The Evolution of Data Fusion Methodologies Developed to Reconstruct Coronary Artery Geometry From Intravascular Imaging and Coronary Angiography Data: A Comprehensive Review

Understanding the mechanisms that regulate atherosclerotic plaque formation and evolution is a crucial step for developing treatment strategies that will prevent plaque progression and reduce cardiovascular events. Advances in signal processing and the miniaturization of medical devices have enabled the design of multimodality intravascular imaging catheters that allow complete and detailed assessment of plaque morphology and biology. However, a significant limitation of these novel imaging catheters is that they provide two-dimensional (2D) visualization of the lumen and vessel wall and thus they cannot portray vessel geometry and 3D lesion architecture. To address this limitation computer-based methodologies and user-friendly software have been developed. These are able to off-line process and fuse intravascular imaging data with X-ray or computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) to reconstruct coronary artery anatomy. The aim of this review article is to summarize the evolution in the field of coronary artery modeling; we thus present the first methodologies that were developed to model vessel geometry, highlight the modifications introduced in revised methods to overcome the limitations of the first approaches and discuss the challenges that need to be addressed, so these techniques can have broad application in clinical practice and research.

[1]  P. Serruys,et al.  Hybrid intravascular imaging: recent advances, technical considerations, and current applications in the study of plaque pathophysiology , 2017, European heart journal.

[2]  Habib Samady,et al.  Identification of patients and plaques vulnerable to future coronary events with near-infrared spectroscopy intravascular ultrasound imaging: a prospective, cohort study , 2019, The Lancet.

[3]  Michail I. Papafaklis,et al.  Endothelial Shear Stress and Coronary Plaque Characteristics in Humans: Combined Frequency-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Computational Fluid Dynamics Study , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[4]  J. Reiber,et al.  Quantitative measurements in IVUS images , 1999, The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging.

[5]  Dimitrios I Fotiadis,et al.  Anatomically correct three-dimensional coronary artery reconstruction using frequency domain optical coherence tomographic and angiographic data: head-to-head comparison with intravascular ultrasound for endothelial shear stress assessment in humans. , 2015, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[6]  Antonis Sakellarios,et al.  Utility of Multimodality Intravascular Imaging and the Local Hemodynamic Forces to Predict Atherosclerotic Disease Progression. , 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[7]  Ryo Torii,et al.  Difference in haemodynamic microenvironment in vessels scaffolded with Absorb BVS and Mirage BRMS: insights from a preclinical endothelial shear stress study. , 2017, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[8]  Ryo Torii,et al.  Reliable in vivo intravascular imaging plaque characterization: A challenge unmet. , 2019, American heart journal.

[9]  Fanis G Kalatzis,et al.  A new methodology for accurate 3-dimensional coronary artery reconstruction using routine intravascular ultrasound and angiographic data: implications for widespread assessment of endothelial shear stress in humans. , 2013, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[10]  Francesco Prati,et al.  [The PROSPECT study]. , 2012, Giornale italiano di cardiologia.

[11]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Early detection and invasive passivation of future culprit lesions: a future potential or an unrealistic pursuit of chimeras? , 2013, American heart journal.

[12]  J. Affeldt,et al.  The feasibility study , 2019, The Information System Consultant’s Handbook.

[13]  Ryo Torii,et al.  Local Hemodynamics: An Innocent Bystander or a Critical Factor Regulating Neoatherosclerotic Evolution? , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[14]  David Brieger,et al.  Three-dimensional and two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography, and their prediction of reduced fractional flow reserve. , 2011, European heart journal.

[15]  N. Bruining,et al.  The impact of Fourier-Domain optical coherence tomography catheter induced motion artefacts on quantitative measurements of a PLLA-based bioresorbable scaffold , 2014, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[16]  P. Serruys,et al.  The role of shear stress in the destabilization of vulnerable plaques and related therapeutic implications , 2005, Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine.

