Effect of the upper limbs muscles activity on the mechanical energy gain in pole vaulting.

The shoulder muscles are highly solicited in pole vaulting and may afford energy gain. The objective of this study was to determine the bilateral muscle activity of the upper-limbs to explain the actions performed by the vaulter to bend the pole and store elastic energy. Seven experienced athletes performed 5-10 vaults which were recorded using two video cameras (50Hz). The mechanical energy of the centre of gravity (CG) was computed, while surface electromyographic (EMG) profiles were recorded from 5 muscles bilateral: deltoideus, infraspinatus, biceps brachii, triceps, and latissimus dorsi muscles. The level of intensity from EMG profile was retained in four sub phases between take-off (TO1) and complete pole straightening (PS). The athletes had a mean mechanical energy gain of 22% throughout the pole vault, while the intensities of deltoideus, biceps brachii, and latissimus dorsi muscles were sub phases-dependent (p<0.05). Stabilizing the glenohumeral joint (increase of deltoideus and biceps brachii activity) and applying a pole bending torque (increase of latissimus dorsi activity) required specific muscle activation. The gain in mechanical energy of the vaulter could be linked to an increase in muscle activation, especially from latissimusdorsi muscles.

[1]  Lawrence A. Bergman,et al.  An Inverse Dynamic Analysis of the Pole Vault , 1986 .

[2]  Adamantios Arampatzis,et al.  BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF THE POLE VAULT , 1998 .

[3]  P. Leva Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov's segment inertia parameters. , 1996 .

[4]  B. Freriks,et al.  Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. , 2000, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[5]  Julien Frère,et al.  Mechanics of pole vaulting: a review , 2010, Sports biomechanics.

[6]  B. Göpfert,et al.  Influence of the scale function on wavelet transformation of the surface electromyographic signal , 2012, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[7]  Vinzenz von Tscharner,et al.  Intensity analysis in time-frequency space of surface myoelectric signals by wavelets of specified resolution , 2000 .

[8]  Adamantios Arampatzis,et al.  Effect of the pole--human body interaction on pole vaulting performance. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  A. Guével,et al.  Is interindividual variability of EMG patterns in trained cyclists related to different muscle synergies? , 2010, Journal of applied physiology.

[10]  M Ekevad,et al.  Influence of pole length and stiffness on the energy conversion in pole-vaulting. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Beat Göpfert,et al.  Influence of Kinematics and Muscular Activations on Pole Vault Performance , 2010 .

[12]  Vinzenz von Tscharner,et al.  Last word on point:counterpoint: spectral properties of the surface EMG can characterize/do not provide information about motor unit recruitment strategies and muscle fiber type. , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.

[13]  Maud Bassement,et al.  Using EMGs and kinematics data to study the take-off technique of experts and novices for a pole vaulting short run-up educational exercise. , 2010, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[14]  F Schade,et al.  Influence of different approaches for calculating the athlete's mechanical energy on energetic parameters in the pole vault. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  F C T van der Helm,et al.  Requirements for upper extremity motions during activities of daily living. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[16]  Nicholas P. Linthorne,et al.  Energy loss in the pole vault take‐off and the advantage of the flexible pole , 2000 .

[17]  M Hubbard,et al.  Dynamics of the pole vault. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  B. Nigg,et al.  Point: spectral properties of the surface EMG can characterize/do not provide information about motor unit recruitment strategies and muscle fiber type. , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.

[19]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  The Use of Surface Electromyography in Biomechanics , 1997 .

[20]  B Lundberg,et al.  Simulation of 'smart' pole vaulting. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  C. Torrence,et al.  A Practical Guide to Wavelet Analysis. , 1998 .

[22]  Maud Bassement,et al.  Kinematics and EMG Analysis of Expert Pole Vaulter’s Lower Limb During Take off Phase (P218) , 2008 .

[23]  Adamantios Arampatzis,et al.  Reproducibility of energy parameters in the pole vault. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  François Hug,et al.  Can muscle coordination be precisely studied by surface electromyography? , 2011, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[25]  Margaret Estivalet,et al.  The engineering of sport 7 , 2008 .

[26]  Michel Mesnard,et al.  Influence of the moment exerted by the athlete on the pole in pole-vaulting performance. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  D. Farina Counterpoint: spectral properties of the surface EMG do not provide information about motor unit recruitment and muscle fiber type. , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.