Joint workspace of parallel kinematic machines

Robot workspace is the set of positions a robot can reach. Workspace is one of the most useful measures for the evaluation of a robot. Workspace is usually defined as the reachable space of the end-effector in Cartesian coordinate system. However, it can be defined in joint coordinate system in terms of joint motions. In this paper, workspace of the end-effector is called task workspace, and workspace of the joint motions is called joint workspace. Joint workspace of a parallel kinematic machine (PKM) is focused, and a tripod machine tool with three degrees of freedom (DOF) is taken as an example. To study the joint workspace of this tripod machine tool, the forward kinematic model is established, and an interpolating approach is proposed to solve this model. The forward kinematic model is used to determine the joint workspace, which occupies a portion of the domain of joint motions. The following contributions have been made in this paper include: (i) a new concept so-called joint workspace has been proposed for design optimization and control of a PKM; (ii) an approach is developed to determine joint workspace based on the structural constraints of a PKM; (iii) it is observed that the trajectory planning in the joint coordinate system is not reliable without taking into considerations of cavities or holes in the joint workspace.

[1]  Federico Thomas,et al.  On the computation of the direct kinematics of parallel spherical mechanisms using Bernstein polynomials , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[2]  Chia-Hsiang Menq,et al.  The dexterous workspace of simple manipulators , 1988, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[3]  Roger W. Brockett,et al.  Kinematic Dexterity of Robotic Mechanisms , 1994, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[4]  C. Gosselin,et al.  On the direct kinematics of spherical three-degree-of-freedom parallel manipulators of general architecture , 1994 .

[5]  Fengfeng Xi,et al.  Development of a sliding-leg tripod as an add-on device for manufacturing , 2001, Robotica.

[6]  Andrew K. C. Wong,et al.  A dexterity measure for robot manipulators , 1990, Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  A Global Performance Index for the Kinematic Optimization of Robotic Manipulators , 1991 .

[8]  Tsuneo Yoshikawa,et al.  Manipulability of Robotic Mechanisms , 1985 .

[9]  A. H. Soni,et al.  Workspace synthesis of 3R, 4R, 5R and 6R robots , 1985 .

[10]  J. Angeles,et al.  Kinematic Isotropy and the Conditioning Index of Serial Robotic Manipulators , 1992 .

[11]  Kadri Bürüncük,et al.  On the kinematic of a 3‐DOF Stewart platform , 1999 .

[12]  Kenneth J. Waldron,et al.  The Workspaces of a Mechanical Manipulator , 1981 .

[13]  Ben-Zion Sandler,et al.  Tripod robot with cylindrically actuated limbs: Structure and kinematics , 2002 .

[14]  Kok-Meng Lee,et al.  Dynamic analysis of a three-degrees-of-freedom in-parallel actuated manipulator , 1988, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[15]  K. C. Gupta,et al.  Design Considerations for Manipulator Workspace , 1982 .

[16]  Kenneth J. Waldron,et al.  Direct kinematic solution of a Stewart platform , 1990, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[17]  D. C. H. Yang,et al.  On the Dexterity of Robotic Manipulators—Service Angle , 1985 .