[17]  Attila Thury,et al.  Images in cardiovascular medicine. Focal in-stent restenosis near step-up: roles of low and oscillating shear stress? , 2002, Circulation.

[18]  Jouke Dijkstra,et al.  The impact of plaque type on strut embedment/protrusion and shear stress distribution in bioresorbable scaffold. , 2019, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[19]  Johan H. C. Reiber,et al.  Fusion of 3D QCA and IVUS/OCT , 2011, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[20]  Akiko Maehara,et al.  Heterogeneity of Plaque Structural Stress Is Increased in Plaques Leading to MACE , 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[21]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Geometrically correct 3-D reconstruction of intravascular ultrasound images by fusion with biplane angiography-methods and validation , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  Jouke Dijkstra,et al.  Local Flow Patterns After Implantation of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold in Coronary Bifurcations - Novel Findings by Computational Fluid Dynamics. , 2018, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[23]  Raj Shekhar,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of the coronary artery wall by image fusion of intravascular ultrasound and bi-plane angiography , 2000, The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging.

[24]  Ioanna Chouvarda,et al.  Accurate and reproducible reconstruction of coronary arteries and endothelial shear stress calculation using 3D OCT: comparative study to 3D IVUS and 3D QCA. , 2015, Atherosclerosis.

[25]  Luca Mainardi,et al.  A framework for computational fluid dynamic analyses of patient-specific stented coronary arteries from optical coherence tomography images. , 2017, Medical engineering & physics.

[26]  P. Serruys,et al.  Strain distribution over plaques in human coronary arteries relates to shear stress. , 2008, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[27]  Michail I. Papafaklis,et al.  Prediction of Progression of Coronary Artery Disease and Clinical Outcomes Using Vascular Profiling of Endothelial Shear Stress and Arterial Plaque Characteristics: The PREDICTION Study , 2012, Circulation.

[28]  Dimitrios I Fotiadis,et al.  Fusion of optical coherence tomography and coronary angiography - in vivo assessment of shear stress in plaque rupture. , 2012, International journal of cardiology.

[29]  Donald P. Greenberg,et al.  Time-dependent three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound , 1995, SIGGRAPH.

[30]  J J Wentzel,et al.  Relationship Between Neointimal Thickness and Shear Stress After Wallstent Implantation in Human Coronary Arteries , 2001, Circulation.

[31]  Jouke Dijkstra,et al.  Implications of the local hemodynamic forces on the formation and destabilization of neoatherosclerotic lesions. , 2018, International journal of cardiology.

[32]  C J Slager,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of intracoronary ultrasound images. Rationale, approaches, problems, and directions. , 1994, Circulation.

[33]  A. V. D. van der Steen,et al.  Multidirectional wall shear stress promotes advanced coronary plaque development: comparing five shear stress metrics , 2019, Cardiovascular research.

[34]  S. Nicholls,et al.  The relationship between segmental wall shear stress and lipid core plaque derived from near-infrared spectroscopy. , 2018, Atherosclerosis.

[35]  J. Reiber,et al.  Impact of Side Branch Modeling on Computation of Endothelial Shear Stress in Coronary Artery Disease: Coronary Tree Reconstruction by Fusion of 3D Angiography and OCT. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[36]  Ryo Torii,et al.  Strut protrusion and shape impact on endothelial shear stress: insights from pre-clinical study comparing Mirage and Absorb bioresorbable scaffolds , 2017, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[37]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Interactive virtual endoscopy in coronary arteries based on multimodality fusion , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[38]  Antonis Sakellarios,et al.  Impact of local endothelial shear stress on neointima and plaque following stent implantation in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A subgroup-analysis of the COMFORTABLE AMI-IBIS 4 trial. , 2015, International journal of cardiology.

[39]  F. Rybicki,et al.  Quantifying the effect of side branches in endothelial shear stress estimates. , 2016, Atherosclerosis.

