Business Process Complexity, System Complexity and Perceived Audit Quality: An ERP System Perspective

The turbulent events of the global financial crises have highlighted the importance of audit quality. Auditing in today’s business environment involves navigating through organizational information technology (IT) landscape dominated by ERP systems. Organizations depend on ERP systems for financial reporting which involve dealing with statutory and regulatory provisions. ERP systems thus, have become an integral part of compliance strategy due to their support for internal controls. ERP systems are associated with inherent system and business process complexities capable of carving new auditing landscape for auditors. However, the implications of such ERP-induced process changes and system complexities on audit quality have not been well understood and investigated. This study attempts to bridge this gap. The primary goal of this research is to frame business process complexity, system complexity and audit process as key predictors of audit quality as perceived by external auditors. Using empirical evidence gathered from auditors experienced in post-ERP audit, the research found that auditors’ post-ERP perception in an audit due to ERP implementation influenced the perceived audit quality. Specifically, system complexity, audit process changes and control risk were significant determinants of perceived audit quality. In addition, the findings reveal business process complexity and system complexity as key antecedents of control risk in an ERP audit. Joseph Nwankpa The University of Texas Pan American, USA Yaman Roumani Eastern Michigan University, USA DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4860-9.ch010

[1]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Information measures, effective complexity, and total information , 1996 .

[3]  Sally Wright,et al.  Information System Assurance for Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Unique Risk Considerations , 2002, J. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Kin Yew Low,et al.  The Effects of Industry Specialization on Audit Risk Assessments and Audit‐Planning Decisions , 2004 .

[5]  Thomas Kalling,et al.  ERP Systems and the Strategic Management Processes that Lead to Competitive Advantage , 2003, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[6]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Effects of Personalizaion and Familiarity on Trust and Adoption of Recommendation Agents , 2006, MIS Q..

[7]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  ERP project dynamics and enacted dialogue: perceived understanding, perceived leeway, and the nature of task-related conflicts , 2001, DATB.

[8]  Doocheol Moon,et al.  Auditor Tenure and Perceptions of Audit Quality , 2005 .

[9]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  The Future of Enterprise System-Enabled Organizations , 2000, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[10]  Charalambos Spathis,et al.  Enterprise resource planning systems' impact on accounting processes , 2004, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[11]  Teemu Malmi,et al.  Moderate impact of ERPS on management accounting: a lag or permanent outcome? , 2002 .

[12]  Jorge S. Cardoso,et al.  Business Process Control-Flow Complexity: Metric, Evaluation, and Validation , 2008, Int. J. Web Serv. Res..

[13]  Jeff Sutherland,et al.  Enterprise application integration and complex adaptive systems , 2002, CACM.

[14]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Understanding misalignment and cascading change of ERP implementation: a stage view of process analysis , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[15]  B. Curtis,et al.  Measurement and experimentation in software engineering , 1980, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[16]  She-I Chang,et al.  The Development of a Computer Auditing System Sufficient for Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404— A Study on the Purchasing and Expenditure Cycle of the ERP System , 2008, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[17]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[18]  Severin V. Grabski,et al.  A Review of ERP Research: A Future Agenda for Accounting Information Systems , 2011, J. Inf. Syst..

[19]  William Brown,et al.  What ERP systems can tell us about Sarbanes-Oxley , 2005, Inf. Manag. Comput. Security.

[20]  Liming Guan,et al.  The evolution of IT auditing and internal control standards in financial statement audits , 2004 .

[21]  Madjid Tavana Developing Business Strategies and Identifying Risk Factors in Modern Organizations , 2013 .

[22]  Jay C. Thibodeau,et al.  The impact of information technology on the audit process: an assessment of the state of the art and implications for the future , 2001 .

[23]  Ronald E. Giachetti,et al.  A measure of agility as the complexity of the enterprise system , 2004 .

[24]  Steve G. Sutton,et al.  Enterprise systems and the re-shaping of accounting systems: A call for research , 2006, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Wynne W. Chin Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[26]  August-Wilhelm Scheer,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: making ERP a success , 2000, CACM.

[27]  Ellen N. Sayed,et al.  Avoiding ERP pitfalls , 2006 .

[28]  Bharat Maheshwari,et al.  Challenges in enhancing enterprise resource planning systems for compliance with Sarbanes‐Oxley Act and analogous Canadian legislation , 2008 .

[29]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[30]  Ioannis Ignatiadis,et al.  The Effect of ERP System Workarounds on Organizational Control: An interpretivist case study , 2009, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Moshe Zviran,et al.  A System Development Methodology for ERP Systems , 2002, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[32]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[34]  Bassam Hasan,et al.  Examining the Effects of Computer Self-Efficacy and System Complexity on Technology Acceptance , 2007, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[35]  Christian Koch,et al.  BPR and ERP: realising a vision of process with IT , 2001, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[36]  Brian Daugherty,et al.  An Examination of Partner Perceptions of Partner Rotation: Direct and Indirect Consequences to Audit Quality , 2012 .

[37]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  What Happens After ERP Implementation: Understanding the Impact of Interdependence and Differentiation on Plant-Level Outcomes , 2005, MIS Q..

[38]  L. DeAngelo,et al.  Auditor size and audit quality , 1981 .

[39]  Pratim Datta,et al.  Perceived Audit Quality from ERP Implementations , 2012, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[40]  E. Clemons,et al.  Newly vulnerable markets in an age of pure information products: an analysis of online music and online news , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[41]  Peter Best,et al.  Auditing SAP R/3 – Control Risk Assessment , 2000 .

[42]  Sally Wright,et al.  Are Financial Auditors Overconfident in Their Ability to Assess Risks Associated with Enterprise Resource Planning Systems? , 2004, J. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Robert W. Scapens,et al.  ERP systems and management accounting change: opportunities or impacts? A research note , 2003 .

[44]  Stefan Sundgren,et al.  Perceived Audit Quality, Modified Audit Opinions and the Likelihood of Liquidating Bankruptcy Among Financially Weak Firms , 2009 .

[45]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An Exploratory Study of the Dialectics of Change , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Sue Newell,et al.  Implementing enterprise resource planning and knowledge management systems in tandem: fostering efficiency and innovation complementarity , 2003, Inf. Organ..

[47]  Qing Hu,et al.  Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management , 2007, MIS Q..

[48]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Job Characteristics and Job Satisfaction: Understanding the Role of Enterprise Resource , 2010, MIS Q..

[49]  Rosnah Idrus,et al.  ERP Misfit-Reduction Strategies: A Moderated Model of System Modification and Organizational Adaptation , 2013, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..