recognition memory , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[25]  Ray Bull,et al.  Back to basics: a componential analysis of the original cognitive interview mnemonics with three age groups , 2002 .

[26]  E. Sagarin,et al.  Convicted but Innocent: Wrongful Conviction and Public Policy , 1996 .

[27]  Frederick G. Conrad,et al.  Intersections in Basic and Applied Memory Research , 1997 .

[28]  M. McCloskey,et al.  Misleading postevent information and memory for events: arguments and evidence against memory impairment hypotheses. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Altering memory representations through retrieval. , 1985 .

[30]  Richard M. Shiffrin,et al.  SAM: A theory of probabilistic search in associative memory. , 1980 .

[31]  J. Read,et al.  The Effects of Delay on Long-Term Memory for Witnessed Events , 2007 .

[32]  J. Wixted,et al.  Genuine power curves in forgetting: A quantitative analysis of individual subject forgetting functions , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[33]  P. Brock,et al.  Examining the cognitive interview in a double-test paradigm. , 1999 .

[34]  R. Milne,et al.  Police officers' perceptions of eyewitness performance in forensic investigations. , 1998, The Journal of social psychology.

[35]  M. Conway,et al.  On the Very Long-Term Retention of Knowledge Acquired Through Formal Education: Twelve Years of Cognitive Psychology , 1991 .

[36]  R. Cheloha,et al.  The of a Development , 2004 .

[37]  Elizabeth Frankenberg,et al.  Lost but Not Forgotten , 2001 .

[38]  R. Bull,et al.  The cognitive interview: A meta-analysis , 1999 .

[39]  A. Damasio.  Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition , 1989, Cognition.

[40]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Facilitation and impairment of event memory produced by photograph review , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[41]  V. Reyna,et al.  Development of Gist versus Verbatim Memory in Sentence Recognition: Effects of Lexical Familiarity, Semantic Content, Encoding Instructions, and Retention Interval. , 1994 .

[42]  K. Pickel.  When a lie becomes the truth: The effects of self‐generated misinformation on eyewitness memory , 2004, Memory.

[43]  M. Johnson,et al.  Aging and the effects of affective and factual focus on source monitoring and recall. , 1994, Psychology and aging.

[44]  M. Kebbell,et al.  Hypnotic interviewing: the best way to interview eyewitnesses? , 1998, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[45]  Ronald P. Fisher,et al.  Implications of output-bound measures for laboratory and field research in memory , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[46]  A. Memon,et al.  On the "general acceptance" of eyewitness testimony research. A new survey of the experts. , 2001, The American psychologist.

[47]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Qualitative effects of rehearsal on memories for perceived and imagined complex events. , 1988 .

[48]  W. Furey.  In Ten Years , 1995, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[49]  Lost but not forgotten details: repeated eyewitness recall leads to reminiscence but not hypermnesia. , 1994 .

[50]  K. Greenwood,et al.  The efficacy of mnemonic components of the cognitive interview: towards a shortened variant for time-critical investigations† , 2005 .

[51]  J. Yuille,et al.  A case study of eyewitness memory of a crime. , 1986, The Journal of applied psychology.

[52]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Retrieval-induced forgetting in an eyewitness-memory paradigm , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[53]  R. Holliday,et al.  Enhancing the recall of young, young–old and old–old adults with cognitive interviews , 2007 .

[54]  D. Stephen Lindsay,et al.  Misleading Suggestions Can Impair Eyewitnesses' Ability to Remember Event Details , 1990 .

[55]  R. Fisher,et al.  Facilitating children's eyewitness recall with the revised cognitive interview. , 1995, The Journal of applied psychology.

[56]  A. Koriat,et al.  What do we know about what we cannot remember? Accessing the semantic attributes of words that cannot be recalled. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[57]  Strategic regulation of grain size in memory reporting over time , 2005 .

[58]  J. Dennett,et al.  The cognitive interview technique: Reviving the issues , 1993 .

[59]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[60]  Ronald P. Fisher,et al.  Improving eyewitness testimony with the Cognitive Interview , 1994 .

[61]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Retrieval practice and the maintenance of knowledge. , 1988 .

[62]  Neil Brewer,et al.  The influence of schemas, stimulus ambiguity, and interview schedule on eyewitness memory over time. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[63]  J. Wixted,et al.  On the Form of Forgetting , 1991 .

[64]  D. Rubin,et al.  One Hundred Years of Forgetting : A Quantitative Description of Retention , 1996 .

[65]  M. Zaragoza.  Memory and testimony in the child witness , 1995 .

[66]  Saul M. Kassin,et al.  On the "general acceptance" of eyewitness testimony research. A new survey of the experts. , 2001, American Psychologist.

[67]  R. Fisher,et al.  Memory-Enhancing Techniques for Investigative Interviewing: The Cognitive Interview , 1992 .

[68]  V. Reyna,et al.  Development of Gist Versus Verbatim Memory in Sentence Recognition: Effects of Lexical Familiarity, Semantic Content, Encoding Instructions, and Retention Interval , 1994 .

[69]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Altering memory through recall: The effects of cue-guided retrieval processing , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[70]  Osteitis Deformans.  ON A FORM , 2002 .