[40]  Theo van Walsum,et al.  3D fusion of intravascular ultrasound and coronary computed tomography for in-vivo wall shear stress analysis: a feasibility study , 2010, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[41]  C. von Birgelen,et al.  ANGUS: a new approach to three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary vessels by combined use of angiography and intravascular ultrasound , 1995, Computers in Cardiology 1995.

[42]  V. Bhargava,et al.  Axial movement of the intravascular ultrasound probe during the cardiac cycle: implications for three-dimensional reconstruction and measurements of coronary dimensions. , 1999, American heart journal.

[43]  Ryo Torii,et al.  Local Hemodynamic Forces After Stenting: Implications on Restenosis and Thrombosis , 2017, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[44]  Elazer R. Edelman,et al.  Constraining OCT with Knowledge of Device Design Enables High Accuracy Hemodynamic Assessment of Endovascular Implants , 2016, PloS one.

[45]  Eloisa Arbustini,et al.  Relationship between coronary plaque morphology of the left anterior descending artery and 12 months clinical outcome: the CLIMA study. , 2019, European heart journal.

[46]  Dimitrios I. Fotiadis,et al.  Coronary Angiography Accurately Estimate the Severity of a Luminal Stenosis ? Comparison of Quantitative Coronary Angiography With Intracoronary Ultrasound . Can Quantitative , 2009 .

[47]  P. Serruys,et al.  True 3-dimensional reconstruction of coronary arteries in patients by fusion of angiography and IVUS (ANGUS) and its quantitative validation. , 2000, Circulation.

[48]  Charis Costopoulos,et al.  Plaque Structural Stress Estimations Improve Prediction of Future Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Intracoronary Imaging , 2016, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[49]  Nicolas Foin,et al.  Biomechanical stress in coronary atherosclerosis: emerging insights from computational modelling , 2016, European heart journal.

[50]  D. Fotiadis,et al.  Hybrid intravascular imaging: current applications and prospective potential in the study of coronary atherosclerosis. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[51]  Zhen Qian,et al.  Prospective validation of standardized, 3-dimensional, quantitative coronary computed tomographic plaque measurements using radiofrequency backscatter intravascular ultrasound as reference standard in intermediate coronary arterial lesions: results from the ATLANTA (assessment of tissue characterist , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[52]  Jouke Dijkstra,et al.  Automated quantification of coronary plaque with computed tomography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound using a dedicated registration algorithm for fusion-based quantification. , 2012, European heart journal.

[53]  Michael C. McDaniel,et al.  Coronary Artery Wall Shear Stress Is Associated With Progression and Transformation of Atherosclerotic Plaque and Arterial Remodeling in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease , 2011, Circulation.

[54]  Ryo Torii,et al.  The Nidus for Possible Thrombus Formation: Insight From the Microenvironment of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[55]  Lei Xing,et al.  Low Endothelial Shear Stress Predicts Evolution to High-Risk Coronary Plaque Phenotype in the Future: A Serial Optical Coherence Tomography and Computational Fluid Dynamics Study , 2017, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[56]  Habib Samady,et al.  Role of biomechanical forces in the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis , 2016, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[57]  Dimitrios I Fotiadis,et al.  A method for 3D reconstruction of coronary arteries using biplane angiography and intravascular ultrasound images. , 2005, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[58]  V. Preedy,et al.  Prospective Cohort Study , 2010 .

[59]  Brett E. Bouma,et al.  Coronary Plaque Microstructure and Composition Modify Optical Polarization , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[60]  N Bom,et al.  On the IVUS plaque volume error in coronary arteries when neglecting curvature. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[61]  Johan H. C. Reiber,et al.  In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography , 2012, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[62]  R. W. Günther,et al.  3D-surface reconstruction of intravascular ultrasound images using personal computer hardware and a motorized catheter control , 2007, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[63]  Takafumi Hiro,et al.  Localized elevation of shear stress is related to coronary plaque rupture: a 3-dimensional intravascular ultrasound study with in-vivo color mapping of shear stress distribution. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[64]  Jonathan H. Gillard,et al.  Plaque Rupture in Coronary Atherosclerosis Is Associated With Increased Plaque Structural Stress , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[65]  Michiel Schaap,et al.  Detection and quantification of coronary atherosclerotic plaque by 64-slice multidetector CT: a systematic head-to-head comparison with intravascular ultrasound. , 2011, Atherosclerosis.

