Tactile efficiency of insect antennae with two hinge joints

Antennae are the main organs of the arthropod tactile sense. In contrast to other senses that are capable of retrieving spatial information, e.g. vision, spatial sampling of tactile information requires active movement of the sense organ. For a quantitative analysis of basic principles of active tactile sensing, we use a generic model of arbitrary antennae with two hinge joints (revolute joints). This kind of antenna is typical for Orthoptera and Phasmatodea, i.e. insect orders that contain model species for the study of antennal movements, including cricket, locust and stick insect. First, we analyse the significance of morphological properties on workspace and sampling acuity. It is shown how joint axis orientation determines areas out of reach while affecting acuity in the areas within reach. Second, we assume a parametric set of movement strategies, based on empirical data on the stick insect Carausius morosus, and investigate the role of each strategy parameter on tactile sampling performance. A stochastic environment is used to measure sampling density, and a viscous friction model is assumed to introduce energy consumption and, thus, a measure of tactile efficiency. Up to a saturation level, sampling density is proportional to the range or frequency of joint angle modulation. The effect of phase shift is strong if joint angle modulation frequencies are equal, but diminishes for other frequency ratios. Speed of forward progression influences the optimal choice of movement strategy. Finally, for an analysis of environmental effects on tactile performance, we show how efficiency depends on predominant edge direction. For example, with slanted and non-orthogonal joint axis orientations, as present in the stick insect, the optimal sampling strategy is less sensitive to a change from horizontal to vertical edge predominance than with orthogonal and non-slanted joint axes, as present in a cricket.

[1]  Toshio Tsuji,et al.  Active antenna for contact sensing , 1998, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[2]  André Frank Krause,et al.  Neuroethological Concepts and their Transfer to Walking Machines , 2003, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[3]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  A robot that walks; emergent behaviors from a carefully evolved network , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  V. Dürr,et al.  The antennal motor system of the stick insect Carausius morosus: anatomy and antennal movement pattern during walking , 2001, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[5]  Aerodynamic and mechanical properties of the antennae as air-current sense organs inLocusta migratoria , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[6]  L. Gaul,et al.  The Role of Friction in Mechanical Joints , 2001 .

[7]  Michael F. Land,et al.  Optics and Vision in Invertebrates , 1981 .

[8]  Universitfit Konstanz,et al.  A Preliminary Note on a New Optomotor Response in Crickets: Antennal Tracking of Moving Targets , 1981 .

[9]  Y. Pelletier,et al.  Obstacle perception by insect antennae during terrestrial locomotion , 1994 .

[10]  Eric J. Warrant,et al.  Arthropod eye design and the physical limits to spatial resolving power , 1993, Progress in Neurobiology.

[11]  J. Zeil,et al.  Tactile localisation: the function of active antennal movements in the crayfishCherax destructor , 1985, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[12]  A. D. Imms Memoirs: On the Antennal Musculature in Insects and other Arthropods , 1939 .

[13]  R. Paul Robot manipulators : mathematics, programming, and control : the computer control of robot manipulators , 1981 .

[14]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  A Robot that Walks; Emergent Behaviors from a Carefully Evolved Network , 1989, Neural Computation.

[15]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  A Biologically Inspired Passive Antenna for Steering Control of a Running Robot , 2003, ISRR.

[16]  M. Gebhardt,et al.  Involvement of the suboesophageal and thoracic ganglia in the control of antennal movements in crickets , 1997, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[17]  André Frank Krause,et al.  The stick insect antenna as a biological paragon for an actively moved tactile probe for obstacle detection , 2001 .

[18]  George G. Adams,et al.  Large Deflection Analysis of a Biomimetic Lobster Robot Antenna due to Contact and Flow , 2001 .

[19]  Volker Dürr,et al.  A posture optimization algorithm for model-based motion capture of movement sequences , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  Thomas Kindermann Positive Rückkopplung zur Kontrolle komplexer Kinematiken am Beispiel des hexapoden Laufens : Experimente und Simulationen , 2003 .

[21]  D. Godden The physiological mechanism of catalepsy in the stick insectCarausius morosus Br. , 1974, Journal of comparative physiology.

[22]  V. Dürr,et al.  Antennal movements and mechanoreception: neurobiology of active tactile sensors , 2005 .

[23]  H. Heinzel,et al.  Aerodynamic and mechanical properties of the antennae as air-current sense organs inLocusta migratoria , 1980, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[24]  J. Camhi,et al.  High-frequency steering maneuvers mediated by tactile cues: antennal wall-following in the cockroach. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.