Sensory Adaptation within a Bayesian Framework for Perception

We extend a previously developed Bayesian framework for perception to account for sensory adaptation. We first note that the perceptual effects of adaptation seems inconsistent with an adjustment of the internally represented prior distribution. Instead, we postulate that adaptation increases the signal-to-noise ratio of the measurements by adapting the operational range of the measurement stage to the input range. We show that this changes the likelihood function in such a way that the Bayesian estimator model can account for reported perceptual behavior. In particular, we compare the model's predictions to human motion discrimination data and demonstrate that the model accounts for the commonly observed perceptual adaptation effects of repulsion and enhanced discriminability.

[1]  Norberto M. Grzywacz,et al.  A Bayesian Framework for Sensory Adaptation , 2002, Neural Computation.

[2]  Peter Wenderoth,et al.  Adaptation to temporal modulation can enhance differential speed sensitivity , 1999, Vision Research.

[3]  William Bialek,et al.  Adaptive Rescaling Maximizes Information Transmission , 2000, Neuron.

[4]  Alan A. Stocker,et al.  Constraining a Bayesian Model of Human Visual Speed Perception , 2004, NIPS.

[5]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Adaptation of retinal processing to image contrast and spatial scale , 1997, Nature.

[6]  Rajesh P. N. Rao Hierarchical Bayesian Inference in Networks of Spiking Neurons , 2004, NIPS.

[7]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning , 2004, Nature.

[8]  Peter Thompson,et al.  Velocity after-effects: The effects of adaptation to moving stimuli on the perception of subsequently seen moving stimuli , 1981, Vision Research.

[9]  D. Tranchina,et al.  Retinal light adaptation—evidence for a feedback mechanism , 1984, Nature.

[10]  C. Bowd,et al.  Direction-selective Coding of Stereoscopic (Cyclopean) Motion , 1997, Vision Research.

[11]  H. Barlow Vision: A theory about the functional role and synaptic mechanism of visual after-effects , 1991 .

[12]  Martin J. Wainwright,et al.  Visual adaptation as optimal information transmission , 1999, Vision Research.

[13]  C. Clifford Perceptual adaptation: motion parallels orientation , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Local velocity representation: evidence from motion adaptation , 1998, Vision Research.

[15]  Á. Kristjánsson,et al.  Increased sensitivity to speed changes during adaptation to first-order, but not to second-order motion , 2001, Vision Research.

[16]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Velocity coding: Evidence from perceived velocity shifts , 1985, Vision Research.

[17]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Motion illusions as optimal percepts , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.