The limits of theoretical population genetics.

THE purpose here is to discuss the limits of theoretical population genetics. This 100-year-old field now sits close to the heart of modern biology. Theoretical population genetics is the framework for studies of human history (Reich et al. 2002) and the foundation for association studies, which aim to map the genes that cause human disease (Jorde 1995). Arguably of more importance, theoretical population genetics underlies our knowledge of within-species variation across the globe and for all kinds of life. In light of its many incarnations and befitting its ties to evolutionary biology, the limits of theoretical population genetics are recognized to be changing over time, with a number of new paths to follow. Stepping into this future, it will be important to develop new approximations that reflect new data and not to let well-accepted models diminish the possibilities.

[1]  M Kimura,et al.  SOLUTION OF A PROCESS OF RANDOM GENETIC DRIFT WITH A CONTINUOUS MODEL. , 1955, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1931 .

[3]  W. Ewens,et al.  Fixation probabilities of additive alleles in diploid populations , 1995 .

[4]  D. Couvet,et al.  Estimation of effective population size and migration rate from one- and two-locus identity measures. , 2001, Genetics.

[5]  L. Wahl,et al.  Fixation Probability Favors Increased Fecundity Over Reduced Generation Time , 2004, Genetics.

[6]  M. Norman,et al.  Error estimate for the diffusion approximation of the Wright--Fisher model. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Mandy J. Haldane,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Natural and Artificial Selection, Part V: Selection and Mutation , 1927, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[8]  S. Wright Evolution in mendelian populations , 1931 .

[9]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  Human genome sequence variation and the influence of gene history, mutation and recombination , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[10]  R. Nielsen,et al.  Using nuclear haplotypes with microsatellites to study gene flow between recently separated Cichlid species , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[11]  Peter Beerli,et al.  Early Origin and Recent Expansion of Plasmodium falciparum , 2003, Science.

[12]  Alexei J Drummond,et al.  Estimating mutation parameters, population history and genealogy simultaneously from temporally spaced sequence data. , 2002, Genetics.

[13]  A. Kolmogoroff Über die analytischen Methoden in der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung , 1931 .

[14]  G. Hardy MENDELIAN PROPORTIONS IN A MIXED POPULATION. , 1908 .

[15]  R. Hudson,et al.  A numerical method for calculating moments of coalescent times in finite populations with selection , 1989, Journal of mathematical biology.

[16]  J. Crow Eighty years ago: the beginnings of population genetics. , 1988, Genetics.

[17]  F. Tajima Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. , 1983, Genetics.

[18]  J. Gilmour,et al.  Demes: A Suggested New Terminology , 1939, Nature.

[19]  M. Wade,et al.  THE CAUSES OF NATURAL SELECTION , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  J. Kingman Origins of the coalescent. 1974-1982. , 2000, Genetics.

[21]  M. Norman Approximation of Stochastic Processes by Gaussian Diffusions, and Applications to Wright-Fisher Genetic Models , 1975 .

[22]  Richard R. Hudson,et al.  TESTING THE CONSTANT‐RATE NEUTRAL ALLELE MODEL WITH PROTEIN SEQUENCE DATA , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[23]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  On the dominance ratio , 1990 .

[24]  Peter Donnelly,et al.  Genealogical processes for Fleming-Viot models with selection and recombination , 1999 .

[25]  T. Nagylaki,et al.  The strong-migration limit in geographically structured populations , 1980, Journal of mathematical biology.

[26]  W. Provine,et al.  The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics , 1972 .

[27]  M. Kimura Stochastic processes and distribution of gene frequencies under natural selection. , 1955, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[28]  J. Gillespie IS THE POPULATION SIZE OF A SPECIES RELEVANT TO ITS EVOLUTION? , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  B D Latter,et al.  The island model of population differentiation: a general solution. , 1973, Genetics.

[30]  T. Maruyama,et al.  On the fixation probability of mutant genes in a subdivided population. , 1970, Genetical research.

[31]  J. Drake,et al.  Rates of spontaneous mutation. , 1998, Genetics.

[32]  Stephen M. Krone,et al.  The genealogy of samples in models with selection. , 1997, Genetics.

[33]  H. Wilkinson-Herbots,et al.  Genealogy and subpopulation differentiation under various models of population structure , 1998 .

[34]  M. Notohara,et al.  The coalescent and the genealogical process in geographically structured population , 1990, Journal of mathematical biology.

[35]  N L Kaplan,et al.  The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. , 1989, Genetics.

[36]  Stephen M. Krone,et al.  Ancestral Processes with Selection , 1997, Theoretical population biology.

[37]  J. Hey,et al.  X chromosome evidence for ancient human histories. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  J. Wakeley Polymorphism and divergence for island-model species. , 2003, Genetics.

[39]  N. H. Barton,et al.  COALESCENCE IN A RANDOM BACKGROUND , 2004 .

[40]  J. Doob Stochastic processes , 1953 .

[41]  L. Jorde Linkage disequilibrium as a gene-mapping tool. , 1995, American journal of human genetics.

[42]  T. Nagylaki Models and approximations for random genetic drift. , 1990 .

[43]  T. Nagylaki Gustave Malécot and the transition from classical to modern population genetics. , 1989, Genetics.

[44]  John Wakeley,et al.  Gene genealogies when the sample size exceeds the effective size of the population. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.