[66]  Akiko Maehara,et al.  A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[67]  Dalin Tang,et al.  Expert recommendations on the assessment of wall shear stress in human coronary arteries: existing methodologies, technical considerations, and clinical applications , 2019, European heart journal.

[68]  Akiko Maehara,et al.  Role of Low Endothelial Shear Stress and Plaque Characteristics in the Prediction of Nonculprit Major Adverse Cardiac Events: The PROSPECT Study. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[69]  Michail I. Papafaklis,et al.  ANGIOCARE: An automated system for fast three‐dimensional coronary reconstruction by integrating angiographic and intracoronary ultrasound data , 2008, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[70]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Three-dimensional optical frequency domain imaging in conventional percutaneous coronary intervention: the potential for clinical application. , 2013, European heart journal.

[71]  Habib Samady,et al.  Impact of combined plaque structural stress and wall shear stress on coronary plaque progression, regression, and changes in composition , 2019, European heart journal.

[72]  Habib Samady,et al.  Oscillatory wall shear stress is a dominant flow characteristic affecting lesion progression patterns and plaque vulnerability in patients with coronary artery disease , 2017, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[73]  M R Rees,et al.  In vivo validation of a novel semi-automated method for border detection in intravascular ultrasound images. , 2005, The British journal of radiology.

[74]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Retrospective image‐based gating of intracoronary ultrasound images for improved quantitative analysis: The intelligate method , 2004, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[75]  Dimitrios I Fotiadis,et al.  The effect of shear stress on neointimal response following sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation compared with bare-metal stents in humans. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[76]  E. Bolson,et al.  Quantitative Coronary Arteriography: Estimation of Dimensions, Hemodynamic Resistance, and Atheroma Mass of Coronary Artery Lesions Using the Arteriogram and Digital Computation , 1977, Circulation.

[77]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Association of wall shear stress with long-term vascular healing response following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation. , 2015, International journal of cardiology.

[78]  C von Birgelen,et al.  Electrocardiogram-gated intravascular ultrasound image acquisition after coronary stent deployment facilitates on-line three-dimensional reconstruction and automated lumen quantification. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[79]  Jerry Hirsch,et al.  The challenge is unmet , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[80]  N. Maglaveras,et al.  In-vivo validation of spatially correct three-dimensional reconstruction of human coronary arteries by integrating intravascular ultrasound and biplane angiography , 2006, Coronary artery disease.

[81]  Dimitrios I. Fotiadis,et al.  3D reconstruction of coronary arteries using Frequency Domain Optical Coherence Tomography images and biplane angiography , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[82]  Ryo Torii,et al.  Non-Newtonian pulsatile shear stress assessment: a method to differentiate bioresorbable scaffold platforms. , 2017, European heart journal.

[83]  Benjamin J Vakoc,et al.  Three-dimensional coronary artery microscopy by intracoronary optical frequency domain imaging. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[84]  Yiannis Kompatsiaris,et al.  IVUSAngio Tool: A publicly available software for fast and accurate 3D reconstruction of coronary arteries , 2013, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[85]  R. Shekhar,et al.  Fusion of intravascular ultrasound and biplane angiography for three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary arteries , 1996, Computers in Cardiology 1996.

[86]  Antonis Sakellarios,et al.  Implications of the local haemodynamic forces on the phenotype of coronary plaques , 2019, Heart.

[87]  Andrew Ooi,et al.  Endothelial shear stress 5 years after implantation of a coronary bioresorbable scaffold , 2018, European heart journal.